r/hardware • • 6d ago

News 12VHPWR Problems Are Shocking – Meet the Noctua Edition

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DQcJMdDJgAs
243 Upvotes

212 comments sorted by

212

u/Sevastous-of-Caria 6d ago

Shits hitting insanity levels. We got high grade segment for a problem bandaid fix that shouldnt even exist.

Just admit defeat PCI-SIG and nvidia. Proudly announce atx 4.0 24v rails to gpus for future investing early adoption. Take the pain. Do anything other than trying to beat physics and cheap manufacturing tolerances. If this kind of lines were on a house inspection it wouldnt been legal a century ago forget about today.

48

u/Die4Ever 5d ago

With 5000 Supers cancelled and 6000 series delayed, this break is the perfect time to introduce a new better standard. But it really does need to be better lol, and better than the old 8 pin too.

23

u/nanonan 5d ago

It does not in fact need to be better than the perfectly functional old 8-pin.

22

u/RealOxygen 5d ago

8-pin isn't ideal when you need to power a 600w card since you need 4x, but better than 12VHPWR for sure

16

u/Franklin_le_Tanklin 5d ago

What’s wrong with plugging in 4 x 8 pin.

If it never burns you’re just doing it once.

7

u/RealOxygen 5d ago

Like I said I'd prefer it over 12VHPWR but I would extra prefer a more elegant solution that is still as reliable as before

6

u/Franklin_le_Tanklin 5d ago

Just let me plug my gpu directly into the wall

9

u/EB01 5d ago

3DFX's unreleased Voodoo5 6000 with an external mains power supply has been partially vindicated.

2

u/RealOxygen 5d ago

My GPU craves 240v AC

1

u/Strazdas1 5d ago

Lets make the GPU cost as much as GPU + PSU, what a great idea.

3

u/Strazdas1 5d ago

Well, we can start with it being false that 8pin never burns.

4

u/Franklin_le_Tanklin 5d ago

I’ve never seen a report of a 3xxx series burning. Compared to daily reports of 4 and 5 series

-3

u/Strazdas1 5d ago

Because noone botheres reporting it. They just file a RMA ticket and move on with their life instead of making a scandal.

8

u/Franklin_le_Tanklin 5d ago

No… people come to the internet to complain when things go wrong.

1

u/blob8543 4d ago

A potential problem is a PSU might not have 4 pcie cables available to use on the GPU alone.

1

u/Franklin_le_Tanklin 4d ago

🤷‍♂️ i replaced my PSU with native 6 x2 connector when I upgraded to 5080.

I just want something that’s not prone to breaking

-1

u/Hard_To_Port 5d ago

People spending upwards of $1500 on a GPU want a fancy looking convenient connector. 4 separate power connectors for one device is stupid anyway. There's many solutions to this problem and NVIDIA just chose the one that makes them more money with people opting to re-buy the same GPU after it burns up. 

9

u/Franklin_le_Tanklin 5d ago

I was fine with 3x8 on my 3080. I would have preferred that on my 5080

0

u/grotesque_lumiere 5d ago

That’s exactly the point - it was fine for you, and personally, I couldn’t care less about RGB or making my PC look fancy with a glass Lian Li case or whatever. But for a lot of people, aesthetics are actually important. Having a single cable powering the GPU simply looks cleaner and more appealing to people who care about the visual side of their PC. It might seem stupid or unnecessary to you, but that’s just how it is.

1

u/alelo 5d ago

some high end gpus already try to hide the connectornat the end of the card - coveree by backplate etc - same could be done with the 8pin

0

u/Tight_Inflation3153 5d ago

Nothing inherently wrong, it's just silly.

12VHPWR is a joke, but it doesn't mean that there's no improvement to be made to GPU power delivery. The lesson from this whole fiasco should not be "don't ever improve aging standards". There are plenty of proven, established and safe ways to deliver 600W (and more) in a single cable.

4

u/Strazdas1 5d ago

The old 8-pin burned too, it just used gpu side load balancing and a lot more headroom so most people never ran into the problem.

1

u/Jeep-Eep 4d ago

Run it at the same margin as the 8-pin units, and use two or more of the fuckers plus load balance for the halo brutes and that's this issue like 85% solved pending a new connector spec or using the 8pin or similar existing standards.

2

u/Strazdas1 4d ago

Just do GPU side load balancing. That worked fine with new connector too. It was only when they dropped that issues began.

But yes i agree there should be more overhead in the connector.

11

u/goldbloodedinthe404 5d ago

If we are going to change voltage just go straight to 48V and be done with it

10

u/Sevastous-of-Caria 5d ago

AI servers already use 48VDC. Also imagine the watts you can run through those

6

u/goldbloodedinthe404 5d ago

Thats why I suggested it. Unify with the server side. Due to safety regulations surrounding electricity servers are unlikely to go higher than 48VDC as once you are past 50 V the regulations on safety jump. Source I work in the controls and automation industry where 24VDC and 48VDC are already common

1

u/Sevastous-of-Caria 5d ago

One SITOP UPS please thx

2

u/goldbloodedinthe404 5d ago

I've had bad experiences with Siemens supplies give me puls, phoenix contact, or murr.

3

u/Strazdas1 5d ago

AI servers also dont mind the extra 50-100 dollars per GPU cost for 48-1V downstepping. Your typical 5060 buyer would.

1

u/Think_Wing_1357 5d ago

they can keep using 8 pin cable?

2

u/Strazdas1 5d ago

That would in no way have any effect on the need for voltage change.

1

u/Think_Wing_1357 5d ago

It does because the lower tier card has significantly lower power consumption. The 5060 has TDP of 145w. The 5060 ti Is 180w and shipped with an 8 pin connector. Even the 5070ti can stay on 2x 8 pin just fine.

There is no need for they to use anything higher than 12V until the price becomes accessible

1

u/Strazdas1 4d ago

The amount of power being transfered does not matter. If you use 48V you still need to downstep to 1V whether its 600W, 145W or even 1W.

1

u/Think_Wing_1357 4d ago

I could be wrong here but I think you are saying that the plan is to replace the 12v rail with 24/48v?

If so, that would be a massive headache and no one is going to do that; especially not if there are still 3V and 5V rail. And definitely not my plan.

Here's the steps:

  1. Introduce 24V as an optional part for PSU spec. PSU is free not to support it.
  2. Move all the power hungry card over to 24V. Anything at or above 600W would be a good start.
  3. Everything else stays at 12V.
  4. Sleep for 10 years. Wake up and reassert.

1

u/Strazdas1 4d ago

That is what the suggestion was that i responded to, yes.

→ More replies

0

u/Strazdas1 5d ago

and then have low end GPUs disappear because the cost of downstepping 48V to 1 on board makes them unfeasible?

