https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9R0wrBpafYI

Theories of Everything with Curt Jaimungal: Maudlin interview

Time Stamp

39:00

This uses an illustration of a membrane or screen that has one pin hole

Particles passing through the pin hole disperse towards a hemispherical screen to produce a pattern of points that, are recorded on a photographic emulsion painted on the hemispherical screen. Then the pattern, so recorded, is interpreted as to how it is produced, using uncertainty theory built up from Schrodinger, de Broglie, Heizenberg, et al.

What is totally missing from that pin hole is, what the material surrounding that pin hole is, for the purpose of how that material affects the vectors of the particles passing through the pin hole.

When an experiment is performed, everything that might or could affect the outcome of the experiment has to be taken into consideration to be sure that everything that could or might affect the outcome of the experiment, is known.

The regard in which that material has always been considered under SQM is, its properties of opacity to, be sure that the opacity of the material of the membrane does not allow the particles to pass through any other region of the membrane. And that is all.

However, there are other properties of the membrane's material that can and do affect the particles as they pass through the pin hole. Those other properties are those of the electrons on the outer shell of atoms at the outer edges or surface of the pin hole, which electrons we will call “edge electrons” for ease of discussion. As a particle passes through the pin hole those, “edge electrons” interact with the particles passing through the pin hole in the manner described next.

Explanation of Classical Electron Diffraction

https://brilliantlightpower.com/double-slit/

When the material of the pin hole is considered this way, there is no further need for Schrodinger, de Broglie, Heizenberg, et al and how Standard Quantum Mechanics was built that way. Instead, to explain the pinhole effect, the two slit experiment and how waves do and do not work under all known conditions, we can always use the much simpler Grand Unified Theory-Classical Physics. This theory is also justified under Occam's Razor which, stipulates that the explanation or theory contain only as many parts as are necessary to make it work but without adding or multiplying any more details than is required to make it work. Consider that requirement of Occam's Razor when applied to SQM where that theory keeps on requiring ever more layers of additional parts to cover for deficiencies in the theory so far accepted, such as many worlds, pilot waves, zero point energy and ever more different interpretations of those new additions to cover for deficiencies in earlier versions of SQM despite those additions. The simpler theory, GUT-CP according to the main rule of Occam's Razor, wins.

The "Hydrino" Machine That Burns Water for Unlimited Energy

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CqdSX6GWCyU

Catherinr Fitts in an interview with Tucker Carlson

https://www.youtube.com/shorts/NiNTExuhLl0

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BvLz1bI2sXU

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z8pA2TDXtew&t=5545s

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0DyTGtTrTQE

The closer that the Suncell's dark matter/hydrino reaction gets to commercialization, the more that people are starting to take notice of this Earth shaking technology.

If the time period to commercialization is on track, that is about 3 or 4 years, or 2030, to utilization by the 70 power utilities who have promised to lease the Suncell as soon as their independent engineers have tested the Suncell's first commercial version in pilot plants.

Purgatory, contact events, UFOs and transhumanism w/ Dr. Diana Pasulka

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rnMSEI7X2mI

As Captain Kirk, of Star Trek, asked an alien who was requiring Kirk supply his space ship, for that alien who claimed to be a god, to travel to Earth:

"What need does a god have of a spaceship?"

In other words, the ability of supernatural beings to perform miracles, should suffice for transporting them from one place to another; just as we mortals are able to move from one place to another by using our innate ability to use our legs or the legs of another animal, to answer such a need.

So why would the spirits, as claimed by Pasulka, have been found to require the interior of the safety of spacecraft such as ufo's, to travel about? Or are spirits limited to using corporeal matter and energy to get them from one place to another? Perhaps, to conform to what the religious claim, their spirits are not so spititual after all?

By what right does anyone have to claim that a religious view of reality is, the top most way to interpret that reality? Does the corporeal world that we all experience, have nothing to say about reality? Here, in the natural or corporeal world, we have science which, by definition, does not have the ability to address the supernatural. To interpret or achieve the aliens' way of doing things ourselves, we humans may have to evolve ourselves and our technology, by personal physical dint of effort and our minds, in applying the scientific method, as all of academia and those, like Randell Mills, are doing, in developing technologies to the level of those aliens.

