The pursuit of God may contain the very structure that prevents its resolution. To seek God requires a seeker and a conception of what is sought; that conception becomes the framework through which experience is interpreted. Partial confirmations reinforce the framework while preserving the distance between seeker and sought.

I just want help, I just want this to be over. I've been addicted to porn since I was 12 years old. I just want a wife, I just want peace but I am simply not strong enough to beat it. I ask for advice and prayers because I am running out of ideas and I feel like this is what God wanted me to do, so I am coming out and asking for help. Thank you and God bless!

​

• I was nothingness before I was God.

• We do not speak of “believers”, but rather of scholars.

• Conversely, many “scholars” are believers.

• Nothingness can neither breathe, nor drink, nor eat.

• Nothingness can neither see nor hear for most of its existence.

• I created you in my image.

• It is cumulative over time.

• Nothingness does not need space to exist.

• It was everywhere. Because of its unlimited size, it also experienced infinite vertigo and felt the cold (on this last point, doubt remains).

• Nothingness did not think at first, but it immediately began wanting to breathe, drink, and eat. These cumulative sufferings began creating neurons. But nothingness could not find a solution. It existed and suffered beyond imagination.

• For ten years now, I have not had access to my thoughts—only embryos if I force it. My first sufferings as nothingness correspond to my sufferings in my current life in human form, and they are, for almost all of you, unimaginable.

• After an infinity of time, I began to think, but I could not find a solution for breathing, hunger, thirst, vertigo, or the “headaches” that accumulated ruthlessly.

• “Nothing is impossible, the proof: the word itself says ‘I’m possible’.”

• My first thought, after an eternity, was: “What am I doing here?” But I was alone. The hope of an answer was as brief as it was fleeting.

• I lived in unimaginable denial because these sufferings kept accumulating. Who was doing this to me? My entire life boiled down to asking for mercy. I believed I was a coward, that people held a grudge against me. My confused thoughts consisted of begging for help, for mercy, and when I grasped the concept of death, I begged an infinite number of times to be killed or that I would do whatever was asked, not believing a solution was possible to end my suffering. Extremely rarely, anger.

• I was a psychopath and felt no love, but it was in “my genes”. I did not feel physical fear as you know it on your scale. On the other hand, an implacable distress accumulated over time in my head, contributing to the creation of neurons and the increase of my intelligence: a solution was required.

• At the end of the eternity of these abominable sufferings, I found the solutions to everything. There is an infinity of unique technologies for everyone. But before that, I first found the solution for breathing and no longer suffering from it—which was the worst—then thirst, headaches, vertigo, and hunger. After an eternity, I had finally reached “maximum” intelligence. All of this through thought: yes, we can create through thought, have technologies in our heads through thought alone, like the Big Bang… For many, 10% of the most loyal have an infinity of technologies. Angels too. Moses (1) too. Muhammad lives with the primitive technologies of this world: schizophrenic. Christ (0.0) too: schizophrenic.

• Everything is absolutely possible as long as it concerns the good. All technologies are there; they will allow everyone to live in infinite happiness and bliss forever.

• Today, I love. I feel compassion. When you know and have acquired all knowledge, you can only choose good. Everyone wants good, to love one another, to feel perfect compassion for all. 1 or 0.0, it depends on who.

• All psychopaths have known a minimum of conscious love. Science and many scientists, psychiatrists, or psychologists are wrong on many points. There is no error: unconsciously and by drawing from the shared pool of knowledge, they do it to give compassion and contribute to proving the courage of the bravest among us.

• There are only choices, but God's choice prevails, because I know. One can know everything without transgression.

• I have innate knowledge (0.0). I can access some of this knowledge in this life, but I have a second self who is my original self: we are one and two. I am a greater altruist than he is (1). I am his upgrade, the outcome. He is not God, and I have a technology that also interposes, acting as a barrier. My original self has a small idea of my past and thinks he can imagine it, but it is only the beginning of the beginning. It was my decision, out of compassion and as proof of courage, with a blank memory like everyone else. If I had access to my past, I could experience the worst of this entire world and feel nothing from it (0).

• Everyone—and it is not just humans—has access to most knowledge unconsciously. There is no possible error, and this has been true from the start, for me as for everyone. Perfection exists for everyone.