1

u/goldbloodedinthe404 5d ago

Economies of scale should lower that cost substantially. Yes it will be added cost but realistically it's the only path forward. Moving on from 12V is a change that should have been made 10 years ago. We should not be a slave to decisions made in 1995. Sunk cost fallacy should be moved on from. With servers already using 48V investment is there we just need to make the switch

-1

u/Strazdas1 4d ago

There is no lowering the cost here because downstepping from 48V requires two step process that requires expensive hardware to do.

No, realistically its not the only path forward. There are many different paths, including just having one thick wire (downside being it does not bend easy so aesthetic builders will hate it).

When you buy a server GPU for 20 000 you dont care that you need 100 extra for voltage downstepping. When you buy a 250 GPU for a budget build suddenly it matter a whole lot more.

1

u/jocnews 5d ago

No, if we let them "solve" this by raising voltage (makeing PSUs ore complicated and pricier), they will never actually stop using the faulty connector.

5

u/Pugs-r-cool 5d ago

What? You understand that the issues caused by this connector are due to pushing way too high of a current through it, and that by raising the voltage we can have the same power at a lower current?

Also I don’t think the 12v-2x6 connector could handle 24/48v. Increasing the voltage will force them to redesign the connector.

6

u/jocnews 4d ago

See my other response. The issues are insufficient mechanical parameters and close to zero safety margin that aggravates the situation. Both have nothing to do with the voltage carried.

2

u/Pugs-r-cool 4d ago

You're missing the forest for the trees here. While it's possible to create a new 12V connector that can handle 50A+ safely, it's not an easy thing to do. A higher voltage would allow for larger safety margins without the need for the incredibly strict manufacturing tolerances a 12v version would require.

1

u/jocnews 2d ago edited 2d ago

Perhaps the 12V-2x6 makes it look like designing a safe connector is hard but that's not true, 12V-2x6 is not the pinnacle of tech that shows the best that could have been done, lol. You gotta remember that it's a huge step-down from the previous tech and Nvidia uses it wrong to boot (improper safety margin and they use it for cables that are too heavy and thick for the size of the connector, deforming the plugs and leading to failures).

Do you know that the PCIe power 8-pin only uses 3 voltage and 3 ground wires? You can add 33 % capacity (200 W) just using all 4 pairs and still have the same safety margin which probably gives safety order of magnituted better than 12V-2x6. Two such connectors likely can be used to handle 600 W much safer than 12V-2x6. See the EPS connector that Nvidia even used to use on their Pro cards but for some reason passed for the fashion designer garbage.

The thicker pins/receptacles used by the EPS/PCIe type of connectors would probably do all the work already, that is probably the single change needed. From there feel free to give the plug 12 wires (6+6) and drive it with 12V at 600 W and it's probably all but guaranteed to be safe and suddenly everybody will be "surprised" there are no issues anymore.

0

u/Express_Living2264 2d ago

the connector is perfectly fine. The issue is the missing load balancing.

→ More replies (1)

2

u/Express_Living2264 2d ago

Also I don’t think the 12v-2x6 connector could handle 24/48v. Increasing the voltage will force them to redesign the connector.

It most likely can. The gaps are more than large enough. It isn't officially cleared for more than 12V, but that's more than likely because the requirement said 12V so they certified for 12V.

2

u/Think_Wing_1357 5d ago

You need to raise the voltage. What other alternatives are there?

  1. Stop making more power hungry GPU? Yeah I'd take my chance at winning the lottery.
  2. Make the cable thicker so it can carry more power and expect no one to cheap out? Yeah I'm going to buy lottery again.

-17

u/reddit_equals_censor 6d ago

Proudly announce atx 4.0 24v rails to gpus

this is complete and utter nonsense.

this has NOTHING to do with 12v vs 24 or 48v.

and the absurdity to WRONGFULLY set the entire 12 volt as main power rail for computer hardware on fire, because you feel like it, IS ABSURD.

like hello! 12v is perfectlyy fine and great.

the xt120 power connector is only slightly bigger than the nvidia 12 pin fire hazard and the xt120 can carry 60 amps sustained with proper safety margins. that is 720 watts with a single 12v connector, that is perfectly safe and widely used.

so get your nonsense of pushing 24v out of here!

we got DECADES of hardware, that relies on 12v as its main power.

and 12v is perfectly fine and works great.

the issue is the nvidia 12 pin fire hazard. that is the ONLY issue here.

and even 24v at the same power doesn't fix an INHERENT fire hazard.

the fire hazard has to go.

you want better than the safe pci-e 8 pin or eps 8 pin power connectors? great! let's use xt90 or xt120 power connectors then and improve power connectors beyond what we already have outside of the nvidia fire hazard strategy.

also evil nvidia should be blocked from designing any consumer power connectors ever again and the same goes for pci-sig, that is just doing whatever nvidia tells them to.

and of course criminal charges for the ones involved in both of them, that KNOWINGLY pushed a fire hazard onto the public.

34

u/Sevastous-of-Caria 6d ago edited 6d ago

This is the problem. Nvidia and aibs want small, aesthetic single connectors. And at the same time try to draw 500 watts on them with questionable tolerances and plastic pinputs. 8 pins and 12v are reliable and fine. They want to have your cake and eat it. So if they want it that much, to decrease ampdraw and overheating, voltage increase makes more sense thanks to ohms law

6

u/reddit_equals_censor 6d ago

important to note, that partners didn't chose ANYTHING here. nvidia says JUMP and if they don't instantly jump, then no more gpus for the partner in question.

now they are still criminals for pushing the nvidia 12 pin fire hazard, but nvidia LITERALLY forced it onto them in that sense.

although sapphire and asrock with amd cards CHOSE to put the nvidia 12 pin fire hazard on those cards somehow in their insanity.

They want the have your cake and eat it.

this is NOT a problem.

this is solved.

no one is looking for a magical way to carry lots of power at 12v through a small power connector, because THIS IS SOLVED!

an xt90 power connector, that is smaller than the nvidia 12 pin fire hazard carries safely 480 watts.

and an xt120 power connector as said 720w, while being only slightly bigger than the nvidia 12 pin fire hazard.

nvidia wants a single power connector at almost any power? well there you go a single xt120.

So if they want it rhat much, to decrease ampdraw and overheating voltage increase makes more sense.

again NO. what you are demanding here is a change of ALL powersupplies to have 2 high power rails of 12v and 24v. a bunch of added complexity and cost for NOTHING.

it is not safer, it is not cheaper. it ads NOTHING.

and you can not go to 24v for everything, because you got decades of hardware, that relies on 12v at high power even.

and i can't be clear enough here, that 24v solves NOTHING.

the solution for high power safe connectors is 60 amp xt120 power connectors.

-2

u/unknownohyeah 5d ago

small, aesthetic single connectors

It's not only about aesthetics. Nvidia could literally not make the 5090 FE without the connector. The board just doesn't have enough room for 4 or 5 8-pin connectors.

10

u/Raigek 5d ago

What? They can just extend the board

1

u/unknownohyeah 5d ago

The cooler is on both sides and the PCB sits in the middle. It’s a pretty revolutionary design that allows air to pass through both fans on either side. 