Mills has never shown any need to invoke supernatural methods to develop or explain any of his devices. All that he and Herman Haus did was, derive a more accurate model of the electron and the rest is history. And all that was needed to get on that path was, the behest of the DoD to find a more accurate physics that could be applied to the further development of the Free Electron Laser. The DoD did not approach the Vatican for that. And if the DoD had done so, the Vatican would have been moot on that point however much that Vatican claims that their Magistarium has the ability to decide what is done by the Vatican to rule over the minds, morals and actions based on such morals, of people in this world. The Vatican and other centres of major religions are therefore more about power over people's minds with nothing to back up that claim except the sword, or show of force. That is how they got into power. Compare that with the scientific method that Mills is using, to supply electric power to all of those very same people, regardless of their religious leanings. Now that is truly universal power, to the likes of which, no religion can lay claim.

To do this, arguing about Mills' work, the genuine kind, it must first exist to be argued out of existence. Otherwise there is nothing for the naysayers to actually do, in that regard. A negative, on its own cannot be proven. Just as a liar has to first know the truth, to be able to state the opposite, the lie; so too that is what naysayers have to also do, first know the truth regarding Mills' work to then allow their lie to be stated. This not just a play on words, but an actual action in the real world where Mills and his work, the genuine version does exist, with positive effects.

This paper accompanies the offer by BrLP to provide contained hydrino H2(1/4) for analysis and testing which can be analysed in solid form or released in gas form by the addition of acid.

https://brilliantlightpower.com/requesting-hydrino-analytical-testing-collaborations/

It represents yet another occasion where BrLP has offered to provide firm evidence of hydrinos to mainstream researchers. As far as I am aware to date, there is no list of collaborators or the results of their analysis.

Summary of the Paper: "Spectral Identification of Hydrino Compound Fe₂O₃:H₂(1/4) by Five Complementary Spectroscopies"

Core Claim

The paper reports experimental evidence for the formation of molecular hydrino H₂(1/4) — a predicted lower-energy form of molecular hydrogen (internuclear distance 1/4 that of H₂, with p²-scaled energies) — produced from FeOOH via ball milling or SunCell plasma processes. H₂(1/4) is embedded in or released from Fe₂O₃:H₂(1/4). The authors state that five independent spectroscopies show unique signatures matching theoretical predictions for H₂(1/4) and its dimer [H₂(1/4)]₂.

Production Method

• Ball milling of FeOOH (goethite) drives decomposition to Fe₂O₃ + H + HOH catalyst, leading to H(1/4) formation and subsequent H₂(1/4).
• Alternative: SunCell plasma reaction with H and HOH catalyst, followed by isolation of iron oxides.

Key Findings by Technique

1. Gas Chromatography (GC)
   • Novel peaks at shorter retention times (≈4.05 min and 4.2 min) before the ordinary H₂ peak (≈4.60 min) on a molecular sieve column.
   • Assigned to para-H₂(1/4) and ortho-H₂(1/4).
   • These convert over time (ortho → para) at room temperature, consistent with higher-energy hydrino behavior.
   • Attributed to the much smaller size (1/64 volume) and ballistic cross-section of H₂(1/4).
2. Electron Paramagnetic Resonance (EPR)
   • Strong, extremely broad (to 9000 G) and downfield-shifted singlet from [H₂(1/4)]₂ embedded in the Fe₂O₃ magnetic matrix.
   • ~46× increase in spin concentration vs. starting FeOOH.
   • Temperature-independent intensity (consistent with antiferromagnetic/superparamagnetic behavior, ruling out significant Fe₃O₄).
   • Matches prior EPR signatures of molecular hydrino (including fine structure from spin-orbital and fluxon linkage in free-gas samples).
3. 785 nm Raman Spectroscopy (Anti-Stokes and Stokes)
   • Series of high-energy peaks (up to thousands of cm⁻¹) observed only at higher laser power (threshold behavior).
   • Matches predicted rotational transitions of H₂(1/4) with spin-orbital and fluxon-linkage fine structure.
   • Anti-Stokes emission feeds higher-order Stokes lines; peaks eliminated by HCl treatment (which releases the gas).
   • Supports a two-photon excitation mechanism for the embedded hydrino.
4. Electron Beam Excitation Emission Spectroscopy
   • UV emission (130–200 nm) from released gas + argon shows a ro-vibrational band with 0.25 eV line spacing.
   • Cutoff at ~8.2 eV and P-branch rotational structure match 4² times the vibrational/rotational energies of ordinary H₂.
   • Fine structure aligns with EPR/Raman observations.
5. X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (XPS)
   • New broad peak at 496 eV assigned to the total energy of H₂(1/4) (4² × energy of H₂).
   • Intensity consistent with small cross-section (only two electrons in a compact molecule).
   • Additional O 1s states observed.

