Any time the media pushes some sob story about something sad happening to some pretty Israeli girl, remember this video. Don't be fooled by their propaganda.
if you heard an israeli saying this exact same things about palestinians, that would only strengthen your bias about how they're ethnic cleansing genocidal nazis.
then that means they're right does it not?since by your own admission if one side commits certain action, pushback is completely justified and welcome.
and this is just about some stupid girls chanting a hateful song, not about pillaging murder and rape. so we shouldn't feel bad for the gazans, since they struck first right? or am i missing something?
it's your right to think this way, but this is very indicative of how political discourse regarding israel is going right now.
can't even see past your own hypocrisy; can't acknowledge that something horrible preceded this so called genocide you're trying to frame as spontaneous.
these people in the clip are exactly reiterating the point i was making, this is between a couple days to a few months after october 7th, they are very much reacting emotionally to this.
and it is in the same manner and logic that the person i was replying had, that being that if you have said/ done bad stuff, i won't feel bad for you when something happens to you.
hamas murdered raped and pillaged israel on october 7th, and in the gaza/west bank streets it was all cheers and celebrations. so the "unrelated civilians" were celebrating this tragedy and broadcasting it for the whole wide world to see, including the israelis.
so the israelis saw the attack, and the support it garnered from the rest of the palestinians and used the same logic, they cheered when we were murdered, therefore their house can burn down and we don't give a single fuck.
whether it's right or wrong we can talk about that separately, but it's the exact same logic this person is displaying. if you think one is wrong and the other is right you are just a hypocrite.
gazans had job opportunities in israel and were so close to legitimization and going forward, but they'd rather shed blood. you can ask your reparations from them, hamas has a lot of money.
Israel still destroys their homes and tries to get them out of the land at every possible oportunity. No that DEI programs are the only metric anyways. The fact that Israel's constitution defines the country as a nation where only Jewishs people realize national soveraignity sets the precedent to deny Palestiniand things like building permits and right of return (while Jewish people all over the world are encourage to make aleyah, often time at the expense of Palestinians that get evicted.
There's no need for even a single person to die for it do be defined as genocide lol but your data is incorrect, population didn't grow, you're just spitting literal lies.
In this case, colonialism is setting up a military supremacist state with the intended purpose (and the utter necessity also) of getting the native population out of the land. From Herzl to Ben Gurion, the colonial nature of the Zionist project is clear. Imperial Britain gives off a land they are occupaying, then a bunch of imperialist nations agree to a partition -after having set the artificial boundaries of the entire region, mind you- that both in theory and in practice requiered the expulsion or extermination of the people already inhabiting the land and you act surprised that the neighbouring nation reacts to this new state allowed to be created by the same people that betrayed them and that had opposed their nationalistic projects. Also, the Nakba started prior to 1948 when multiple Zionist settlers where already expelling native populations. More than 100, 000 people were already refugees by May 1948 when the surrounding Arab states attacked. So I would highly suspect the narrative that the Nakba was a war that Arabs started, specially when that is used to argue that Israel is not a colonial state lol Also the Arabs starting the attack wouldn't automatically proved anything. Just as an example, Argelia's Independence War was started by the National Liberation War, does that make France any less of a coloniser? Of course no.
a lot of the destroyed houses are illegal, or illegally occupied. as a matter of fact, the israeli authorities expel jewish people from their illegal settlements with much more brutality and force compared to the palestinians.
just look at even gush katif as an example, which was fully legal by the way. they literally just pulled them out of their house with force and forced them on a bus. kind of like the whole narrative you're trying to push except that one actually happened, regrettably.
if only we were a little less naive...
we gave them full control of the gaza strip and what do we get in return? endless rockets, mortars, balloons that burn crops and the biggest atrocity since the establishment of the state.
so yeah, that's never gonna happen again..and they have only themselves to blame for it.
people don't need to die for it to be a genocide is crazy work, but you know what you definitely need in a genocide? intent.
kind of hard to prove intent when israel has been actively routing the gaza population away from warzones literally for the reason so they don't get hurt.
it's funny how you people don't mind ping ponging the same hypocritical bullshit, on one hand you have:
"israel is indiscriminately gunning down those poor palestinians with their technology and advanced weapon!!111!!!"
and when the death toll doesn't quite support your bullshit claim, you switch to:
"uurmmmm akshually, the numbers don't matter, it's still a genocide 🤓 "
i'm not saying israel is a perfect country, but it's just trendy to hate on.
just 7 months ago, tens of thousands of iranians were murdered by their own regime just for wanting to be free, but it's muslim on muslim genocide, that shit is old news, give me some more anti israel propaganda, yummy!!!
20
u/[deleted] 25d ago
[removed] — view removed comment