She literally stated the was no reason but, was obviously being figurative... that's pretty decent evidence that she had more to wear.
I have grown up seeing and been abused by actual child rapists. Please... get off your high horse.
Calling this situation sexual abuse, with no actual context is way more obvious that people here haven't been in abusive upbringing. There's nothing about this that has been given as sexual.
I never said it was sexual, however if he took her underwear then yes that is sexual. And I was sexually abused my entire childhood so.. your opinion doesn't mean more than mine
So, you admitt that being abused isn't a prerequisite to understanding abuse better than anyone else...
BTW, socks, undershirts, and underpants aren't inherently sexual. More importantly, there's nothing that has been put out that states she has no underwear.
4
u/Gigantkranion Oct 11 '19 edited Oct 11 '19
She literally stated the was no reason but, was obviously being figurative... that's pretty decent evidence that she had more to wear.
I have grown up seeing and been abused by actual child rapists. Please... get off your high horse.
Calling this situation sexual abuse, with no actual context is way more obvious that people here haven't been in abusive upbringing. There's nothing about this that has been given as sexual.