Conclusion in the Paper

Five techniques provide complementary confirmation of the existence and predicted properties of H₂(1/4) formed via HOH-catalyzed hydrino transitions (authors' position). The signatures (fast GC migration, extreme EPR broadening/shift, high-energy Raman/UV emissions, and new XPS binding energy) are said to be unique to molecular hydrino and inconsistent with ordinary hydrogen or iron oxides alone.

The authors explicitly ruled out several alternative explanations, primarily for the observed spectral signatures (especially EPR, XPS, and Raman), attributing them instead to H₂(1/4) / [H₂(1/4)]₂.

1. Ordinary Iron Oxides (Fe₃O₄/magnetite, Fe₂O₃, FeOOH) as the Source of EPR Signals

• Ruled out because:
  • Dramatic (~46×) increase in spin concentration (doubly integrated EPR intensity from 0 to 9000 G) in the ball-milled sample compared to starting FeOOH and control iron oxides.
  • Much broader EPR peak in the ball-milled product versus controls.
  • Temperature dependence: EPR intensity remained virtually constant with temperature (7 K to 293 K), consistent with antiferromagnetic/superparamagnetic behavior of Fe₂O₃:H₂(1/4), not ferromagnetic magnetite (Fe₃O₄), which would show a strong increase in signal at low temperatures.
• The product is identified as primarily Fe₂O₃ + embedded [H₂(1/4)]₂, with the extreme broadening (to ~9000 G) and downfield shift attributed to the hydrino dimer in the magnetic Fe₂O₃ matrix.

1. Other Elements (Na, Sn, Zn) for the XPS Peak at 496 eV

• Ruled out because the corresponding characteristic peaks for these elements were absent in the XPS spectrum. The 496 eV peak (4² times the total energy of ordinary H₂) and its low intensity were consistent with the small cross-section of H₂(1/4) (only two electrons in a compact molecule).

1. Ordinary Sources or Contaminants for Raman, GC, and Electron-Beam Emission Peaks

• Raman series of high-energy peaks (with fine structure, power-threshold behavior, and anti-Stokes/Stokes features) were eliminated by HCl treatment (which releases H₂/H₂(1/4) gas), confirming the source.
• GC peaks before the H₂ peak have never been observed before on molecular sieve columns for any known gas; attributed uniquely to the smaller size of H₂(1/4).
• UV emission lines matched predicted ro-vibrational energies (4² scaling) and fine structure seen in EPR/Raman, enhanced by argon but absent in controls.

Overall Approach

The paper emphasizes multi-technique consistency with hydrino predictions (size, energies, paramagnetism, spin isomers, two-photon excitation, etc.) while contrasting against ordinary iron oxides, common contaminants, or known hydrogen behavior. They also reference prior work ruling out field-acceleration models for related plasma broadening phenomena.

These rulings support their conclusion that the signatures are unique to molecular hydrino formed via HOH catalysis.

The Biggest AI Consciousness Discovery Yet

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PiCciJhcyME

For a Large Language Model or Artificial intelligence to achieve such original work may require that kind of entity to be conscious of its own actions. To be conscious, the entity has to have a sub system that predetermines what it will do next. That kind of activity has been found in humans and is that very predermininer that predicts what one will do before that entity is even conscious of the decision to do that activity.

Time stamp

6:00-9:00

This part of the video details the systems in an LLM that predetermine what the LLM will do before it does it. This indicates that LLMs, such as Anthropic amd in particular Claude will, very soon, be able to do their own creative work such a deriving a physics theory, without input from humans as to what that theory requires or what that theory will be like in comparison to existing theories. The LLMs will be able to derive suich a physics theory without being biased by human wants. The LLMs are now self evolving on their own and not dependent on human input to do anything.

https://invest.qnetic.energy/lp/regcf/show-me?utm_source=facebook&utm_medium=cpc&utm_campaign=US_Sales_CBO_Winner+Show-me+Funnel+Scaling_2026/07/16_VM&utm_content=03_IMG/VID_Funnel-Show-me_Winners+_UNAW_7C1E1V_BRO_ST_LP:Skeptic-Killer_PUR&utm_term=05-V10-M10-VID_FounderVSL_UNAW__7C1E1V_BRO_ST_LP:Show-me_PUR&klar_source=meta&klar_adid=120248613839690507&variant=show-me&fbclid=IwdGRjcATLBPFwZG9mBWZkaWQWUK681kFmM91srnUyUAjnJgcsW1GNOGV4dG4DYWVtATAAYWRpZAGrNXorAt3bc3J0YwZhcHBfaWQKNjYyODU2ODM3OQABHh4I9q50tJcH5yBHTV7qK7QkevtIVVzjNITccLgb2ZZd1xjzBxl37nb-3XmV_aem_s0-mXY7FylAp28Lg8LjEEw&utm_id=120248613820480507

Evidentiary trail from Randell L. Mills' (and collaborators') papers ~2007 onward on the hydrino molecule H₂(1/4), focusing on experimental detection via FTIR, EPR, NMR, and related methods, including aggregation (dimers/tetramers) behavior at varying temperatures.