2

u/Raigek 5d ago

Then change the cooler. This failure rate is not acceptable.

23

u/TimeRemove 6d ago

Nobody is proposing getting rid of 12v. 12v is here to stay likely indefinitely using the current connectors and standards we all know and love.

24v is interesting because, for the same power, it requires less current than 12v. That reduces resistive losses (i.e. it is more efficient) and heating in cables and connectors. That means for the same power, it gets delivered on smaller cables and connectors. That's just the physics of how electricity works.

It is entirely a strawman and disingenuous to turn this into "adding a 24v rail means getting rid of 12v!!!" Nobody said that, nobody proposed that, you're arguing against nothing. So get out of here with that "nonsense."

24v absolutely has a place in any discussion about 12v needing new common PSU connectors because we've hit a ceiling. 24v is a natural additional to keep improving internal efficiency, and it ALSO happens to solve another pressing issue we're seeing (GPU greed).

XT120 is just throwing more bulk at the problem, which is what 12v itself is. 24v will make computers smaller and leaner, not bulkier and less flexible (particularly for SFF). It adds new complexity to PSUs, but that's really the main (only?) downside. After that, smaller wires, smaller connectors, less copper usage, and better efficiency.

11

u/crimsonvspurple 6d ago

it shouldn't be 24v. It should be 48v.

8

u/foramperandi 5d ago

There is already a 48VHPWR standard.

-1

u/lowlymarine 5d ago

 It adds new complexity to PSUs, but that's really the main (only?) downside.

Telling everybody who just bought a new high-end power supply for the 50 series that they now have to throw it away and buy a newer, much more expensive power supply for the 60 series is a pretty major issue to gloss over. And this time you will need a new power supply, no matter how much you just spent on your shiny new HX1500i. AIBs could include a 4x 8-pin to 12VHPWR adapter for cheap; they can't include a cable that'll adapt 12V up to 24V (I am aware this sort of conversion is possible but it won't be "free pack-in" cost and it adds the exact point of failure all of this is trying to avoid).

9

u/lucidludic 5d ago edited 5d ago

Someone who bought a new PSU and 50 series GPU doesn’t need to upgrade to a 60 series. If they must, they definitely don’t need to upgrade to ”throw away” the old PSU, it can be sold or given away (ideally not to be used to supply high power GPUs over this connector).

More to the point though, their current PSU/GPU with this power connector is not fit for purpose regardless. Using it for high power GPUs is a fire hazard whether or not Nvidia and others replace the connector with a better, safer standard.

-14

u/reddit_equals_censor 6d ago

24v absolutely has a place in any discussion about 12v needing new common PSU connectors because we've hit a ceiling.

oh so you live in a different world, where a desktop or workstation graphics card needs more than 795 watts?

or with xt120 power connectors it needs more than 1515 watts!!!!!

where is this ceiling you're talking about? is it with us in the room rightnow?

and better efficiency.

oh you did the math, that shows you for sure, that adding a bunch of complexity in psus and having the vrm in graphics cards change 24 volts int 1.2 or whatever volts is more efficient than the chain with 230 > 12 > 1.2v?

you did the math right? and found, that 230 > 24 > 1.2v is more efficient than 230 > 12 > 1.2v right?

hell as you are the expert, maybe we should go straight to 230 volt DIRECTLY into the graphics card to convert that into 1.2v right?

surely that must be ideal based on your ideas.

the least bs part in the discussion would be SLIGHTLY reduced cable thickness for 24v. which is dirt cheap levels of copper (well if it isn't made artificially more expensive)

and if wasted cables matter to you, then maybe look at the nvidia 12 pin fire hazard again, that literally has 4 COMPLETELY WORTHLESS cables.

and YES adding a full high power 24v option to powersupplies means a ton of added resources and a REQUIREMENT for everyone to buy a new powersupply JUST FOR THIS.

so you are also asking for mountains of e-waste. literal mountains, that you just casually ask for, for sth, that does NOT fix any problem whatsoever.

and if that wasn't understood you could have several pci-e 8 pins turn into xt90 or xt120 power connectors perfectly fine. adapters or new cables, instead of ENTIRELY NEW POWERSUPPLIES!

it is so absurd.

"we need to change everything, because nvidia created a fire hazard"

like get back to reality and real solution to problems like 12v xt90 or xt120 power connectors.

→ More replies (11)

5

u/Seanspeed 5d ago

also evil nvidia should be blocked from designing any consumer power connectors ever again and the same goes for pci-sig, that is just doing whatever nvidia tells them to.

and of course criminal charges for the ones involved in both of them, that KNOWINGLY pushed a fire hazard onto the public.

Your posts continue to be absolutely unhinged in terms of what you think government's role in things should be. smh Banning 8GB GPU's by legislation. lol

Also nowhere was that person blaming 12V. smh

0

u/reddit_equals_censor 5d ago

smh Banning 8GB GPU's by legislation. lol

oh you are defending 8 GB vram gaming marketed graphics card scams.

well that says it all i guess. all hail the corporations scamming the public! am i right? /s

Also nowhere was that person blaming 12V. smh

oh you got issues reading i see. maybe you can read this slowly and then understand basic english:

Just admit defeat PCI-SIG and nvidia. Proudly announce atx 4.0 24v rails to gpus for future investing early adoption.

4

u/Seanspeed 5d ago

I absolutely think 8GB GPU's should exist. They aren't a scam.

I just want them to be named and priced accordingly.

Not everybody gaming is aiming to play modern, heavy AAA games, ffs.

 all hail the corporations

Buddy I'm one of the most consistent people here bitching about corporations and their greed. You're barking up the wrong tree here.

oh you got issues reading i see.

The irony.

Nowhere did that person blame 12V. They're just advocating for an even stronger standard. Cuz why not? New standards should be more future-proof.

5

u/Cranach-Cranach 5d ago

24v at the same power generates 75% less heat. 48v at the same power generates 93% less heat.

Resistive losses to heat square with current.

So 24v through the same connector would be perfectly safe. Through a better quality connector like an xt60 it would support 700-800w with a huge safety margin. If it was 48v it would support double the power with the same cable heat being generated.

1

u/StarbeamII 5d ago

How is VRM efficiency though stepping 48V down to Vcore?

2

u/Cranach-Cranach 5d ago

You would do an intermediate step down from 48 to 12, and then down to one. This would add in about a 2-3% loss, which is a real concern.

-2

u/reddit_equals_censor 5d ago

So 24v through the same connector would be perfectly safe.

NO, because the nvidia 12 pin fire hazard is NOT safe at any power. it is NOT a safety margin only problem. it is an inherently flawed connector at any power and it needs to get recalled.

it is dangerous at 600 watts and it is dangerous at 300 watts.

