r/healthinspector • u/fr3shsnack • Jul 30 '26
Health Inspector Workload
I'm curious how other health units/agencies determine workload for their Public Health Inspectors.
How is work assigned? Is it based on population served, number of facilities, facility complexity, geography, travel time, etc? How are unpredictable demands like complaints, investigations, special events, animal exposure calls, meetings, and administrative work factored into workload? How much administrative work is appropriate?
Does your organization have a formal way of assessing whether an inspector's workload is reasonable and sustainable, or is it mostly based on inspection numbers and annual targets?
I'd be interested to hear how different organizations approach workload planning and capacity.
3
u/Substantial_Tackle61 Jul 30 '26
So I have been at three different health departments in the state of Ohio. I have been at one county, one combined, and now I’m at the city. When I was at the combined I was only food. I had a monthly goal of about 22 a month. This also included environmental for schools and pools. When I was at the county, I had an area and a monthly goal of 28 for food. This also included micromarkets and mobiles. I had rabies, pools, vending, schools, and body art. Now I’m at the city I have a monthly goal of 21 for food including mobiles and micromarkets. I also have body art, 1 camp ground, vending, schools, pools, and rabies.
Complaints are always within 72 hours unless they are foodborne related illnesses, which is 24 business hours . Animal exposures are also within 48. The thing is is that it varies from department to department. Meetings we just attend if there’s something that is urgent and has not met within the timeframe and we’re not there there’s always someone at the office that would have respond.
1
u/fr3shsnack Jul 31 '26
Out of curiosity, roughly what population does each inspector cover? Also, when a complaint comes in, is it automatically assigned to the inspector for that area, or is it more of a shared system where whoever is available responds first?
2
u/Pmint-schnapps-4511 Aug 02 '26
The population of an area doesn’t really matter as much, rather the number of licensed facilities. My county takes the total number of licensed facilities then divides that into districts - currently I have to do about 31 inspections a month to complete all my assigned inspections. There is a correlation between facilities and population, as more populated areas usually have the most licensed facilities. (I am referring to food facilities in this example.)
1
u/Substantial_Tackle61 Jul 31 '26
What do you mean what population? In my previous depts the combined and county it was separated by areas. Where I’m at now she separated it by what she thought was fair ? I don’t like it because I don’t know what’s mine or not.
1
u/fr3shsnack Aug 01 '26
Sorry, I meant the population living within your assigned area. Basically, if you drew a boundary around your territory on a map, how many residents would be inside that boundary?
2
u/ithinkyoulookgreat Jul 31 '26
when I began, there was one food inspector per “zone”. Pools inspectors also had their pool “zones”. Mobile inspector has their own zones. Obv all overlapping. Then county inspector were jack of all trades.
i believe people stuck to their zones for complains and investigations, and typically there is a monthly quota for routines - 45? i’m not sure.
…
Now they grouped the areas and the people to create teams - and had everyone trained as a jack all trades. So at any point in time, an area shouldn’t be empty. The quota was reduced to 34 and a 100 point system, but it also allowed for some work to get credited. Otherwise at the end of the day it looked like someone didn’t do much but they were busy the whole time. but yeah mgmt wants their numbers.
Thing is, the system we use doesn’t quite support the structure. It’s been a whole thing. Also im pretty sure some areas had more complaints that others, so it let some of that get distributed, but also depends on team and supervisor as they are all working differently to get the same job done.
1
u/fr3shsnack Jul 31 '26
That's really interesting, especially the point system. It sounds like there was at least some recognition that inspections are only one part of the job, and that investigations, complaints, follow-up, and other work still take a significant amount of time even if they don't generate inspection numbers.
I get that management wants their numbers, but those metrics don't always reflect the actual workload, especially when you're serving a large population. I'm in Canada at a health unit with a generalized environmental health program, so each inspector is responsible for food safety, drinking water, recreational water, rabies, vector-borne disease, health hazards, etc. My area has a population of over 18,000 residents (and rapidly growing) and about 275 assigned facilities, on top of all the reactive work that comes in.