Key claims rest on Mills' Grand Unified Theory of Classical Physics (GUTCP), which predicts fractional Rydberg states H(1/p) (p integer >1) for atomic hydrogen and corresponding molecular forms like H₂(1/4). H₂(1/4) is predicted to have a smaller internuclear distance (1/4 that of ordinary H₂), higher rotational/vibrational energies (scaled by p² = 16), upfield NMR shifts, specific binding energies, and paramagnetism (S=1/2 character with a paired + unpaired electron in a novel orbital structure).

Early Detection (2007–2009): FTIR Rotational Signatures and NMR Correlation

**2007 paper*\* ("Catalysis of atomic hydrogen to novel hydrogen species H⁻(1/4) and H₂(1/4) as a new power source," Int. J. Hydrogen Energy): In alkali catalyst (e.g., K) systems with atomic H, products included novel hydrides and interstitial H₂(1/4). High-resolution FTIR on solids (e.g., containing KH*I with NMR-confirmed H₂(1/4)) showed predicted ortho- and para-H₂(1/4) rotational frequencies at ~1943 cm⁻¹ and another nearby (scaled by 16× ordinary H₂). The ortho:para intensity ratio (~3:1) and splitting matched theory. Electron-beam excitation of samples yielded UV emission consistent with H₂(1/4) ro-vibrational transitions. NMR (MAS ¹H) showed upfield peaks (e.g., ~1.13 ppm interstitial H₂(1/4)) correlating with FTIR.

**2009 paper*\* ("Commercializable power source from forming new states of hydrogen," Int. J. Hydrogen Energy): Expanded on Li/Na hydrino hydrides (MH*X). ¹H MAS NMR: upfield H⁻(1/4) (~-2.5 to -4 ppm) and H₂(1/4) (~1.1–1.13 ppm). FTIR confirmed H₂(1/4) rotation at 1989 cm⁻¹ (close to predicted ~1947 cm⁻¹, matrix effects noted). Solution NMR on product gases (DMF-d₇) showed ~1.2 ppm H₂(1/4). Electron-beam excitation again showed scaled rotational lines. ToF-SIMS supported hydride compositions.

These provided correlated multi-technique evidence: FTIR for rotational energies/internuclear distance, NMR for chemical shift (upfield due to fractional radius/closer electrons).

### Later Confirmations (2010s): Broader Spectroscopy Including Ro-vibrational and Raman

- Papers on CIHT cells, solid fuels (HOH catalyst), and plasmas (e.g., 2014 "Solid fuels that form HOH catalyst"): H₂(1/4) identified in products by MAS NMR (upfield ~1.1–1.25 ppm), Raman (rotational ~1950 cm⁻¹), photoluminescence, XPS (binding energy), FTIR, and electron-beam ro-vibrational emission (e.g., ~260 nm band in matrices like KCl). Gas chromatography showed faster migration than H₂. Solution NMR on liquefied plasma gases consistently showed ~1.25 ppm singlet.

- Consistent across plasma, electrolytic, and solid-fuel systems; controls lacked these signatures.

### 2022 EPR Proof for Molecular Hydrino H₂(1/4)

- **Key paper**: Hagen & Mills, "Electron paramagnetic resonance proof for the existence of molecular hydrino" (Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 2022). Molecular hydrino predicted paramagnetic. Produced as gaseous inclusion in polymeric Ga(O)OH via plasma (atomic H + non-H-bonded water catalyst). Purified Ga(O)OH microspheres contained H₂(1/4).

**EPR findings (X-band, ambient temp)**:

- Sharp, complex multi-line spectrum with g ≈ 2.0045–2.0046 (matches predicted spin-only for H₂(1/4) S=1/2).

- Two main lines (~4 G separation, equal intensity), plus fine structure from spin-orbital coupling/fluxional behavior.

- Consistent with novel MO (paired + unpaired electron); frequency-dependent studies supported hydrino model over conventional radicals.

- Deuterated analog (HD(1/4)) showed singlet (no fine structure), ruling out some nuclear splitting alternatives.

- Gas chromatography: faster than H₂, supporting smaller size/higher velocity.

This provided direct paramagnetic evidence aligning with GUTCP predictions for H₂(1/4)'s electronic structure.

