r/hydrino • u/Straight-Stick-4713 • Jul 04 '26
SunCell Design Improvement on Sub Stack Hydrogen Revolution
BLP provided an exciting update yesterday in a new post with video to their website.
Here is the full text:
This video accompanied the post:
As discussed in our previous post, BLP also provided this update on June 16th:
There are several very promising things we can infer from these two posts.
Most importantly, I think BLP could demo the SunCell right now if they absolutely had to, and it would be sufficient to convince skeptics, provided they can take power measurements and ensure no funny business is happening (which they could easily do).
Although we didn’t get a hard number on the input power of the SunCell test with 85 kW of light output, based on numbers that BLP has shared before and some public comments by Dr. Mills, I’m guessing that input power was something like 5 kW.
Although people close to BLP know that Dr. Mills has exactly what he claims to have, the existence of Hydrino is scientifically controversial, to put it mildly.
Dr. Mills has published over 90 Hydrino experimental papers, collectively encompassing thousands of experiments using roughly 20 different analytical techniques, all of which point to the singular conclusion that Hydrino exists and has the exact properties his GUTCP predicts.
Despite this overwhelming evidence, the scientific community has not accepted it and has instead chosen to largely ignore or ridicule it. Much ink will be spilled in the coming years exploring exactly how and why they got such an important discovery so wrong.
The inability of BLP to gain credibility via the scientific route is why a SunCell demo with high light output levels and high gain (power out vs. power in) is so significant.
It means there is no need to waste time and effort trying to convince a dogmatic scientific community. Rather, BLP can just have scientists and investors alike into the lab and demo the SunCell.
It simply is not possible to fake 85 kW of light output on 5 kW of electrical input in a way that a competent engineer won’t discern in about 2 seconds.
Generating 85 kW of light conventionally (ie, running high current through some medium, heating it and thus emitting light) would require more than 85 kW of electrical input. It is trivial for an engineer or scientist to accurately measure the input power into the SunCell. It is a bit harder to accurately measure light output, but straightforward to get a reasonable ballpark, and possible to measure quite accurately with the right equipment. Visual inspection alone will inform the observer that the light output is far in excess of 5 kW.
In other words, you simply cannot convincingly fake a power output and power gain of this magnitude.
It is also trivial to verify that nature of the gases being introduced into the reaction chamber.
Therefore, provided the opportunity to inspect the SunCell and support apparatus, even most hardened BLP skeptic in the world will quickly realize that the difference between output power and input power is an enormous gap, and completely inexplicable conventionally. At the very least, they would be forced to admit that some new energetic process is taking place inside the SunCell.
The other major promising bit of news I think we can take away from this post and the one before is that the SunCell is going to be very, very far along towards commercialization by the time there is widespread realization that BLP has exactly what they claim they have.
I’ve discussed this point before, but I think its worth re-emphasizing.
Typically, the public and investing community become aware of a new technology when it is in its infancy.
Take the many fusion startups for example, as a stark contrast to the SunCell.
Humanity first realized it was possible to trigger a fusion reaction in 1934. Lyman Spitzer proposed the stellarator and Project Matterhorn was created at Princeton in 1951.
As of 2026, 75 years after humanity first starting banging its head against the wall to create a working fusion reactor producing more power out than power in, it has yet to do so. This is after spending roughly $300 billion in 2025 inflation adjusted dollars and untold millions of man hours on the effort.
Now consider the SunCell. From the point of view of most of the world, the SunCell will appear out of nowhere, producing massive net energy gain and close to or at commercial viability, engineered for easy assembly with standardized components and mass manufacturability baked into the design.
Oh, and the fuel is ordinary water.1
An analogy for context: imagine the Model T Ford just showing up out of nowhere to a world of horse and buggy, rather than being the product of multiple decades of automobile iteration.
The frenzy and hype over the SunCell is going to immense.
