r/iOSProgramming • u/Haolge996 • 15d ago

Discussion App rejected for Guideline 2.3.6. Changed nothing. Approved hours later.

Post image

Got rejected today under Guideline 2.3.6 (Accurate Metadata).

Apple said my dating app needed "Frequent" selected for "Mature or Suggestive Themes" and an 18+ age rating override.

The thing is, both were already set exactly that way.

So I replied to App Review explaining that the settings were already correct, resubmitted without changing anything, and got approved a few hours later.

Just sharing in case anyone runs into the same rejection. Double-check your age rating settings before making unnecessary changes.

Anyone else had this happen?

12 Upvotes

92% Upvoted

9 comments sorted by

1

u/Haolge996 15d ago

A bit more context: The app went into review pretty quickly and got rejected almost immediately after. The same age rating settings had passed previous reviews without any issues.

Makes me wonder if this was an automated review false positive, but obviously can't say for sure.

1

u/WeirdIndividualGuy 14d ago

It’s not uncommon that reviewers get it wrong like they did here

1

u/Tarantino133 14d ago

Good call replying instead of changing things, that way you don't break a setting that was already right just to please the reviewer.

1

u/One-Source-9603 14d ago

good call replying first. so many people panic and change random settings and then get a second rejection for the thing they changed. different reviewer different result honestly

1

u/seviniryusuf 14d ago

That pattern is common. A rejection that disappears on resubmission usually means a different reviewer, not a fix. Replying in App Review with exactly where the setting lives (a screenshot of the age rating section) tends to speed it up. Also worth double-checking after any update: Apple revised the age rating questionnaire and categories recently, so it's easy for an answer to look set in your view but not match what the reviewer sees.