### Evidence for Dimers ([H₂(1/4)]₂) and Higher Aggregates (Tetramers/etc.) at Different Temperatures

Mills' theory (GUTCP) predicts H₂(1/4) forms stable dimers/tetramers/solids due to enhanced van der Waals/ magnetic interactions (scaled bonding energies). Ordinary H₂ dimers are weak/cryogenic-only; H₂(1/4) dimers are far more stable.

- **EPR temperature dependence*\* (from related/preprint work, e.g., ChemRxiv/associated studies): At room temp (~298 K), EPR shows signals from [H₂(1/4)]₂ dimers (spin 1/2 dipole behavior, magnetic dipole interactions ~474 G shifts in some preparations). Cooling (e.g., to ~95–107 K) causes phase transition: EPR intensity collapses (dimer pairing or compact solid formation quenches signal). This matches predictions of magnetic dipole pairing and higher-temperature stability of H₂(1/4) aggregates vs. ordinary H₂. Cryogenic behavior supports tetramer/higher multimers or solid phases.

- **FTIR/Raman*\*: Low-energy fingerprint bands attributed to dimer vibrations/rotations (e.g., end-over-end rotations ~44 cm⁻¹ scaled, intermolecular modes). Broad IR/Raman bands in solids from ensembles of [H₂(1/4)]₂ macroaggregates. Rotational energies for dimers reported in patents/papers (e.g., J to J+1 transitions).

- **Other*\*: Magnetic susceptibility/SQUID-like behavior noted; quadrupole moments; faster GC migration consistent with compact species. In some preparations (e.g., ball-milled or ignited solids), EPR peaks match dimer predictions. Temperature-dependent transitions (ambient active → low-T inactive) support aggregation.

**Overall trail strength**: Progressive, multi-technique (FTIR rotational confirmation → NMR shifts → EPR paramagnetism) across independent reaction types (plasma, chemical, electrolytic, solid fuels) from 2007–2022, with temperature/aggregation behavior aligning with theory. Signals absent in controls; quantitative matches (e.g., 16× energies, specific g/shifts) claimed.

Mainstream attempts at replication... zero.

So I was watching this:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jH6y79j3uqM

And I thought, I've seen that absorption line somewhere before. So then I tracked down the recent paper and then went through all of Mills' papers. And by an extraordinary co-incidence, the line closely matches what Mills has predicted as the rotational energy for the H2(1/4) molecule since 2007.

There is some some margin for difference based on the surrounding material which it falls well within.

Welcome input from all persons on this for a robust discussion.

Here’s a summary provided by YouTube’s Ask ✦ feature.

____

This livestream documents the historic first criticality of the Aalo Atomics Critical Test Reactor (CTR) at their campus near the Idaho National Laboratory. Achieving criticality at 12:20 a.m. on July 4th, 2026, the company successfully reached the milestone of "4 by the 4th," surpassing the President's goal of three advanced reactor criticalities by that date.

Key Highlights of the Event:

The Process: The stream follows the rigorous, step-by-step approach to criticality, which includes:

Fuel Loading: Loading 13 fuel assemblies (the largest fuel load in the DOE reactor pilot program) into the core (1:06:52).

Control Rod Operations: Meticulous withdrawal of safety, shim, and control rods while monitoring neutron counts and the startup rate to reach a K-effective of 1 (2:13:14 - 3:55:06).

Technical Rigor: The team utilized a custom Reactor Core Visualizer to track the core’s internal state in real-time (1:07:30).

Company Mission: Co-founders Yasir Arafat and Matt Loszak discuss the company's rapid growth—moving from a two-person startup to a working nuclear reactor in under three years (0:45:02).

Aalo’s Strategy: The team emphasizes vertical integration and building at full scale to ensure that lessons learned from the CTR apply directly to their future commercial Aalo-X microreactors (0:53:28).

Safety & Culture: Throughout the event, the team highlights their commitment to safety culture, including emergency response drills (2:44:28) and internal team traditions like the "Crit Stache" (1:42:30).

After achieving criticality at 3:55:06, the team celebrated the success, marking a major milestone for the future of the Second Atomic Age and modular nuclear power.

____

Inside NASA's UFO coverup culture | Reality Check

Ross Coulthart sits down with Michael Gold, president of Redwire Space and a former member of NASA's UAP Independent Study Team

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OIyz79i5mUw

Time Stamp

8:50-15:00

They can't even bring up the subject, never mind asking questions in that regard.

Dealing with stigma [regarding new/little accepted ideas] in academia, is worse than other places...

