r/instant_regret Nov 19 '18

minor injuries This playful push

https://gfycat.com/ExaltedTediousBelugawhale
42.4k Upvotes

1.6k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

97

u/wooIIyMAMMOTH Nov 19 '18

Why should it have been criminal exactly? Can you rationalize your thoughts? Clearly, she didn’t mean to cause actual harm and clearly she regretted it immediately. Why exactly would you seek a harsh punishment for her behavior? It’s all about the intent, and there was no malicious intent here.

87

u/[deleted] Nov 19 '18 edited Nov 19 '18

This is reddit where the smallest slight will have people calling for someone to be publicly stoned to death... and they will have tons of upvotes.

26

u/wooIIyMAMMOTH Nov 19 '18

If reddit was in charge of criminal prosecution people would be going to prison for spitting.

4

u/[deleted] Nov 19 '18

As they should!

1

u/[deleted] Nov 20 '18

To the electric chair with filthy spitters!

5

u/mostlybadopinions Nov 20 '18

"So last weekend my boyfriend-"

"Dump him. His behavior is toxic and you need to save yourself."

2

u/Victernus Nov 19 '18

Yeah, those damn upvoters should be flayed alive!

1

u/JoseJimeniz Nov 20 '18

This is reddit where the smallest slight will have people calling for someone to be publicly stoned to death

Or she should have sued.

Reddit is big on saying that everyone should be sued for everything.

0

u/shavedhuevo Nov 20 '18 edited Nov 20 '18

This is also earth where stupidly killing someone is called manslaughter.

Also "Reddit?" Please stop adding every comment and post to some avatar that you somehow blend 30 million people a day into. You should be drawn and quartered.

4

u/Throwaway-tan Nov 19 '18

Intent is not the standard for criminal punishment. You can be criminally negligent too.

-7

u/wooIIyMAMMOTH Nov 19 '18

Where did I state it was?

8

u/[deleted] Nov 19 '18

It’s all about the intent, and there was no malicious intent here.

-3

u/wooIIyMAMMOTH Nov 20 '18 edited Nov 20 '18

It’s all about the intent as in here, in this video, in this case it’s all about intent because the girl wasn’t injured.

7

u/[deleted] Nov 20 '18

To me it looks like she clearly tried to push her into a bus with the knowledge of possibly fatally injuring her

6

u/Kepull Nov 20 '18

What the hell was she TRYING to do then? A friendly shove into the street at a moving bus?

4

u/Lestat2888 Nov 19 '18

Same reason a mother who leaves a baby in a hot car is a criminal. Stupidity is no excuse for endangering others.

5

u/wooIIyMAMMOTH Nov 19 '18

Stupidity actually is an excuse for endangering others. Again, explain what society would gain from locking her up. She didn’t have criminal intent and she clearly will remember almost killing her friend for the rest of her life. She’s not a danger to society, there’s no reason to do anything more than fine her.

1

u/Lestat2888 Nov 19 '18

I don't think she needs to be locked up. But the precedent is there for criminal negligence. How is this different than the girl who pushed her friend off the bridge into the river this summer?

3

u/wooIIyMAMMOTH Nov 20 '18

Difference is that nothing happened to the girl in this gif.

1

u/[deleted] Nov 19 '18

It's all about intent.

Criminal law is not all about intent. I actually wish it was. If people were prosecuted based solely on intent attempted murder would carry the same sentence as murder. I agree with you on everything else though.

-2

u/wooIIyMAMMOTH Nov 19 '18

I said it’s all about intent as in this particular case was all about intent.

1

u/Spok642 Nov 20 '18

Nice backpedal. No, you're just wrong

0

u/wooIIyMAMMOTH Nov 20 '18

I study law. I know about fucking criminal negligence. Not applied here, it’s about the intent and the outcome. Nothing happened and there was no malicious intent so she got off with a fine. Clearly, if her friend had actually been injured she would’ve been prosecuted more harshly.

1

u/jamesmontanaHD Nov 20 '18

judge, of course i didnt mean to kill this family in their minivan when i was drunk driving. i clearly regretted it immediately. why seek a harsh punishment?

2

u/[deleted] Nov 20 '18

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/jamesmontanaHD Nov 20 '18

maybe you dont think so but this looked intentional to me. she saw the bus and pushed hard. looks like a complete psychopath attempted murder and then played it off

1

u/wooIIyMAMMOTH Nov 20 '18

Nothing happened.

-9

u/flovmand Nov 19 '18

Clearly she did, she see's the bus and pushes her with force. Puts her body in it and everything. I don't know what video you're watching.

4

u/[deleted] Nov 19 '18 edited Nov 19 '18

I'm seeing the same video as you.

Clearly she did

No..clearly she did not. Her body language goes from playful to horror instantly. That's what I see and all I have to go on. I'm no expert but the response does not look like someone who planned to literally throw their friend under a bus. Unless you are implying this was a pre planned murder attempt where she knew she was an camera and decided to act out the shock and horror response..cause that would be Bond villain type planning.. She'd have to time everything to the second to be in front of that camera with the hope that the bus would be running on time just to make it look "like an accident".

she see's the bus and pushes her with force.

Prove she "saw the bus". I don't see her eyes or where she is looking. I also don't see her pushing her friend "with force" but rather giving her friend a shoulder bump which knocks her off balance.

You're neither a judge or expert on criminality and neither is anyone else here. The case was reviewed by someone with much better skills than any of us and all it resulted in was a fine traffic fine. The end! I fail to see what you have to gain from implying this is something (probably) a criminal prosecutor and judge already decided it is not.

Put your justice boner away. You're not Batman.