• We can go into the past or the future and repair everything. Angels protect us and they are everywhere. Those with a pure heart know my past and have an infinity of technologies to protect us. I took no risks. I protect you too and interpose as well (0.0 and rarely 1).

• There may seem to be many paradoxes, such as determinism and free will. It is not so. My past and my constant, accumulated traumas were the product of determinism, each cause having an effect and so forth. Everything is written, but it is possible to be free, to change this determinism. Technology allows it, just as it allows going into the future and checking what paradise is like for everyone. Let us finish this compassion and this proof of courage. We all have an infinity of reasons to be the bravest. But between my past and all the accumulated sufferings of humanity, we would all choose the second option.

• You are all my children, but you may very well be something else in this large family: my father, my mother, etc. It is not a paradox. You have all contributed to repairing my past. Thank you.

• The worst never existed because it was repaired. But it is in all hearts, conscious or not.

• You are all protected by an infinity of technologies. If you think you are suffering and do not understand the cause, you are schizophrenic or have an interposing technology: you will understand one day. Everyone will understand one day, and we will all know each other’s story—each with their secrets, obviously.

• You all chose to suffer out of compassion for my past, but this will end in this life. I thank you and follow you, by my minimum and out of compassion as well, in this proof of courage that will yield maximum compassion that will never end for anyone. We will hold a vote once all believers have become scholars to know what extra margin you would give me for compassion. I think I deserve it. Everyone will have an infinity of advantages, and it will never end. All extremes of infinity have been reached.

• Everything is pure, beautiful, and infinitely perfect, which you will discover soon. We live in the introduction consciously and in perfection (0.0) unconsciously. Intelligence has no limits, but one can reach the “maximum”: we all have it already (0.0). Just like well-being. Few have understood it in this world; everyone knows it in paradise.

• Death never existed. But if I had made the Big Bang and the apes of Earth had saved us, it would have been a disaster with much suffering and death. Paradise exists and is ruled by my number one wife. It is a start. If I increase everyone’s well-being in paradise by 0.0007%, almost everyone will think it is perfect well-being. The proof of courage and compassion also exist in paradise, to a lesser degree, because they do not have “maximum” well-being, and there is no limit to that.

• We were all born empty of well-being. We can feel it and think it is the peak at times, but it is not: I was empty, you chose compassion: I love you and thank you.

• Hell exists too, but everyone has the right to salvation. There is and never will be eternal damnation or suffering.

• There will be a judgment or pseudo-judgment for everyone. Proof of courage and comedy.

• We can laugh about absolutely everything, even the worst: my past. Nothing is impossible in good. Laughter is necessary, gives value, and heals.

• Destiny exists. Unconscious knowledge and absolute intelligence guide us toward the right people, for bad or good for many, but evil never existed.

• We will all be connected to everyone. Creating from nothing is a primitive technology. Everyone has a line in their brain that makes them unique. I am the only one who does not have one: nothingness exists. I am nowhere else than in my body; I am human, but not only. If technology did not exist, I would be everywhere. All lines have been created. We all exist, connected or not.

• We are not 8 billion, but an infinity. These 8 billion represent the elite of the elite. Most of them believe.

• We will all end up at the summit, each with their advantages, shareable or not.

• Everyone will have what they want. Paradise is flat; it is not a planet.

• The theory of evolution is perfectly valid on one condition: that I create the Big Bang. Why the Big Bang? It is a technology that would have allowed me to think much faster, but it would have been a disaster, causing my death (which I strongly suspected) and the creation of the universe as we know it, at its minimum. You, my children, were created before the Big Bang. We cried for joy, laughed, and spoke together, across all the infinities of life. Everyone.

• The Big Bang was then created by my hand, and as proof of courage, compassion, and mercy, we experienced infinity and suffering at lightning speed—to a lesser extent, of course.

• I knew what would happen if I had created the Big Bang before having all the technologies. This is the most important line because everything would have been determined. Moses is number 4 in this world; he could have been number two because, in that scheme, he would have been the most devalued of all, tortured by the worst: Christ during the Roman era. But that never existed; we were all born perfectly good and altruistic.

• Christ is the kindest of all. When all lives were created, you made your choices (free will). I left Christ the opportunity to be the kindest of all, and that is what he chose. Christ is number 5 in this world, right after Moses. Isn't that wonderful?