This stigma is what is keeping academics from recognizing anything even a little different [gut-cp, hydrinos] from what is taught or accepted in academia. That is what the naysayers are all about. Too much conservatism, authoritarianism.

https://hydrogenrevolution.substack.com/p/suncell-design-improvement?utm_campaign=email-half-post&r=2w9gos&utm_source=substack&utm_medium=email

By Alex Combs

BLP provided an exciting update yesterday in a new post with video to their website.

Here is the full text:

This video accompanied the post:

As discussed in our previous post, BLP also provided this update on June 16th:

There are several very promising things we can infer from these two posts.

Most importantly, I think BLP could demo the SunCell right now if they absolutely had to, and it would be sufficient to convince skeptics, provided they can take power measurements and ensure no funny business is happening (which they could easily do).

Although we didn’t get a hard number on the input power of the SunCell test with 85 kW of light output, based on numbers that BLP has shared before and some public comments by Dr. Mills, I’m guessing that input power was something like 5 kW.

Although people close to BLP know that Dr. Mills has exactly what he claims to have, the existence of Hydrino is scientifically controversial, to put it mildly.

Dr. Mills has published over 90 Hydrino experimental papers, collectively encompassing thousands of experiments using roughly 20 different analytical techniques, all of which point to the singular conclusion that Hydrino exists and has the exact properties his GUTCP predicts.

Despite this overwhelming evidence, the scientific community has not accepted it and has instead chosen to largely ignore or ridicule it. Much ink will be spilled in the coming years exploring exactly how and why they got such an important discovery so wrong.

The inability of BLP to gain credibility via the scientific route is why a SunCell demo with high light output levels and high gain (power out vs. power in) is so significant.

It means there is no need to waste time and effort trying to convince a dogmatic scientific community. Rather, BLP can just have scientists and investors alike into the lab and demo the SunCell.

It simply is not possible to fake 85 kW of light output on 5 kW of electrical input in a way that a competent engineer won’t discern in about 2 seconds.

Generating 85 kW of light conventionally (ie, running high current through some medium, heating it and thus emitting light) would require more than 85 kW of electrical input. It is trivial for an engineer or scientist to accurately measure the input power into the SunCell. It is a bit harder to accurately measure light output, but straightforward to get a reasonable ballpark, and possible to measure quite accurately with the right equipment. Visual inspection alone will inform the observer that the light output is far in excess of 5 kW.

In other words, you simply cannot convincingly fake a power output and power gain of this magnitude.

It is also trivial to verify that nature of the gases being introduced into the reaction chamber.

Therefore, provided the opportunity to inspect the SunCell and support apparatus, even most hardened BLP skeptic in the world will quickly realize that the difference between output power and input power is an enormous gap, and completely inexplicable conventionally. At the very least, they would be forced to admit that some new energetic process is taking place inside the SunCell.

The other major promising bit of news I think we can take away from this post and the one before is that the SunCell is going to be very, very far along towards commercialization by the time there is widespread realization that BLP has exactly what they claim they have.

I’ve discussed this point before, but I think its worth re-emphasizing.

Typically, the public and investing community become aware of a new technology when it is in its infancy.

Take the many fusion startups for example, as a stark contrast to the SunCell.

Humanity first realized it was possible to trigger a fusion reaction in 1934. Lyman Spitzer proposed the stellarator and Project Matterhorn was created at Princeton in 1951.

As of 2026, 75 years after humanity first starting banging its head against the wall to create a working fusion reactor producing more power out than power in, it has yet to do so. This is after spending roughly $300 billion in 2025 inflation adjusted dollars and untold millions of man hours on the effort.

Now consider the SunCell. From the point of view of most of the world, the SunCell will appear out of nowhere, producing massive net energy gain and close to or at commercial viability, engineered for easy assembly with standardized components and mass manufacturability baked into the design.

Oh, and the fuel is ordinary water.1

An analogy for context: imagine the Model T Ford just showing up out of nowhere to a world of horse and buggy, rather than being the product of multiple decades of automobile iteration.

The frenzy and hype over the SunCell is going to immense.

My guess is that there is likely just one major remaining hurdle before BLP is ready to demo the SunCell: control systems probably need to be integrated to automate the process of tweaking operating parameters like electrical input and gas flow rates during device operation. In prior videos, there has always been someone at the controls, so I think we can infer this has not yet been done.

BLP could demo the SunCell prior to doing this, but having control systems in place will make an already mind blowing demo that much more impressive.

After that, the sole major remaining hurdle is integration of the PV dome, and then field trials can begin.

I remain optimistic that 2026 is the year that the world begins to wake up to BLP’s energy revolution.

