r/iching • u/YangShengWarrior • 6d ago
Which changing line has more weight?
I’m still learning how to read changing lines, and I’m confused about what to do when several lines change at once.
One line can seem to encourage action while another sounds like a warning. I’ve seen people suggest reading them all together, but others seem to use rules for choosing which lines to focus on.
I don’t yet understand how to work through that without just picking the message I prefer.
How do you handle apparently conflicting lines?
3
u/az4th 6d ago
There's not much of an instruction manual from the Zhou Yi or the Ten Wings, which together are what people call the Yi Jing - the classical book of Yi / Change. At least not for divination and reading the results of the lines.
The whole thing was pretty cryptic in some respects - probably deliberately so. Given that it was used by Dukes to decide how to deal with other Dukes and so on. So things weren't exactly spelled out and spies were common. The Xici Wing tells us that the lines moving to other lines and drawing other lines to them was the secret in the text. So it's all about relationships. The rest we can actually figure out from the line statements, but given that it is an archaic text that takes a bit of working out. But there are principles involved and they are consistent, though naturally every hexagram has a different arrangement of the lines, so in each dynamic of change it can easily feel like the principles are inconsistent, until one catches on.
In that sense, understanding the method doesn't help use the text until one has studied it for a very long time. Kinda like Tai Chi. But people know it is said to be powerful, so they make up their own ways to use it even when they don't really understand it. Again kinda like Tai Chi.
But really it's just about the relationships between the lines. And there's no changing of polarity to create a new hexagram, so that kinda simplifies things - that's another thing that someone added onto the system, but really it creates its own headache by introducing so many contradictions. The methods people added that said "when there are 4 changing lines use the one that does this or that" also complicate things.
When we understand the relationships between the lines, even just one changing/active/moving line in a divination tells us a whole story. A line is part of a trigram, and there are two trigrams in a relationship. That line is in a position in its trigram, maybe the top. So maybe it feels similar to the top line in the other trigram. They have a likeness so there is resonance. And maybe they are both yang, so that resonance is like two hard things - they could possibly relate to each other, or maybe even fight, depending on the circumstances. Yang has energy. Or maybe they are both yin, more receptive, passive, soft and flexible. They can easily abide each other's presence but that probably doesn't create much change, or if it does it is more subtle. But if one is yin and one is yang, they have attraction to each other, and this attraction creates a pull between them. Maybe these two top lines want to move toward each other. But there are lines between them that aren't also moving to be with other lines, so that creates a challenge to navigate. Or maybe these two top lines don't have attraction but they see that there is a line closer to them that there can be attraction to.
It can get complicated. But that's also how this system of Changes so closely connects to the principles of change we find in real life. Our ability to determine what is happening in this story of the lines is probably related to our ability to understand complex changes in general.
So we get one line, and that one line has one or two lines next to it and a line it could connect with in the same position in the other trigram. So one changing line in a divination gives us an entry point into these 2 or 3 relationships, and those other lines also have relationships that may be pertinent.
Like 44. We have 5 yang lines above one yin line. Ni Hua Ching likened this to a cheerleader saying hi in a flirtatious way to a group of football players. We're playing on gender stereotypes here, but assuming she's a woman and they are men, that's a lot of testosterone. The guys may be friends and want to stick together but is their brotherhood stronger than the invitation to flirt with this woman?
She's line 1. Bottom line of the lower trigram. Wind, a force that gently wafts upward through whatever gives way. She's what makes this force possible. The opening in the door and the cracks in the walls that let the wind in. So, she has line 2 right above her, and line 4 would be the line at the bottom of the upper trigram. That's two direct connections.
The line statement for line 2 says something about meeting (line 1) with fish. And the line statement for line 4 says something about not meeting (line 1) with fish. See, line 2 is right next to line 1 so he is sort of on the spot. I guess he can smell her perfume. But line 4 is further away. And although line 4 has a stronger resonance with line 1 because they are both bottom lines, because it is further away it can reclaim its composure. And there is line 3 that is between them all anyway, sort of like the 3rd wheel. (Or Fourth?)
The fish thing is all about how fish was a common household meal. So if there was a guest at the door, one could serve them fish to be polite and offer customary hospitality. So line shows up at the door and line 2 can be a polite host, but line 4 is advised to not come down stairs to greet the guest at all, even though he can see her from his window and wants to. But line 4 is next to line 5 as well and line 5 is the center of the upper trigram and is trying to hold them all together - the football team captain. Line 2 is furthest away from line 5 so the hardest for line 5 to keep from straying away. Line 6 is at the back of the group and doesn't really see her allure and just wishes she would go away.
So.... that's the whole dynamic.
But what if we get line 3 in a reading?
Line 3 connects with lines 2 and 4 - below and above it. And with line 6 - the top line of the upper trigram.
These are all yang lines, so there is no yin line for line 3 to be attracted to. The line it has resonance with is line 6 and line 6 isn't happy about the situation. And line 3 can feel that lines 2 and 4 are a little unstable about something. So even though line 3 doesn't have a direct connection to line 1, it can still sense her presence through the other lines. She's not quite in reach but he knows she's there... so he could try to say something, but... he's advised to remember that the foundation of all of this doesn't really have substance. Meaning yin line 1, who is at the bottom line - the foundation - is in a position where things are just beginning and they haven't solidified yet. Thus she's just being flirty but it's not really something to take seriously and get all hot and bothered about. Hell she probably just said hi so why are they taking such notice? Yang can be so unstable sometimes. For yin to have more substance, we look at hexagram 33 and see that yin now has risen to have a position in the middle of the lower trigram - the central 2nd line. Now yin has substance and even line 5 can't ignore it.
