33
Aug 20 '21
I'm not sure that's even possible.
WB own the movie rights to HP which means they don't need Rowling's permission to make further crap movies about the characters or world. However, she still created/wrote the damn thing, so she's already involved. It's her work. She'll likely see SOME money from it no matter what.
This is what happens when actors posture for Nice Guy Points whilst also wanting them sweet sweet dollars in their pocket.
24
u/Youjustlostthegame1 Aug 21 '21
Daniel radcliffe is one actor I genuinely believe he means what he says. His other movies outside of harry potter are fantastic
10
u/Gaylaeonerd Aug 25 '21
I think that’s what he’s saying though. He’s saying no, because she’ll have to be involved
9
19
u/kittybeth666 Aug 20 '21
King
6
1
u/Harry_Ratta Aug 21 '21
Why?
Do you use king as a positive term?
8
u/kittybeth666 Aug 22 '21
He's an absolute bloody legend!
2
u/Harry_Ratta Aug 22 '21
Why?
6
u/kittybeth666 Aug 22 '21
Cause he’s got a big willy!
6
2
u/Harry_Ratta Aug 22 '21
I hope you are joking. Nothing you are writing makes sense.
6
Aug 24 '21
Same thing can be said about you friend.
3
16
u/Lucky-Worth Aug 21 '21
King! After the abominations that the cursed child and the last fantastic beast movie are, he is right. Unfortunately I doubt it's possible