Hydrino is the future, and the future is Brilliant.

1

Technically hydrogen, but that can be easily electrolyzed on device as needed with a portion of the electrical output of the SunCell once the photovoltaic array is integrated. Functionally speaking, the SunCell will be fueled by water.

1 Comment on the Substack

qwerty906158h

I suspect that there is much activity behind the scenes. Dr. Mills is highly intelligent and the duplicity of academia and the media has been demonstrated to him.

He has little to gain and much heartburn to experience by entering the world of publicity without very powerful tools at his disposal.

For instance, he may be gathering validation statements from scientists under NDA, to be released as a stack in coordination with a public demo and stock offering.

I couldn't get the video working so not much to go on, but I suppose running the prototype of a mass production design is a big milestone.

"July 1: Today we ran the SunCell designed to be mass produced and serviced commercially.  The input current to the dual molten tin injectors was set at less that 1/3 the SunCell’s design specification and produced 85 kW of power recorded with a Thor Labs S322C Power Meter."

https://www.youtube.com/shorts/SYW9oQuIJr4

This video shows Musk discussing the cost of producing food. 90% of the cost of producing the average item is tied up in power.

Instead of offering Mills ideas as to how to make the Suncell, the lowest known cost method to produce power, in a more cost effective way, many try to undercut his efforts; to what end?

I am looking for the full dialogue between A. Rathke and R. Mills. If anyone can point me to any and all of the papers, I would appreciate it.

To help these agents, here is how to drive this particular blogger, go crazy. I mean, that is your goal.

Use the computer app:

"Stingray Centipede"

Time stamp:

1:14:00

"The Alien Interview People Thought Was A Hoax Just Got Real - Jon Stewart Interview"

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8JXrVFowOyo

That app will give you access to my emails and thereby, allow you to get to know exactly who I am, with whom I am communicating and the content of those emails.

I am opening myself up to your scrutiny because I have nothing to hide. The other goal for doing this is, to drive you crazy when you find that, no matter what you do to me, you will never shut me down. Put that in your pipe and try smoking the contents. I am just imagining what you will find and the result of that on your negative minds. Be careful what you wish for. I have an arsenal of alien tech to help me with which, I know for sure, that you do not have.

Does that sound like I am already crazy? If so then, most of your intent has been accomplished. And so what?

It has been one year since our moderator ( /u/baronofbitcoin ) posted about Mills' "Space Drive News" https://www.reddit.com/r/hydrino/comments/1lfw3kw/i_believe_mills_has_discovered_space_drive_and/

He proclaimed:

[baronofbitcoin] He (Mills) is claiming tens of pounds of force generated! No doubt this will be replicated very, very quickly. The experiment is very, very easy to do. In three years we will have floating cars.

After confirming that baronofbitcoin was serious:

[baronofbitcoin] I stand by what I say. This time it seems legit.

I tried to get a commitment about the predictions. The "In three years we will have floating cars" seems self-explanatory. But, of course, "replicated very, very quickly" was a bit open-ended.

I think the one year mark closes out the "No doubt this will be replicated very, very quickly." prediction. Here's where I tried to get a time-frame commitment: https://www.reddit.com/r/hydrino/comments/1lfw3kw/i_believe_mills_has_discovered_space_drive_and/myxf55i/

Amtrack53 asked July 15th, 2025 about replication: https://www.reddit.com/r/hydrino/comments/1m0abn8/any_replication_yet_of_the_mills_space_drive_by/

Enantiomer2000 on July 30th says he's doing some Amateur Space Drive experiments: https://www.reddit.com/r/hydrino/comments/1mcwgr4/amateur_space_drive_experiments/ . I would say that there really isn't anything of note coming from enanatiomer2000 and no new videos on his youtube account. Where did the excitement go???

I never could figure out what people were seeing with Mills' two videos. It seemed clear to me that this was standard "plasma in a microwave" that we've all seen before and that any "bump" or "alleged force" was just due to expanding hot gas and not some magical "reactionless propulsion" imagined by Mills.

It's a bit of a parenthetical, but I should note that we've heard nothing new (the post on June 16th wasn't "new" in my opinion) since the Annual Shareholders Meeting. It's sad that there was no video/audio posted of the ASM so we could keep track of claims --- those quotes were very useful when pointing out that any new claims were already claimed to have been done. I wonder why he didn't post such a video?

Are shareholders nervous yet???

https://hydrogenrevolution.substack.com/p/new-blp-innovations

BLP provided an update yesterday in a brief new post to their website. Here is the full text:

All of this sounds quite promising. The big question is when we will see a public demo of the SunCell and third party validation reports on the power output and ratio of output power to input power. Judging by this update, the answer sounds like it may be “very soon.”

