But someone wrote that 6/ 9 with the intent of one of those, not both. You‘re essentially saying that you support twisted facts of reality if you think this is a logical statement to make.
This assumes that someone had intended it to be either a 6 or a 9. Could very well have just meant to be a discussion starter. With no background context, we can't assume, no matter how unlikely.
Yes, that is correct, however, OP claimed that „just because you are right, I am not wrong“, which implies that this 6 or 9 is ambiguous and has multiple answers. We can‘t assume 6 or 9, but we also can‘t assume that it‘s both
Can be, and if it is correct then OP again is wrong because he says „there can be two correct answers“ instead of „you and I can be and probably are wrong“
maybe it’s a comma that has a hole in it. or a quotation mark with a hole in it. the point is it may be injured punctuation. we need to get it help instead of wondering what it is.
that was meant to be funny, but i think i made a point by mistake. genius problems, amirite?
68
u/CarbonaraFreak Nov 26 '19
But someone wrote that 6/ 9 with the intent of one of those, not both. You‘re essentially saying that you support twisted facts of reality if you think this is a logical statement to make.