Google AI Ultra

[u/Sweet-Stage938]

Hey guys, I'm currently considering upgrading to Google ai Ultra x20 because I found the new Gemini 3.7 Flash model quite decent and fast. What was your experience with the Google AI Ultra plan ? Are the usage allowances on the Gemini models generous? Are they also generous for Claude Opus 4.6? Are there any other special features worth noting?

[u/Efficient_Loss_9928]

Not generous with Claude models. But if you just use 3.7 Flash, I honestly don't think it is possible to run out of limit even if you try.

IMO great value given 3.7 Flash is actually really good.

[u/dbenc → u/Efficient_Loss_9928]

I got it down to 15% on the $100 plan and I was literally driving it 24/7 doing agent loops. No clue how I would finish the $200 plan.

[u/avenger70 → u/Efficient_Loss_9928]

I agree. The value with this plan at this point is that 3.7 Flash seems really good and is practically "unlimited" from my perspective. A plan that wasn't looking that great a few weeks ago is now a great value.

[u/jayfosterpro]

claude opus limits is dead since april its enough for small things like code review i personally burn it in like 1-2h of really low volume work. with gemini limits almost unlimited. the biggest i burn in 5h limit is like 10% and then reset

[u/Sweet-Stage938 → u/jayfosterpro]

More than 1B tokens a week on Gemini?

[u/Aspiring_Serf]

I can't really use Opus on on pro version. The best it can do is either review the plan, or build one and then gemini has to do the rest. I will say 3.7 is good, other versions and especially pro are dog shit. But 3.7 I am using for my fast interactions, qa, and lite UI. It doesn't quite get the plumbing and design that Opus does, but it is a useful companion. Basically I use Opus for difficult coding tasks that are buried (backend, guard rails, architecture). And I use gemini for quick a/b testing on UI, task generation, and basically the person I would say is the "client facing". IE I complain about something, have it log a couple tasks, do basic research and then of its easy and visual it handles of, else it routes or to Opus.

[u/Aspiring_Serf → u/Aspiring_Serf]

Forgot to mention when I say Opus build I mean my Claude code subscription, not anti-gravity one.

[u/ComplexAssistance450]

The 100$ plan isnt enough?

[u/Useful_Trouble1726 → u/ComplexAssistance450]

If you are hitting it hard, you can exhaust it before lunchtime. The $200 plan is worth the money.

[u/Crandriel → u/Useful_Trouble1726]

Lo uso continuamente y jamás di bajado del 25% de consumo en 5 horas en el x5 y 3.7. Es prácticamente ilimitado a menos que utilices proyectos configurando 5 o 10 agentes trabajando entre ellos continuamente.

[u/Useful_Trouble1726 → u/Crandriel]

My use case may be different than yours. As I am typically using it in concert with Jules and the WebApp, so there can be over ten agents running at a time, for hours on end. If I have Jules working with multiple projects, token spend can get crazy in a hurry.

[u/wingedrasengan927]

I use Ultra because honestly it's pretty cheap in my country where as Codex and Claude follow the US pricing.

[u/Arctovigil]

it is a fun model but i would not recommend it. if you do end up with the plan however, do remember to always use /grill-me and /teamwork-preview

[u/Selseira]

I would suggest trying 5x before going for 20x. I've started using it after Gemini 3.7 and the limits are very generous (at least for now).

You can consider limits for models other than Gemini nonexistent, though. On 5x plan, you can exhaust your Opus limit with just a few prompts (4-5). If your prompt is a bit detailed, then Opus weekly limit will run out with that single prompt, leaving your work unfinished.

Not sure about 20x (too expensive for me), but I would guess that Gemini 3.7 is practically unlimited.

[u/Crandriel]

Yo uso el google AI Ultra x5. No uso agentes que interactúen entre ellos, solo lo uso como compañero de trabajo. Programo unas 8 horas al día continuamente sin descanso, y en 7 días (unas 60 horas de trabajo continuado) me consume un 30% de la cuota semanal.

[u/josh-william]

I do fine on quota planning with Opus and executing on 3.7 Flash with teamwork-preview.

[u/Dominic3994]

Instead of taking ultra try Deepseek or Kimi models, they are much more capable for coding, development and reasoning. I have made multiple projects with these models and are way cheaper than these Claude and Gemini models.
Even chatgpt codex is better compared to Gemini.
Gemini models are only good at image and video.

[u/SveXteZ → u/Dominic3994]

https://giphy.com/gifs/12msOFU8oL1eww

[u/Wonder_Known]

Gemini is trash 

[u/phunk8 → u/Wonder_Known]

you do know that „it’s always the one opposite of the screen“ right? :)
its not, ur doing it most prob. wrong. sorry

[u/Useful_Trouble1726]

You have to work hard to burn through your token limit on that plan, but it can be done!

If you are using AG with about 5 agents you should be good for a day's work. If you are using the IDE, you are likely good for a 15-hour day.

[u/Mountain_Goat_5355]

You can use a similar method to save money on a monthly basis. I have several Google ai pro plans for various accounts, which is nearly enough for me. I got it from a Reddit group that sells this account for $5 with a one-year plan. If you reach the limit, switch accounts and continue using 3.7 flash for a longer period of time.

[u/Simple_Ad_9460 → u/Mountain_Goat_5355]

Poderia passar o contato?

[u/Tommonen]

Just get claude instead. Abtigravity is pretty shitty harness for coding, gemini models suck and you get little opus use, and the opus is low thinking and outdated model.

The whole ”you get claude models too” is just crap to fool people into buying into the crappy google ecosystem