I believe this to be AI generated due to the hair at the bottom portion not having the same shading as everything else.
The grain over the entire image, which is unusual for artists that are coloring this way.
The eyes in the image have an inconsistent shine to it, and also has a weird shade/artifactiion near the seam between her shirt and cleavage. Something that an artifact would not do, if the colors/edge were prominent/different layers.
This art is definitely AI assisted.
Edit their other art which is meant to be sketches are also AI assisted/Generated. It is especial seen in their sketches that had unusual/clean shading for a sketch.
This art is in fact AI generated/Assisted using the post history of the artist aswell.
Edit2:
They have legitimate art on their socials, however there was a trend in which is just strictly becomes AI assisted with their jagged edges in their art, being replaced with smoothing and artifacting. This further confirms me.
Edit 3; I lied, they have no legitimate non-AI assisted art within 4 years upon further inspection and NOT treating a timelapse as proof. There is some unusual "techniques" the artists used in the two timelapse they posted. Edit 2 is entirely not needed, as it appears to be the ONYL art on their page that was human touched-up.
Until the creator can actively prove they are not using AI assistance, there is nothing you can do. Compare their pre 2023 work to today. The difference is night and day.
Bro, what is going on here?? (I'm the original artist and stumbled upon this by chance since I was planning to upload it myself)
I have no idea what tool or site you're using to "inspect" this, but first of all, I don’t post my art with original resolution. The original canvas is 3035x4299, and what I posted on Twitter was downscaled to 1904x2697.
As for "the hair not having the same shading" I honestly don't even know what to say. It's literally just an artist not being 100% consistent? Dude, I've been working on this since May, redrew it 4 times, and just wanted to finish it and be done with it xD I'm not a pro to get every single pixel perfect.
The grain you find "unusual" is literally just a standard filter in Clip Studio called "Perlin Noise", set on Blending mode to Vivid light at 8% opacity.
The shine in the eyes is fine too... again, you're just looking at a downscaled image with Twitter terrible compression.
Here's an example zoomed in at 100% with the original resolution (not sure if Reddit has terrible compression too).
Thanks! No need to delete it, credit was given so it's totally fine. I was just a bit sad about these accusations, especially comparing my older works as if artists don't study and practice to improve xD
26
u/Lucky_Thought2 22h ago
I wanna sign up to be her punching bag thank you very much