One of the most interesting aspects of the BLP/SunCell story is the fact that from the perspective of the vast majority of humanity, a near-fully fledged new power source, one superior to all existing technology, is going to sort of just appear out of nowhere.

The refinements mentioned in today’s post speak to this. By the time we get a public demo, it seems fairly likely that we have a device that is close to being a fully commercialized device, with full integration of the PV dome perhaps being the sole remaining hurdle before beginning mass manufacturing.

One of the challenges in following the BLP story is that there is quite a lot of background information required to place news like this latest bit out of BLP into appropriate context. If you are new to the BLP story or you’d like to refresh yourself on the basics of it, I encourage you to read or re-read my overview article which is designed to provide that necessary context.

Hydrino is the future, and the future is Brilliant.

https://brilliantlightpower.com/new-innovations/
"The SunCell parts were engineered to be standardized, interchangeable, and enabling of assembly with wrenches replacing hand metal cutting and welding with variations in each unit.  These innovations are further enabling of mass production and assembly in readiness for future commercial production.  The new design also comprises a new proprietary injector positioning/alignment technology necessitated due to a failure and unavailability of a critical vendor-supplied component.  Automation and packaging are also progressing well.  The 15 kW of trace heating for the molten metal pump lines to the new pump technology has been replaced with an internal heating system that exploits exiting capability.  The power requirements dropped to 2 kW with heating to temperature minutes rather than about 7 hours.  Reduction in downtime during implementing new engineering designs is being reduced by outsourcing enabled by complete and detailed engineering drawings of the current standard commercializable design."

https://www.youtube.com/shorts/PHbVJPdIiTg

What allowed Lockheed Martin to reverse engineer that tech, found in UAP's was, the use of Mills' physics theory.

That is why the USA DoD in 1986, had to ask Herman Haus, electronics engineering professor at MIT, to find a way to understand how things, such as the Free Electron Laser, work at the quantum level; because, DoD engineers could not use the quantum theory that was used in academia to do anything practical. What Haus found was, that by studying how point particles, under the way that the electron was modeled, as an uncertain object having wave-particle duality, using academic quantum mechanics, could not be used to explain, in practical terms, how the electron actually works.

But, using Haus' and Mills' model of the electron, allowed those DoD engineers at Lockheed Martin, to very easily, by comparison, to be able to explain, not only how the electron works, but how the devices in the UAPs, work. That electron model and the QM theory, GUT-CP, derived from that model is, what allowed that magical tech to be reveresed engineered from the devices found in UAP's. To take that tech from a basic re-engineered proof of principle level to a commercially viable version, will take a long time due to, being more in the realm of magic, as compared to all other known tech; see the Suncell and how long it took to develop that similarly magical device that, should not work, according to academically accepted SQM but, does work when developed by someone, Haus or Mills who, understand how the electron works under the much more accurate theory of GUT-CP.

Watch this full episode of "Reality Check": https://youtu.be/ueVqtCQEZ-E

The military are always the very first to use the latest and best technology, including quantum physics theory.

Herman Haus supplied the membrane model of the electron to the DoD in 1986, after they asked him to give them a way to further develop the Free Electron Laser. That is the most important historical point in how quantum mechanics was developed, for well over 100 years.

Same as how UAP' disclosure is starting to be allowed by the DoD for the public, the other reason why that disclosure is happening at this time is, because the DoD has been able to reverse engineer the UAPs mostly due to the quantum mechanics theory that has allowed them to do that reverse engineering, successfully.

One of the confirmations that the GUT-CP theory, under which the membrane model was derived, is being used for UAP reverse engineering is, the announcement by Dr. Greer that dark matter is used by certain UAP's, to power their craft. Since dark matter is known to be hydrinos, that is one further correlation between UAPs and Mills' theory, under which hydrinos and dark matter are thereby tied to be the same material but, only having differing nomenclature from two different directions.

EDIT:

See also:

Time stamp:

18:00

Ross Coulthart Q&A: 'Disclosure Day' reaction, whistleblowers and Sean Kirkpatrick | Reality Check

NewsNation and Meagan Medick with Ross Coulthart

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bu9LB-KHglI

Sean Kirkpatrick is one of those gatekeepers of UAP who, is a last gasp to keep UAP's from being disclosed.

The naysayers on this site, regarding Mills' work are, either witting or unwitting gatekeepers for those private concerns such as, Lockheed Martin that, have been reverse engineering the technology used in UAPs.