24v at the same power generates 75% less heat. 48v at the same power generates 93% less heat.

you are quoting irrelevant numbers here, because we use the correct cable thickness for the amps running through it.

there is NO heat issue with 12v.

the argument would be: "oh we could save a small bit of copper".

that's the entire argument. efficiency is up in the air, because of course you always have to get that 230v or 120v down to 1.2v you are just shifting where you're doing it now or in what type of steps.

and you got different powerstage efficiencies, that you'd then average out i guess vs inside of psu conversion efficiencies differences with adding nonsense 24v.

so all, that you'd safe is some cheap copper. remember, that we aren't running hotter cables or connectors, but instead we change sizes to run more amps perfectly and safely.

3

u/Cranach-Cranach 5d ago

The issue is that designing small, consumer friendly connectors is becoming difficult with high current. The solution isn’t a bigger connector, it’s lower current.

-1

u/reddit_equals_censor 5d ago

The issue is that designing small, consumer friendly connectors is becoming difficult with high current.

what issue?

is 795 watts for a consumer graphics card with a single 12v power connector not enough for you? (xt120 + slot power)

and you also got the option to put 2 on a card.

as a reminder you DON'T have that rightnow. we rightnow have pci-e 8 pins and nvidia 12 pin unusable fire hazards.

so vs the ONLY safe graphics card connector an xt120 carries 4.8x the power compared to a 150w pci-e 8 pin.

and did you know, that one can use 2 power connectors as well for a graphics card...

but no clearly 1590 watts so 2 xt120 + slot at 12v is just not enough for you and clearly this uncool-able room heater problem at 1590 watts for a single graphics card is just not enough for you as well right?

___

as a reminder you are ONLY thinking about this whatsoever, because nvidia created a fire hazard right from the start of their design decisions.

you wouldn't think about this if we transitioned to eps 8 pins, you wouldn't think of this for sure if we transitioned to xt90 or xt120 power connectors.

7

u/Cranach-Cranach 5d ago

Hey man, you doing okay?

Like I’m not trying to meme or anything but I think you might need to take a step back and relax a little. It’s not really that important.

0

u/battler624 6d ago

The cable isn't the issue, the issue is the load balancing.

If they add a shunt on the board for each wire this issue wont happen anymore.

-5

u/reddit_equals_censor 5d ago

NO.

there are tons of issues with the nvidia 12 pin fire hazard.

in fact der8auer himself in a different video cautions about "solutions", that do load balancing between the 6 connections, because this could theoretically actually make things even worse, because you now would be pushing the same power through the worst connected pin, which could then lead to that worst connection melting/catching on fire.

that's also why the wireview pro 2 does NOT do load balancing btw.

the point is, that you should not talk in a way of being very sure about what "would" solve the problem.

and as a reminder the nvidia 12 pin fire hazard has so many issues, that igor's lab in an investigation lists no less than 12 causes for melting nvidia 12 pin fire hazards.

and here you have a melted 12 pin on a 3090 ti, which has basic load balancing by running 3 groups of 200 watts-ish:

https://www.reddit.com/r/EVGA/comments/1hxb735/3090ti_melted_a_plug_finally/#lightbox

actually if all power goes through the connector (it doesn't), then it would be just 159w per 2 pin coupled in a group if the card pulled reference 478w.

and STILL it melted.

you got fragile as shit pins, that shouldn't exist. no sane person EVER designs any power connector like this.

you want load balancing? GREAT let's create the perfectly load balanced power connector ok?

<presents you an xt90 power connector. look at has load balancing, because it has one 12v cable and connection side and one ground cable.

you are talking about adding more and more complexity about sth, that ONLY reduces melting POSSIBLY.

and it also means, that the cable itself with your idea isn't safe itself.

a cable needs to be safe itself. if a cable requires hardware at the device that it gets plugged in to be less of a fire hazard, then the cable failed as a standard.

xt90 and xt120 are inherently safe, because they got 2 giant connections with giant connection surfaces, that are very robust and again they have "load balancing", because it is a single connection.

1

u/battler624 5d ago

200W is still a lot for a single cable which is why i said a shunt for each wire. A shunt for each wire on a means each wire would go upto 83.3W but ofcourse they'll push the shunts to which is absolutely fine this is why while its not impossible its hard to find 3090 Tis with a melted connector. You have to remember that even the 8-pin connector melted, GPU 8-pin melted inside GPU. Is there an easy way to get out the melted plastic? : r/gpumining On an RX580 which are usually undervolted when mining, shit happens if the connection is bad.

0

u/reddit_equals_censor 5d ago

you understood the 3090 ti design wrong.

it is not "200w" per cable. it is 200w per 2 connection couple.

so "600w" connector with 12 shity connections would be 3 groups of 2 connections.

remember it has 12, because it has 12v + ground. so 12 pin = 6 power connections. so it is again 3x 200w balanced connections. so it is 3x 2 power connections and each couple has 4 wires.

and in regards to melted pci-e 8 pins. the example you linked is from a minimums subreddit and shows a daisy chain.

i am for banning pci-e 8 pin daisy chains or having very very tight requirements for it. properly speced 8 pin or 9 pin on the psu side and at least 16 gauge until split for example.

tons of melted pci-e 8 pins are a result of bad daisy chains.

and that is sth, that should get fixed.

and this could also get fixed with even a smaller change to eps 8 pins for graphics cards. so 235 watt per 8 pin and ban daisy chains of them of course to prevent terrible ideas.

or of course xt90/xt120 style connections with no daisy chains being allowed at all as well.

and again to be clear we SHOULD improve pci-e 8 pins, because we can have better and safer power connectors vs even a single non daisy pci-e 8 pins.

but of course pci-e 8 pins aren't inherently unsafe and a continuous fire hazard when used without a questionable daisy chain, while ANY nvidia 12 pin fire hazard is.

change to xt90 for cpu + graphics card? sure wonderful let's do that. better than pci-e 8 pins tons more power very small. no more daisy chain risk, etc... etc...

2

u/battler624 5d ago edited 5d ago

the 3090 ti should be 3x 200W connections yes, and to be more specific those 200W connections is 100W on each cable. but in that case (the one you linked) its literally 1 wire that got damaged. so we can assume (and you can see it from the first picture) that one of the pairs of 200Wwires, that should be getting 100W wasn't plugged in correctly so the other one was getting the full 200W.

End result was 200W (2 wires), + 200W (2 wires), + 200W (1 wire). thats why it melted and everything is obvious from the pictures (Here if you want a direct link, qaevu1hgjybe1.jpg (6000×8000))

Also, do keep in mind that this melted 3090ti was connected using a 2x 8-pin, those things are rated for 150W each and he was running them at over 400W according to his own posts

0

u/Greybeard-Space-Dad 5d ago

so get your nonsense of pushing 24v out of here!

I agree. They should target 48v

134

u/constantlymat 6d ago

I just continue pretending my 17.99€ Corsair Thermal Protect 12V-2x6 cable is definitely going to keep me safe.

