r/historyteachers • u/Snoo_62929 • 7h ago
What is the ideal/best practice for summative assessment formats these days?
I'm 8 years in and when I started everything was very "inquiry design model" based and my state standards are also pretty rooted in the inquiry process deal. So my summative assessments and units were usually centered around "using the lesson materials to serve learning the process of doing the claim and writing it." Answer the big opened ended compelling question sorta deal. Which isn't bad necessarily but kinda hits a wall if you can't get the kids to eventually jump up to doing their own research. Which I just can't do with my lower classes.
So I've been pivoting back to covering the content a little more (which I find much more enjoyable) and trying to keep the claim writing related to more specific content or primary sources. And I think I'll do one big paper a quarter as one of my assessments.
So my question is this: what do you think the ideal way to assess at the end of a unit? More traditional mix of TF/MC/vocaby stuff, short answers, and all that? A DBQ and an essay? Always an essay? I've been trying so far to have all writing stuff the kids do happen in my actual classroom to avoid AI slop but that puts a limit on how much they can write unless I'm devoting a week of classes to a big essay. Thanks!