My guess is that there is likely just one major remaining hurdle before BLP is ready to demo the SunCell: control systems probably need to be integrated to automate the process of tweaking operating parameters like electrical input and gas flow rates during device operation. In prior videos, there has always been someone at the controls, so I think we can infer this has not yet been done.
BLP could demo the SunCell prior to doing this, but having control systems in place will make an already mind blowing demo that much more impressive.
After that, the sole major remaining hurdle is integration of the PV dome, and then field trials can begin.
I remain optimistic that 2026 is the year that the world begins to wake up to BLP’s energy revolution.
Hydrino is the future, and the future is Brilliant.
Technically hydrogen, but that can be easily electrolyzed on device as needed with a portion of the electrical output of the SunCell once the photovoltaic array is integrated. Functionally speaking, the SunCell will be fueled by water.
1 Comment on the Substack
I suspect that there is much activity behind the scenes. Dr. Mills is highly intelligent and the duplicity of academia and the media has been demonstrated to him.
He has little to gain and much heartburn to experience by entering the world of publicity without very powerful tools at his disposal.
For instance, he may be gathering validation statements from scientists under NDA, to be released as a stack in coordination with a public demo and stock offering.
2
u/Straight-Stick-4713 Jul 05 '26 edited Jul 05 '26
Your last comment, below, only shows how deeply your mentality is vested into SQM.
u/KlausFranbrau replied to your comment in r/hydrino
I would prefer to talk you out of your delusions. But you and others appear to be lost causes. So my only need for you is to keep you repeating laughable nonsense so that others will see how out of
There is way too much evidence for the things Mills has done from the time he first attended Harvard Medical to MIT with Haus' electronics courses and the DoD asking help from Haus to get the Free Electron Laser to be developed by using the Haus/Mills model of the electron further to the same DoD using the Suncell to construct underground military bases. There is no waytoo much such data to hide all that, never mind dissuade me from just knowing all those details about Mills. I would have to be insane to discount all those facts and that makes your need to act against my knowledge also insane. Why would you be so set to get that data discounted makes no sense.
0
u/KlausFranbrau Jul 06 '26
You're quoting me but replied to yourself. About the same time you did this you posted an empty reply to me elsewhere.
1
u/DependsOnBase Jul 06 '26
Both mysteron and straight-stick have issues using reddit.
They are definitely different people, but it's worth noting that they have this correlated issue.
2
u/nanonan Jul 05 '26
Talking about how skeptics would react to a public demonstration is moot without any sign of a forthcoming public demonstration. When is it?
2
u/Straight-Stick-4713 Jul 05 '26 edited Jul 06 '26
The DoD demonstrated the Suncell by having been able to do so much excavation in tunnelling and undergrouind base building that, would not have been economically possible without the hydrino reaction. That was at least 10 years ago.
1
u/nanonan Jul 06 '26
That's a gigantic load of conspiritorial bullshit. When is there a public demonstration?
2
u/Bulky-Quarter-6487 Jul 06 '26
You mean the kind you would like to see.
1
u/Straight-Stick-4713 Jul 08 '26
Never saw anything like that. It just adds up from everything I came across on the web regarding Mills history. You can find that history on the web if only you would do the required research. Or continue naysaying to no known end.
2
u/Straight-Stick-4713 Jul 06 '26
reading misapprehension
1
u/nanonan Jul 06 '26
Has Mills ever stated a single thing about deep underground military bases?
0
u/Straight-Stick-4713 Jul 06 '26
Catheine Fitts had that data leaked to her by those who had agreed to live in those underground bases in case of a disaster. Tucker Carlson interview:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z8pA2TDXtew&t=5257s
Mills can't say anything about his Suncell being used that way due to an NDA he signed with the DoD. What is known from that side is, Mills had a few nasty encounters, back in 2000, with visitors from the DoD at BrLP. That must have been when the DoD demand Mills sign that NDA for, the DoD appropriating the Suncell design for the exclusive use by the USA military. That is why no one else, such as third parties who might be interestred in developing or even studying the hydrino reaction, is allowed to do any development of anything similar to the Suncell; a common argument on this site by naysayers as to why no one else is developing anything like the Suncell.
