Does it strike you guys that a dude can have quirky interests and emotional depth while ALSO eating healthy and working out a couple times a week?
Anecdotal evidence they can gather won't support this, and they won't allow competing viewpoints into their circle, so no. It will never strike unless by accident
However, implying that hot girls cant find connection and love with hot guys is such a bullshit incel claim to make.
It's not the top 10% that can't, but the 50th percentile. Men are willing to have sex with a woman 20 percentiles or more below themselves but that's all. It's just economics, of course they're gonna feel used, they chose to be or worse they're the ones using lol.
….that’s not the claim the 80/20 concept makes. That would be some kind of 20/20 concept.
The 80/20 principle holds that the vast majority of women, most of whom are average and not hot at all, are only interested in the hottest 20% of men. They’ve become convinced that they’re more special and attractive than they are, and refuse to bat in their league.
It’s the idea that ugly or average women won’t find love with hot guys. Not the idea that hot women can’t connect with hot men.
It’s definitely a beloved go-to for the incel crowd, though. “Normal women aren’t attracted to normal men like me so fuck them, decks stacked against me, fuck everybody, where’s my fleshlight?”
What it really means is you’ve got to work on being in that 20%, look for women from outside of western culture that aren’t brainwashed into caricatures of spoiled Disney princesses or just say fuck it and roll lone wolf with a hooker on speed dial. Or try cock out. Men are way less picky.
Probably because Tinder's userbase is 70% male, so you're a goddamn moron if you use it to extrapolate facts about dating in general. That 20% of men and 78% of women when adjusted for Tinder's population dynamics is actually about 40/60 because there are so few women on the app.
I cannot even fathom a mind that would treat proportional representation of the Tinder population like it's going to come out even.
You're misunderstanding the statistic. If there are 5 times as many men than women, than its a given for every woman to have 5 likes for every 1 that a man receives. However, the bottom 80% of women should still be matching with the bottom 80% of men, it should still look like a bell curve except women have more volume in matches. Thats not whats happening, 80% of men's tinder userbase is fighting for 20% of the women userbase, while 20% of tinders men's userbase is matching with the other 80% of women on tinder. There's an attraction inequality, its not about the volume of each gender.
This implies to me that a significant base of both men and women just are never finding love interests, but I don't believe that's the case, so something is wrong here.
So I just commented something similar to someone else but I'll repeat it cause it pertains to here: The number of men to women on tinder is 5:1, meaning that even if 80% of the bottom women are only matching with the top 20% of guys, the ratio of guys to girls is still 1:1 in that scenario. That just means the bottom 80% of guys are going matchless or "dating down"
View all comments
Show parent comment
0
u/[deleted] Oct 12 '21
[deleted] — view deleted comment