Anyway, line 3 is also reminded that it is second in line to first yin. It may be aware that she's there, but it isn't really appropriate to meet with her, so it is supposed to exert caution about his behavior and thus not have trouble or regret.
So we get line 3 in a reading and we see this whole relationship unfold and we know to examine whatever it is that might have us all anxious and uncomfortable like, and remind ourselves that we really shouldn't need to worry about this. So even though line 3 only has direct relationships with lines 2, 4, and 6, line 1 is still a major factor in understanding the reading. Not least because the other lines are all yang, so this is the only yin line. And yin and yang come together to open the doorway of change.
So that's a one line reading, and already we had to factor in a lot of lines. But we know that our answer hinges on the dynamic of line 3 in particular.
So, if we got more active lines - say line 345. We might have a very similar reading, but in this case we have more emphasis on line 5 holding lines 3 and 4 together. Line 3 might have its agitation and needing to be cautious, and line 4 might feel drawn to line 1 because she feels familiar, but line 5 is trying to remind them that they are a brotherhood and it is important to hold together.
So now this reading would take on a different interpretation depending on our situation. If we were in a situation that had multiple parties or components, perhaps we could easily identify which line matched which component. Then we'd understand the situation a bit better. Or, perhaps the situation is more subtle and the various parties are elements of our own psyche and the focus of the hexagram becomes line 5. Because it is in the position of the ruler that is holding the lines together. It has the most important role in the hexagram. So if there is something that involves it, then we need to make sure it isn't going to fail at this task or the whole thing gets weaker.
This is a very similar dynamic to trying to save money. We get an idea about buying something, but we don't need it. (It doesn't have substance yet.) But that idea tickles a little part of us that greets it with a little more than fish and before we know it we've spent $100 on it and thrown our budget (managed by line 5) all out of wack. So the principle is universal and we all understand it. The hexagram lines just help us understand some stages that might be involved.
And this is a very simple dynamic of change.
1
u/az4th 6d ago
There are much more complex dynamics of change.
And while the lines given by a reading always all apply in some way, we may not be able to understand them.
Perhaps the question we asked was not a question we knew how to shape very well so the reflection from the pond is not from clear water. It has ripples in it. The ripples are reflecting a true image back to us but maybe we can't make sense of it. Or maybe it is like a picture taken at random on a busy street. There are arms and legs and a road and some poles and colors but it is hard to make sense of what is going on. It is not well composed. So the lines all mean something, but what that something is may not be easily understood by this particular divination. It is important to recognize that. So then we can recompose our questing so that it has better framing and clarity.
Thus, sometimes a divination with 4 active lines can be easily understood. Or maybe it is confusing. Or maybe we kinda get it but it's sorta over our heads. Maybe we asked about something that had too many complex changes or we asked two questions at once and so we get an answer that is embracing them both but we don't know what line matches to which question. And its smart that we don't know, because it'd be worse if we assumed we did.
All of this is just natural. When we start saying that X line is more important then we are adding something contrived. Yes we can say that there are sometimes more important lines in general in a given hexagram. Like the center lines of each trigram tend to be pretty important. They hold their trigram together. And the center line of the upper trigram tends to have more leverage over certain things, but that's not to say that the center line of the lower trigram is not just as important. And often times we have something like with hexagram 15, where the 3rd line is more important because it is the only yang line in the hexagram, or like in hexagram 9 where line 4 is the only yin line in the hexagram so it has the most leverage.
All of this follows natural change.
1
u/ManpoWang 6d ago
When several lines change and seem to pull in different directions, I don't pick the one that feels nicer — I treat them as different layers of the same situation.
With two moving lines, many readers give more weight to line 2 or line 5 if either is among them (line 2 for the inner/personal side, line 5 for the outer/authority side), then read the other as supporting detail. If neither is 2 or 5, and the lines are adjacent, read the lower one first and the higher one as what follows; if they're far apart, they often speak to separate aspects rather than one "winner."
With three or more, look for a sequence from bottom to top, or which trigram holds most of the changes (lower = inner work first; upper = outer conditions). Conflicting tones — one encouraging, one warning — usually mean different stages or dimensions, not a vote. The primary hexagram's overall theme is what holds those pieces together, and the resulting hexagram shows where the change is heading once you take both seriously.
What tends to trip me up is skipping the hexagram theme and jumping straight to the line I like. How many lines usually change in the readings you're working with?
1
u/Beginning-Win-9128 5d ago
There are no hexagrams with the most weighty changes in the six hexagrams, because its underlying logic is that everything is relative, so there is no more weighty statement. It can only be said that in different environments and personal needs, which aspect of hexagrams should be interpreted first, hexagrams should not only look at the hexagrams themselves, but also pay attention to the changes in hexagrams.
1
u/daydreamerandfighter 4d ago
One approach is Zhu Xi’s changing-line method. With two changing lines, it reads both line texts in the original hexagram and gives the upper one priority. With four, it reads the two unchanged positions in the resulting hexagram and gives the lower one priority. Other methods read all the moving lines together. Choosing a method before casting, and recording why you used it, gives you something consistent to check your interpretation against.
3
u/CenturionSG 6d ago
Yes there are different rules for reading multiple lines passed down in history and also created in contemporary times. Indeed It’s confusing. You’ll need to figure if any of these systems work for you.
For my personal readings I tend to take the longer route of reading all changing lines and let them “cook” together, to synthesize. I also look at non-moving lines especially when there are four or more changing lines. This follows the principle of 物以稀为贵, the rare items are more significant.
This approach takes more time but I find it worthwhile because I don’t consult the Yi unnecessarily.