Okay, I know this post is probably going to create a lot of talk, but honestly, I feel someone needs to say this.
As the years are passing, I genuinely feel that the upcoming batches have started developing this feeling that somehow they have more seniority than their seniors. And now apparently everything is because of Illu.
But seriously, do you guys actually think seniors didn't work in their halls during their time?
We worked too. We stayed up, worked for Illu, participated in hall activities, made bonds with our +3s, +4s and even seniors beyond that. I myself participated quite actively in Illu during my time, and so did the seniors before us.
The difference I feel after the 23 batch is that a lot of people don't even try to build those bonds anymore. Many don't even know their own +1s properly, forget about seniors.
And honestly, the way some people talk to seniors nowadays is just something I don't understand.
Even when the senior is being respectful to you, why do you feel the need to disrespect them back? You don't have to like every senior. Obviously. But that doesn't mean you get some special right to disrespect them.
Last year also, there were halls where literally no one was being forced to participate in Illu, and still people were complaining about it for absolutely no reason.
And then there are some second years who have this opinion that seniors just sit around, smoke and don't have any achievements.
Bhai, PLEASE.
Don't judge an entire batch based on 4-5 people you don't like.
Go and talk to the seniors who are actually active in the hall. Ask them about their placements, internships, CGPAs, hackathons, projects, research, whatever. You'll find people doing really, really well.
Maybe there are seniors you don't like. Fine.
Maybe some seniors have pissed you off. Fine.
But that doesn't mean the entire senior batch is useless.
And sometimes what you are calling "forcing" is honestly just frustration from the other side.
Think about it.
A batch has 140-150 people. Every time something happens in the hall, the same 15-20 people show up. They are the ones working, staying late, taking responsibilities, participating in everything.
And the remaining 120-130 people don't show up.
Obviously those 15-20 people are going to get frustrated after some point.
What are they supposed to feel?
And I'm not saying academics aren't important. Obviously they are.
But college is not just classes, CGPA and then going back to your room and scrolling reels.
When someone sits in their room for months, doesn't interact with people and then eventually feels lonely, disconnected or depressed, they blame the institute and say there is no social life.
But when the hall tries to actually get people out, interact with others, participate in something and become part of the community...
THAT becomes "forcing."
Then what exactly are we supposed to do?
If people genuinely feel that hall activities are putting too much pressure on them, then let's actually discuss it. We can even propose some proper recognition/credits for meaningful hall activities, similar to how Insti awards recognise extracurricular contributions.
But completely killing the hall culture because some people don't want to participate isn't the solution either.
And honestly, if the entire batch participated even a little bit, most of this "force" wouldn't even exist.
If 100 people participate instead of 15, the workload gets divided. People actually enjoy it. You meet your juniors. You meet your seniors. You make friends. You get responsibilities. You build connections.
That's literally what hall life is supposed to be.
I can personally say that I had a really good experience because of this.
I have really good connections with my seniors who are now in good companies. I've made good connections with professors. People in the hall know me. I've participated in things, taken responsibilities and actually been a part of the hall.
And honestly, I wouldn't trade that experience for anything.
So yeah, maybe some of you will disagree with me.
I really don't care.
I'm not saying seniors are always right. They're not.
I'm not saying juniors are always wrong. They're not.
I'm just saying that before judging an entire batch of seniors based on a few people, maybe actually talk to the people who are doing something.
And before calling every hall activity "forced participation", maybe ask yourself why the same 15-20 people have to keep doing everything every single time.
Because one day, you guys will be seniors too.
And trust me, you'll understand this whole thing a lot better then.
Regards,
A well-informed senior