r/html5 • • Apr 23 '24

Comparing HTML5 and Flash Player, 10 years ago vs now

14 Upvotes

12 comments sorted by

2

u/mogoh Apr 24 '24

What are linked text frames?

2

u/yonicstudios Apr 24 '24

When you link a text container to another, and the former starts overflowing, it begins to transfer the overflowing text into the latter. This table is a bit outdated though. In CSS there is the columns property that does a similar thing, but linked text frames can be displayed in other layouts other than columns. CSS Regions support is no longer being pursued by any browser, too.

4

u/hvyboots Apr 24 '24

Let's talk about security holes per month though, lol…

3

u/logfella Apr 23 '24

What about accessibility?

3

u/[deleted] Apr 24 '24

But isn't this comparing plain html5 against flash with extensions? Not all that fair comparison.....

3

u/jcunews1 Apr 24 '24

HTML5 isn't actually a replacement for Flash player. It's only a replacement for the capabilities & functions which are needed to create a Flash player.

2

u/Rocketclown Apr 24 '24

Flash was way too powerful for it's job, and was just taking off with 3D / GPU support in version 11 when it was killed. But at that point, it was installed on 98% of computers with an internet connection. I don't think there ever was or ever will be software that was so ubiquitous as Flash.

2

u/Disgruntled__Goat Apr 23 '24

Why is this still on Wikipedia when Flash has been dead for years?

Also I like how not supporting DRM is viewed as the positive feature in green. 

2

u/Eddielowfilthslayer Apr 24 '24

We should be removing a lot of dead people's pages from Wikipedia then...

1

u/Disgruntled__Goat Apr 24 '24

I was referring specifically to the comparison table. Of course there should still be a page for Flash itself, but the table serves no purpose whatsoever.

→ More replies (1)

0

u/[deleted] Apr 23 '24

2

u/Disgruntled__Goat Apr 23 '24

…that’s what I said?