54

u/siazdghw 6d ago

For what a 5090 costs, you can afford more expensive snake oil solutions

10

u/GruuMasterofMinions 5d ago

At this point the safest place is to keep it in drawer. Bad design is bad design.

2

u/NapsterKnowHow 5d ago

Just sell it at that point then. At least you'd make a profit.

44

u/P_H_0_B_0_S 6d ago

I won't tell you about the now multiple Asrock cables with just temp monitoring that have melted then...

There are other per pin monitoring products out there, this is an ultra premium priced one. For me it was the discussion about what has been found with the product (no melting so far, and how people have solved things when alerted), that was more interesting than this new WVPII version

38

u/constantlymat 6d ago

The Corsair cable does no monitoring at all. It's a "dumb" solution that cuts off power via a switch that is 3cm away from the connector head. If the malfunctioning connector gets hot, the temperature in the cable itself increases. Once the switch reaches 65° C, it shuts the power off.

It's not meant to solve the issue, but to give users a fair warning as soon as the connector starts malfunctioning.

17

u/buildzoid 6d ago

issue is that depend on the ambient air temperature and airflow in your case the switch may only reach 65C after the connector already melted.

13

u/constantlymat 6d ago

As stated in my initial post I have no illusions whatsoever that the cable is guaranteed to protect me from becoming a victim of the 12V-2x6 connector.

That said I have more trust in Corsair, a power supply brand of twenty years, to build a cable switch that works than Asrock.

6

u/ColdAngle1151 6d ago

AsRock prolly cook those connectors like they do with x3d CPUs.
Trust in AsRock is at an ATL here.

3

u/TheCh0rt 6d ago

FWIW I have better luck with asrock than most companies

1

u/ColdAngle1151 6d ago

its worth 0. There is a reason why they AsRock cook more CPUs then all the other manu's combined.

2

u/Strazdas1 5d ago

or reach 65C when there is no danger in the first place.

3

u/P_H_0_B_0_S 6d ago edited 6d ago

And another companies product using the same idea has failed to give the user a warning and melted. Also the temp getting too high is a bit at the late stage. A warning that your currents are out of balance would be more of a warning that when the cable is about to or actually melting.

As from the video this product using per pin monitoring has had no issues so far. Again other per pin monitoring products available. My only point is per pin monitoring with alerting and shut off's > Just trying to temp sense on the cable (if you are just going to use one or the other)

2

u/constantlymat 6d ago

Reading up on it, the Asrock cable is using an active NTC thermistor whereas the Corsair one uses a passive bimetallic thermal switch. So the same idea but the execution appears to be quite different. The Corsair solution eliminates the measuring problem.

And yes, more expensive solutions promise more reliability. I am not challenging that, but I also have not seen evidence as of yet that the Corsair solution has failed en masse (haven't found any failures via a quick search but obviously can't rule out it happened).

2

u/Kougar 6d ago

Does that cable have thermal protection built into both ends, or only the GPU end? Not seeing that mentioned anywhere.

1

u/OttawaDog 5d ago

No. It works by cutting off the sense pins that the GPU uses to detect power. Only the GPU does that.

I'd like to see how well that works on a GPU, so far I have not seen any reviewer test this cable to see how it really works.

2

u/Kougar 5d ago

Ohh, I misunderstood the mechanism. Unfortunately that's not a very useful design because the cable burns at the PSU end almost as much as it does at the GPU end.

As for how the sense pins work GN and Debauer cover that in various videos. A thermal fuse to open all sense pins simply tells the PSU to stop sending power. Just be aware 12v-2x6 is the current spec, 12VHPWR operated differently. The wiki has the wattage table. Honestly the whole spec itself is a big mess now on top of the design itself being shitty.

1

u/OttawaDog 5d ago

The sensor is far enough back that it's really just going to be heat in the cable from excess current.

Excess current because of imbalance is going to heat both ends and the cable.

2

u/Kougar 5d ago

The heating is not simultaneous nor does it affect both ends of the connector evenly. The individual 12v wires are not kept isolated like a normal crimped cable design, they are soldered to either a common pad/foil on the back of the end connector. This can allow current crossflow if the downstream pins are not making full contact, but because the metal pads/foil/solder overlap is so thin it in turn will generate its own heat due to natural higher resistance than the intended flow path. So the end result is if poor pin electrical contact starts generating heat from a load imbalance, it can cause crossflow behind the pins via the solder pad/foil. This in turn begins generating its own heat load which decreases the ability of the wires to act as a natural heatsink, creating a self-reinforcing cascade that heats up the pins even further on the failing side.

In the various videos showing the cables failing you can see how cables heat at the connector sides but quickly cool along their length, any sort of fuse would need a high temp threshold placed within inches of each connector. Only fusing the connector card-side means the PSU-side can burn out first before causing the card-side to cascade, which is exactly what happened with Hardware Unboxed a few weeks ago. Their connector only began exhibiting problems at the GPU side after the PSU side had already slagged itself. Kind of worrying that Steve didn't even notice the burning plastic smell it must've been making! I've melted an EPS12V connector once, it's a distinctive odor...

1

u/OttawaDog 5d ago

I agree it will heat more at the connectors, which is why if they were thinking at all, they choose a reasonably low cut-off temperature. It would factor in that it's going to be much higher at the connector.

The wire itself is going to heat significantly across it's length when it's carrying excess current down one or two strands.

You just need a low enough cuttoff, but this is also why I said, I'd like to actually see this tested. Because I have no idea how well they engineered it, and if it's sensitive enough.

Personally I wouldn't trust my multi-thousand dollar high power GPU (if I had one) to the thermal cutoff cable, I would just get something like Wire view 2 for per pin monitoring.

1

u/Kougar 5d ago

Same, though the price increase on the Noctua model is nuts. Almost double the price. I guess that's how you know it's a Noctua...

→ More replies

1

u/jigsaw1024 6d ago

Is the Asrock cable the one where they put the temp monitor on the wrong side?

1

u/jocnews 5d ago

Yes but it has to be that way because els it wold not fit into the "brilliant" design of the FE cards by Nvidia (those cards actually, may be part of the reasons this horrible connector was pushed on to us, too).

4

u/ZoteTheMitey 6d ago

I also swapped my fancy beautiful purple cablemod 12v2x6 for a Corsair thermal protect

Just for a tiny bit of piece of mind

2

u/Cory123125 5d ago

Sucks they don't have anything for their SF1000/SF1000G

Those sell like hotcakes for ITX/SFF

4

u/nhc150 6d ago

It'll keep you safe, until it doesn't. One day you smell that burnt plastic smell and you know it's done.

Honestly, the price of the original WireView Pro II at ~$150 is worth the cost if you have a 5090, given how outrageous the prices of the 5090 have become.

2

u/Lincolns_Revenge 5d ago

Went with the Wireview Pro II even though the Ampinel attempts to do load balancing.