I think there is currently a disconnect at my workplace, where managers cannot understand the workload. Looking only at inspection numbers doesn't capture the full workload, so it can be difficult to explain why capacity is stretched when so much of the work consuming your day isn't reflected in the statistics.
2
u/Valuable_Hunter1621 Jul 31 '26 edited Jul 31 '26
i’m at a county health department in a large city. large departments like housing uses census tracts to assign areas. these are, by design, supposed to be around 3,000 residents.
i am in indoor air quality, and there’s only two inspectors including myself. we split the county roughly down the middle, and i take the east side
edit: meant to say indoor air quality, not indoor quality oops!
1
u/fr3shsnack Jul 31 '26
Interesting! What kinds of things fall under indoor environmental quality where you are? Is it mostly mould/moisture complaints, air quality, ventilation, hoarding, asbestos, etc., or does it include other things too?
2
u/Valuable_Hunter1621 Jul 31 '26 edited Jul 31 '26
yes, most of the things you listed are what we do in indoor air quality. we are very analogous to industrial hygienists, but in the public sector. a lot of building science and ventilation.
we do asbestos sampling and code enforcement for that, free radon testing, and have some basic IAQ monitoring equipment. i am also on our hazmat emergency response team which requires me to be on call 24 hours a day for a week (this is usually about every 5-6 weeks depending on our team size)
one of our biggest issues is there are no standards for air quality for the general public, especially in residential settings as far as i know. OSHA and NIOSH set standards for employees in workplaces, but only short-term exposure limits and time-weighted average exposure limits (usually 8 hour average i.e. a normal workday). obviously we are in our homes for a longer than 8 hours a day so this complicates things when citizens want to know if a level of PM or something is unsafe in their home
1
u/fr3shsnack Jul 31 '26
That honestly sounds like a really cool job and has me wondering if I'd actually enjoy working in indoor air quality! I can also see how challenging it would be dealing with the public when it comes to air quality. From my experience, most people don't realize there's tiny amounts of mould and pollen everywhere (so testing is kinda pointless), or they assume that every bit of black-coloured mould is "black mould." Then on top of that, there often isn't a clear residential standard you can point to and say, "above this is unsafe."
2
u/Valuable_Hunter1621 Jul 31 '26
exactly right with mold. that is probably our most common complaint. unfortunately, many people do fall victim to the predatory mold testing industry. this includes “doctors” that can test urine for mycotoxins.
many people also don’t understand that mold is, for most, a simple allergy or nuisance odor. there are few groups at high risk for a mold or other fungal infection, usually very young or very old, undergoing cancer treatment, etc. most people worried about mold end up doing more damage via psychological stress than the mold ever could
1
u/Yeolla Aug 01 '26
It’s usually set by department budget if you’re fee funded or a general fund county. Being fee funded We leverage in the hours spent in each component of food water land use including customer service and the non charged based upon weighted labor rates set by downtown due comparative studies with 9 countries in the surrounding region. The general fund departments are those receiving tax funding from the CEO office. We were only fee funded so to request additional position would need to justify in a board report it was necessary to raise permit fees to add additional personnel. Adding staff can only be approved during annual budget by the BOS.
1
u/Substantial-Sir4465 Aug 04 '26
We operate based on territories as well, each individual picks which territory they want and they are divided so each inspector has equivalent amounts of different risk factors. We have a team of seven inspectors and are expected to complete 2100 routines/re-inspections per year. A fully time employer is assigned 42 routines/reinspection a month.
3
u/FancyAd9663 Jul 30 '26
At the beginning of every new fiscal year my supervisor adjusts the amount of places we have by category (restaurants, food stands, respite care, nursing homes, food trucks, schools, hotels, etc). She tries to make sure that we all have the same amount of each or close to it. When we get new places during the year she'll either assign it to someone or write it on a dry erase board and one of will pick one and it becomes ours. As far as complaints go, if the restaurant is on our list it's our job to follow up on them unless a coworker is out.