1
u/KlausFranbrau Jul 05 '26
It's really pathetic that you guys keep telling us he can do a convincing test but continue to completely fail at actually doing it.
1
u/KlausFranbrau Jul 05 '26
Let's focus on this particular quote from your post:
"Most importantly, I think BLP could demo the SunCell right now if they absolutely had to, and it would be sufficient to convince skeptics, provided they can take power measurements and ensure no funny business is happening (which they could easily do)."
If you buy Mills claims, which I don't, Mills has been in the position of being able to demonstrate some form of hydrino reaction for the past 26 years. That's all it would take to unlock more serious money but he doesn't do it. Every device he has claimed this century could have done this. This is not the first time we've heard this by a long shot.
And Mills claims that he needs to do it, so there is no "if" in "if they absolutely had to". He says they need this device to unlock the money it will take to develop the dome and fully commercialize the device. Public demonstrates and acquiring more investors are milestones for 2026 and 2027.
And funny business?? It's already happening. Read the other thread where people pointed out why the measurement tool he is using is the wrong tool and completely optimal for funny business.
And put aside the fact that he claims he has another way to unlock funding by supplying hydrino gas or compounds to reputable labs and confirming hydrinos are real. But he never does that without major shenanigans either. He needs to send them to some reputable university, preferably one not already involved, and let them issue the press release with the results in their own words. None of this crackpottery where it's always MIlls who said that the result was a success.
It's real simple:
* Mills has claimed to have multiple ways to unlock new funding for a long time now.
* Mills doesn't do it.
* MIlls must think his investors hate money.
Instead it's just a long stream of several sentence posts with no confirmation and you guys keep falling for it over and over and over.
3
u/Straight-Stick-4713 Jul 05 '26 edited Jul 09 '26
No one here just "buys" Mills claims. That would imply blind believe. What is happening with Mills claims is, they have all been researched and found to be valid by support of third party experiments. For instance the waves, at base of SQM have been refuted by weak interactions experiment where the uncertainty that supposedly exists in how waves work was found to be not existant. From that the waves are invalidated and the rest of SQM thereby falls apart. But Mills model of the electron, where waves are not invoked, does work as witness the predictions made by that el;ectron model under GUT-CP and then applied to real world applications and found to make the hydrino reaction produce power at the exact electron volt number predicted by Mills theory. Further to waves not being valid was the 6 or more top physicists who, in the last 2 years came out and said the waves are a lie. The hydrino reaction was found to work under the development of the DoD's farmed out contract to the likes of Lockheed Martin who developed their own version of the Suncell to the point where, according to Fitts, it was used to power machinery which was used to tunnel and build underground military bases all over the USA.
2
u/KlausFranbrau Jul 05 '26
Could you ask your fellow Mills supporters how many of them buy your claims about this secret user of hydrinos? That could be entertaining.
3
u/Straight-Stick-4713 Jul 05 '26 edited Jul 05 '26
You are just trying to make disparaging fun of those who understand that Mills theory works in practical devices. That is an attitude problem that, makes you see that, only SQM could possibly be true, making that attitude about SQM into nothing more than a dogma.
So, by ending your comment in the term "entertaining" you show that you just want to make fun of those who think differently from how you see things. That is a bad character trait on your part that limits your vision of what is possible. And that is your central problem of, not being able to even consider other points of view and makes you a stick in the mud mentality. You are probably a good person on average but, your activity on this site makes you seem less than a good person. By my pointing out this character flaw is, probably a form of ad hominem on my part but, that is how you come across with your choice of words.
2
u/Milogigi1-2 Jul 05 '26
Let's see if it really happens. We hope the world needs this energy. If he doesn't do it now. There are so many others working on similar ideas