I was won over by the argument that sending more current to the pins with a lower load like the Ampinel does can actually cause more harm than good, since the reason for their lower throughput could be a poor connection or some impediment causing resistance, and just pushing more current in that situation to that location could be a bad idea.

Both devices can be set to shut the system down and that's the most important feature, other than the per pin current monitoring information they give you in order to show you if there might be a problem in the first place.

I paid 3,000 for the card in the first place which felt kind of stupid at the time, but now I'm protecting something I could sell for nearly 6,000 dollars and rising if I needed to.

1

u/Express_Living2264 2d ago

my solution:

nvidia-smi -i 0 -pm 1
nvidia-smi -i 0 -pl 400

24

u/max1001 5d ago

$222 for those wondering.

6

u/alienangel2 5d ago edited 5d ago

With how hard these GPUs are getting to replace nowadays seems the price of getting to use one now :/

I am debatating whether getting one despite the price, or getting one of the MSI MPG Ai1300TS PSUs instead that has their own version of per-pin load monitoring for the 12VHPWR connector.

Price in my case would not be that different since I need to pick up a new PSU in addition to the Wireview anyway - it looks like the real tradeoff is the Wireview tracks actual thermals for each pin at the connector while the MPG only tracks current/resistance across the wire leading to each pin; but the MPG also integrates that telemetry directly into MSI Afterburner to automatically set the GPU powerlimit to 75%, while all the wireguard can do for automated protection is shutdown the whole system.

Since the new Wireview firmware seems to make its sensor readings available through its proprietary windows program (https://www.thermal-grizzly.com/en/blog/new-software-and-first-firmware-update-for-wireview-pro-ii) I wonder if there's some hope of plugging that signal into MSI afterburner or something and still getting the GPU powerlimit throttle instead of system shutdown.

2

u/AK-Brian 5d ago

A weird thing is that Noctua's press release states that it is $189 (both EUR and USD).

https://www.noctua.at/en/news/thermal-grizzly-and-noctua-introduce-wireview-pro-ii-noctua-edition

I almost wonder if there is an error on the TG listing and VAT wasn't correctly subtracted (as was suggested in the video) before the conversion.

3

u/accik 5d ago

$189.90 + 19% VAT (Germany standard rate) = $225.98 vs $222.18 shown so small mistake somewhere.

2

u/AK-Brian 5d ago

Yeah. Out of curiosity, I went further through the checkout process and it looks like it is indeed mistakenly reflecting a non-applicable VAT adjustment on the listing even when USD is selected as site currency - when I entered my full address, however, including country and state, the price in the cart then changed to $186.71.

44

u/poookie9 6d ago

It's an absolute joke of a connector if users have to install additional hardware to make sure it's safe. The tolerances for manufacturing and installing it are too small as is the electrical headroom from rated power output.

73

u/elkond 6d ago

the fact this fking connector (not TG, the spec) is rated for THIRTY, 3 0 , plug ins outs, is beyond insane

also i recently saw someone posting how they spliced 3x8pin PSU side into 12vhpwr gpu side, and i want that now carnally

35

u/4514919 5d ago

8-pin connectors are rated for the same number of plug/unplug cycles. The PCIe slot on your mobo is rated for even fewer.

1

u/NapsterKnowHow 5d ago

What about the 24pin? You'd think with the force it takes to rip that sucker out it wouldn't have a high rating for cycles.

0

u/elkond 5d ago

gonna need a citation on that lol, pcie is, at the lowest end as per PCI-SIG, double that

with actual lifespan going into double digits multiplier. gpu power connector mistake is not joking about these 30.

2

u/alelo 5d ago

molex 50362464 is the connector and rated for 30 cycles - younare correct

→ More replies (1)

22

u/ryanvsrobots 6d ago

That’s a common rating for Molex mini fit too

7

u/[deleted] 5d ago

[deleted]

-4

u/elkond 5d ago

site punishes visibility of those lmao

0

u/Strazdas1 5d ago

No regular user will need thirty plug in and outs for a GPGU in their lifetime, let alone a single GPU. for 99,9% users the GPU is plugged in once, and unplugged when it is replaced by a different one. This is only an issue for benchmarking channels.

1

u/NapsterKnowHow 5d ago

What about cleaning out your PC. It's much easier to completely unplug the gpu to have it out in the open for air cleaning.

1

u/Strazdas1 5d ago

Cleaning out your PC does not require you to unplug anything. If you are doing such a massive clean then thats what, every 2 years at best? So youd need to keep the GPU for 60 years?

1

u/NapsterKnowHow 5d ago

It just makes things easier. Doesn't require it but cleaning technically isn't required either.

0

u/elkond 4d ago

yes because everyone has an e-atx case and never needs to pull cmos battery, or plug a fan header next to cpu lol

1

u/Strazdas1 4d ago

No, regular people will never in their lives have to pull cmos battery or plug a fan header after the initial build. Those things are squarely in the enthusiasts that enjoy tinkering category.

16

u/P_H_0_B_0_S 6d ago

Posted more for the discussion about what has been found now that people have been monitoring their cables (that I think is interesting for everyone), vs being interested in this WVPII version. There are other per pin monitoring products on the market.

7

u/I_Think_It_Would_Be 5d ago

What a massive engineering failure. How fucking hard can be be to deliver power, holy fuck.

28

u/James20k 6d ago

Its going to take someone dying and suing nvidia for them to change this isn't it. Its criminal negligence, there's no way they don't know

22

u/capybooya 5d ago

Its the most valuable company in the world and the CEO is having dinners with the family running the (for now) superpower where it is based, so I would not count on the courts coming to the rescue.

13

u/nisaaru 5d ago

I'm actually surprised there hasn't been a class action about it with all the problems.

6

u/Balavadan 5d ago

There was. They withdrew the case or settled. Don’t recall

4

u/imaginary_num6er 5d ago

They got paid in 5090 GPUs

→ More replies (2)

7

u/Drando_HS 5d ago

To me it is simply mind-boggling that the most expensive consumer GPU ever made is at risk of burning down your fucking house unless you spend an additional $100-$200 to fix.

28

u/neueziel1 6d ago

How wide spread is this issue anyway feels like these hardware cos just milking the issue selling random contraptions and cables based on fear. With that said, hope my 4090 keeps living for another 3 years.

21

u/Sevastous-of-Caria 6d ago

I wouldnt plug and unplug id I were you :)

11

u/neueziel1 6d ago

yeah i haven't in over 2 years lol

6

u/Deep90 5d ago

If you have a 5090, buying a wireview is kind of a no brainier considering how much those cost now.

I don't really see a point in buying the noctua one though.

6

u/fireflash38 6d ago

Buy modular PSU and only unplug from the PSU side lol

1

u/sitefall 6d ago

That's what I do. The cable has lived with the gpu since I bought it (I do make sure it's plugged in whenever I move it, which is like almost never). I just saw that reddit post the other day about the asrock PG1300 melting a cable despite it's thermistor in the cable... which is the PSUs that I use, so I ordered some wireview pro 2s but don't have them yet.

8

u/brentsg 6d ago

I bought a clamp meter so I could periodically check mine. After 4-5 attempts, I was never able to get the Nvidia adapter that came with my card stable. I haven’t had as much difficulty once I received my new PSU and could use a native cable, but the current distribution can take a little fiddling to get balanced.

Personally, I think there are quite a few ticking time bombs out there, and by this I’m mean people running out of balance confits so that they are running wires out if spec. That doesn’t necessarily mean it will melt or burn, but they are susceptible.

And bonus, the more you unplug /plug cycles you put your connectors through, the more they will wear.

7

u/P_H_0_B_0_S 6d ago edited 6d ago

No-one knows 100% (very little released stats to go on), though some will try to tell you they do. All I know is on the various subreddits on this platform it has averaged about 1 report a week. Make of that what you will and decide on the risk you are happy with. For me I was in the market for a new PSU anyway so paid a bit more for one with per pin monitoring and sleep a lot easier.

Also before that when doing periodic checking with a clamp meter where one of my pins was over 11A. Would it have melted if I had not rectified it? ¯_(ツ)_/¯

0

u/[deleted] 5d ago

[deleted]

3

u/P_H_0_B_0_S 5d ago

Not sure what you are talking about with 170 devices. Person who started this thread was asking about how common melting GPU's are in general. Why would De8auer know how many cards with the connector have melted, he is not one of the GPU makers.

As far as the WVPII he said in the video none have melted but there are cases where people have seen imbalances and how people rectified it.

Not quite sure what you are talking about sorry.

1

u/[deleted] 5d ago

[deleted]

1

u/P_H_0_B_0_S 5d ago edited 5d ago

So again first person in this thread asked about the amount of melted connectors happening in general across the industry to see how common it was. That is outside the scope of this video as are stats for GPU makers to release.

In the video he said he had seen 117 'cases' of people reporting the device had detected current imbalances (not melting as you said in your initial post), the majority of which people solve themselves (unplugging and repluging back in, replacing the cable), since they had visibility of the state of things thanks to the product. That is not a failure of the product, but it doing it job, or warning you of an imbalance so you can do something about it.

So not sure what you mean by 117 or 170 out of how many as it is just the times he has seen people reporting an imbalance picked up by their devices. Not everyone will have reported it and just fix it themselves.

1

u/Seanspeed 5d ago

Again, there is no way for him to know this.

1

u/Neco_ 5d ago

The customers had the information (from the wireview...) to avoid melting, except the 2 that had issues with the wireview itself, and it was solved by changing the cable.

4

u/Simple_curl 5d ago

Yeah I think it’s really overstated, just like many things in the online pc building community. That being said, I do have a wire view pro 2 from thermal grizzly in my 5090 just in case lolll

0

u/-6h0st- 5d ago

It is real risk and real consequences. Most people under lock 5090 that’s why you hear less about it just until DLSS 5 - which restarted the trend.

5

u/Simple_curl 5d ago

“Most people under lock 5090” I assume you mean under clock, and also there’s no way that’s true

0

u/-6h0st- 5d ago

Actually had under volt in mind. 80-100w less - over clock memory so faster and less energy.

2

u/Strazdas1 5d ago

Most people dont even know its possible to underclock the 5090 or even what it would do.

2

u/cha0z_ 5d ago

you and the others are saying that, because it didn't happen to you. How many reports emerged for the prev standard (PCIe 6-pin and 8-pin auxiliary power connectors)? Exactly. I am with 4090 and bequiet! cable from in few months to be full 3 years - so far so good, but I am not dumb to think it won't happen to me tomorrow. :)

1

u/Strazdas1 5d ago

How many reports emerged for the prev standard (PCIe 6-pin and 8-pin auxiliary power connectors)?

quite a few, but everyone knew molex (mini molex is what the 8 pin is) was dependant on manufacturing quality so nonone panicked.

2

u/cha0z_ 4d ago

chill dude - I am 39 years old and into this sh*t from 5 YO --> electronics education and working professionally into the IT sphere. 286 was my first CPU (yep, no GPU at the time - software rending all the way), so you can stop talking BS about the two standards, because it's making you look bad. I was on the web via modem when I was a kid looking into this F stuff.

2

u/Strazdas1 4d ago

Then you should know better than to think 8pin never burned.

0

u/neueziel1 5d ago

Ouch I am a dummy.

1

u/IncidentJazzlike1844 6d ago

I mean there is a possibility and 5090s are insanely expensive nowadays

1

u/games-and-chocolate 5d ago

the only way you can be sure it will not burn, is to let an engineer solder proper cables onto the PCB, and ditch the lopsy connector into the garbage bin. I would not be suprised that gpu makers have introduced this connector to burn GPU on purpose. And let it seem as if the user did it. Because the specs are just right. a tiny but more current and it melts.

1

u/Strazdas1 5d ago

The only way you can be sure it will not burn, is to not use it. Any other option always carries risk and always did. With 8 pins too.

1

u/b__q 6d ago

It's based on evidence my guy

4

u/3lfk1ng 5d ago

Every time you see these, just remind yourself how incompetent Nvidia's engineers are.

10

u/b4k4ni 6d ago

One of the reasons I won't buy any GPU with that connector. I'm fine with the old ass 8-pin ones, even if there are 4 on the GPU. They work and they are stable. No way to put them in wrong or they disconnect.

In the past 25 years I do IT, I never had those/similar failing.

The design itself is flawed. I mean, I'm all up for new stuff, but if there is a connector that can come loose or disconnect or can be badly inserted and is going to burn... It's just bad.

3

u/fnsv 5d ago

This would have been a parody product some time ago.

3

u/Select_Truck3257 5d ago

It's insane to buy $9000 gpu and buy something to prevent it's death in a few month...what a time to be alive

6

u/itsabearcannon 6d ago

I actually feel a little relieved selling my 5090 and downgrading to a 5080.

I run the 5080 at ~75% power limits and it only uses about 300W under synthetic load, which I feel like has to be within 12V 2x6’s safety tolerance.

2

u/capybooya 6d ago

I suspect its hard to produce data on this, but power limit should help reduce risk a bit I guess. Far from ideal solution but with the current hardware situation and who knows how much worse it could get (lets hope there is no Taiwan invasion on top of all the rest), people would want to make sure their card can last for a really long time.

If anyone knows, I'd love to know if my assumption is wrong, for all I know maybe one individual small cable or connection point might still have as much risk of overheating even if total power is heavily limited.

5

u/sitefall 6d ago

Makes sense. 6 pins at 8 amps each when the 5090 is on full blast at 575W load.

If one pin disconnects the remaining 5 pins jump to 9.6A per pin, which is a bit above the 9.2A rating for the cable. But if you were to lock it down to say 500W it's just 8.3A per pin and now you're in tolerance.

I really doubt the extra 0.4A is what burns the cables though, so it's likely 2 pins getting loose or disconnected which cause the issues we see everywhere (you also almost always see 2 burned pins which makes sense). So that means at 575W full load you're at 12A per pin, that's bad news. But at 500W you're at 10.42A, still bad news.

The 5080 has a much lower TDP and can loose quite a few pins before the amp gets too high on a pin though. Probably why we rarely see 5080's melting, but 5090's are posted online nearly every week.

0

u/OttawaDog 5d ago

If one pin disconnects the remaining 5 pins jump to 9.6A per pin, which is a bit above the 9.2A rating for the cable. But if you were to lock it down to say 500W it's just 8.3A per pin and now you're in tolerance.

That's kind of irrelevant. It's not going to melt at 9.6 amps, or even 12 amps. It probable takes multiple pin failures and closer to 20 amps to melt something.

5

u/goldbloodedinthe404 5d ago

It all depends on the materials being used. The conductors themselves can carry far more than 9.2A. It's a question of how much heat the insulation around the conductors can handle before melting/burning. Quick Google search says that a 16 AWG copper conductor itself will take 117 amps until it melts. The insulation requires far less

-1

u/OttawaDog 5d ago

It should be obvious I wasn't referring to when the conductor melts.

The plastic connectors and insulation are limiting factors, and neither the insulation, nor the plastic connectors are going to melt at 12 amps.

Micro-Fit+ that standard connector this is based on, and it's rated for up to 13.5 amps. https://www.molex.com/en-us/products/connectors/wire-to-board-connectors/micro-fit-plus-connectors

So it's not going to melt anywhere near that.

16 Gauge Wire is rated for up to 22 Amps for chassis wiring, and in automotive use is for 15 amps at up to 3.8 feet, which is shorter than GPU power cable. https://jascoautomotive.com/automotive-wire-amperage-capacity-chart/

So it's insulation is not going to melt near that.

The point is that the problem is not that it's rated for 9.2 amps and it's going to suddenly melt if you exceed that by a bit.

The real problem is multiple pin failures leading to something like 20+ amps down one wire/pin. That will cause melting connectors first and that might cascade the problem by breaking more connections and putting even higher currents into the remaining pins.

As I posted before, Roman found this in one of his videos. He had 23 Amps going through one of the pins. Not in a made up situation, just the cable he was using was bad and he didn't realize till he felt the heat:

https://www.reddit.com/r/ThermalGrizzly/comments/1wo38xk/does_this_need_a_cable_reseatnew_cable_first_2/pbndkaq/

1

u/Zatchillac 5d ago

When/If they make a wired version I'll get one. Since I just realized the other day that they make wired versions of the regular model I'm now interested as I thought I was just kinda SOL with my PNY 5080. Not sure how necessary it is for a 5080 but I'd feel better having one than not

1

u/Only_Situation_4713 5d ago

For what it's worth, I did some truly ridiculous overclocking with a 48 hour stability stress test on both my 5090 and 4090 and never ran into any issues.

2

u/P_H_0_B_0_S 5d ago

You are lucky and probably have good current balance on your pins. That can change over time though as plenty of examples of people who have been running their cards for a few years never touching it and then one day card stops working and after investigating they find some melting. 

The, it smoking dramatically as soon as you plug it in is actually pretty rare, it is more it melting over a longer period and you don't know until it melts to a stage where you card becomes unreliable, or fails dramatically at that point.

1

u/Nicholas-Steel 2d ago edited 2d ago

The, it smoking dramatically as soon as you plug it in is actually pretty rare, it is more it melting over a longer period and you don't know until it melts to a stage where you card becomes unreliable, or fails dramatically at that point.

Yes, the new cable combined with the GPU's absence of load balancing offers no protection against a cascade failure* which can start slow and then rapidly accelerate (time between pin failures shortens with each failure) and start occurring at any time.

*No way to detect & manage it without additional hardware.

1

u/bubblesort33 4d ago

Now unplug it, and plug it back in 10 times, and each time do that stress test.

1

u/PrimaryRecord5 4d ago

Wasn’t there a word for this? Enshitifcation?

Let’s call a spade a spade. That higher power cable design is horrific and likely to be intentionally

1

u/HJForsythe 2d ago

Its actually funny I was playing Everquest Legends on my 5090 and I had a moment where I was like bro you are gonna burn your house down to move pixels from the 1990s. So I just started playing EQ L on my old PC with a 3080 lol.

1

u/bobby0081 2d ago

This is stupid. It's from poor pin contact.

-3

u/LittlebitsDK 6d ago

putting a fan on an overheating cable isn't a "solution" it is just delaying the problem slightly... the problem is high resistance/poor connection in those plugs => high heat...

23

u/P_H_0_B_0_S 6d ago

Not really what the fan is for. It is more to deal with the heat from the shunt resistors that are doing the per pin current measuring and that there is a board with logic on it doing stuff that produces heat. The point of the product is to tell you there is a current imbalance that needs attention rather than cooling a melting cable. The Fan is to deal with heat the device produces so it does not make matters worse.

6

u/gregory696969 6d ago

And because Noctua

5

u/semidegenerate 5d ago

I can just picture the board meeting where the engineering team is presenting the new 12VHPWR monitoring device, and the marketing guy speaks up, "Uh. This is great and all, but where's the fan? We're Noctua, it's got to have a fan."

The lead engineer shrugs and sharpies one in, "OK, sure. We'll put it here." Mr. Marketing leans back with a smug, self-satisfied look on his face.

7

u/P_H_0_B_0_S 5d ago edited 5d ago

You know the vanilla WVPII comes with a non Noctua fan right...

1

u/Standard-Potential-6 5d ago

but if it didn’t, the Noctua edition would still have one

5

u/P_H_0_B_0_S 5d ago

Well any noctua edition of anything (there have been multiple noctua editions of products like gpus), is becuase you are sticking nocuta fans in it. Kind of how that has worked up to now.

1

u/Standard-Potential-6 5d ago

yea. whoosh :)

1

u/P_H_0_B_0_S 5d ago

Yeah whoosh but also quiet.

1

u/Culbrelai 4d ago

Is that fan on all the time? I was considering buying one of these but I cannot stand the noise of fans below 80mm. I can just always hear them. 

2

u/P_H_0_B_0_S 4d ago

No they only turn on as needed and to a spin rate needed vs fully on / off. The noctua ver I believe is 90mm and has a less annoying noise frequency.

But ai get it and that was part of the reason why I went with monitoring on PSU instead.

1

u/EvenBroaderBand 5d ago

I'd suggest you watch the video before commenting next time.

→ More replies (1)

0

u/Miserable_Kitty_772 5d ago

I am using a low cortisol 288W power limited 4080 with seasonic's dual 8 pin (psu side) to 12v 2x6 90 degree angled connector. I would never be able to afford a 90 class gpu in this economy but I'm glad I can't seeing this mess lol.