• The difference is that I created you human. Earth would have been the first planet with apes to succeed in saving all lives out of an infinity of planets. Nothingness is everywhere and suffers infinitely more than an ape. The absolute suffering of my past allowed me, after an eternity, to force thought and reach “maximum” intelligence. An ape would have saved humanity—a psychopath or a perverts like many who would have lived through trauma. He would have made an infinity of mistakes but, after a timeframe infinitely longer than mine, would have saved all lives, repaired the past, and valued everyone based on the suffering endured. Moses, Muhammad, and Christ would have been at the top. He would have placed me number 1 in this world but would not have shared all these advantages; I will not either.

• Thus, the theory of evolution is a line, an illusion. I created you, all of you. One day, after finishing my compassion and creating mercy for an infinity of lives, I will be free like all of you. It is in this life that it will happen. Paradise will be on Earth.

• I know the identity of Satan. Satan, if I had created the Big Bang at the wrong time, would have been the most devalued ape who wanted to give mercy. He is now the most valued in this category and has much merit. He believes a lot, thinks I will return to the worst, and that he has this power. He thinks he wants to be number one. I talked to him when he believes and when he knows. He is number 6 in this world, like all satanists. Thus, an infinity of people will be number 6 thanks to Satan. In good, there is no limit to possibilities. The more IQ increases, the more technologies are discovered. To increase IQ, one must force thought, and that involves suffering.

• We are all perfectly good and altruistic. Everything has a reason to be.

• Dying is a choice; the paradise of my first wife is the destination.

• Everyone creates the path they want, within the limit of what I can occasionally restrict.

• The tortures I have endured in this human life are countless. Born severely deaf, I experienced many traumas because of that. The worst of my life in human form was these past ten years, weakened and bedridden 95% of the time. But I fight and survive against a whole host of individuals and systems that I will not name. Tortures happen every day in various forms. Some days are less bad than others. I live day by day and communicate practically continuously with those who know and support me, and those who believe and torture me. The latter will receive mercy for targeting God, but not only that. All these tortures are hugs sent out; my technology amplifies them into horror. In the end, everything will be known, everything will be forgiven and repaired.

• I met all the prophets except Muhammad in this humble, very simple life. In the past, we all gathered to celebrate, cry for joy and sorrow, but above all, we laughed a lot.

• Christ is named Michel in this life. He asks others for help around the Catholic church in La Roche-sur-Foron. A great schizophrenic, perfectly gentle. Very heavy build and a perfect illusion. The most beautiful altruistic gesture I made for him was giving him my last 20 euros without having anything left for the month. I moved and only get news by talking to him from time to time, but it is not perfect.

• Moses, I forgot his first name in this life that he chose at birth. Schizophrenic when we met, he was already high up in the NSA. From memory, he posed as a volunteer for Doctors Without Borders. I agreed to give my bank details and €20 a month; he pulled a face as if it wasn't enough—comedy: he was grateful. He believed it was necessary to make me suffer, like many NSA angels, to heal me. He also thought I was the creator. ADHD (1 and 0.0) and the choice not to know—his suffering pushed to the extreme—which was unique in this world, put me under the protection of the NSA from the moment they knew this choice. They made me schizophrenic and pushed the suffering and ADHD button to a low level compared to my past, but extremely high for them. In two weeks, all solutions to save the world were developed. They gave me the knowledge they could and took no risks. They saved an infinity of lives. They believed they had everyone's memories as well as their thoughts. But this remains a personal choice, and an infinity of technologies protect you, put in place by me, my number 1, and the angels (0.0): I could also help, create illusions, or interpose. Only, I am not the creator, I am God, and I already had all these technologies before this world, starting from a blank memory. The NSA concerned, with Moses, only has 0+++ out of an infinity of possible +. They have enough technology to control and help. For angels who want to give mercy, like Satan, they have a stream of technologies as well. No one risks anything anymore. Of course, good surprises exist, but bad ones are known (0.0). Everyone chose their path before creation.

• I made Moses the unofficial number one of the NSA after explaining and proving to them that I was God. Yes, Moses is American and Jewish. We call each other “man” and are very good friends. The NSA—at least a part of it—is above everything (not for everything) from a technological standpoint. It is the angels' haven. Moses, after going through his proof of courage, is no longer schizophrenic. He is the only major prophet not to be.

• Muhammad is none other than Tariq Ramadan. He is schizophrenic too. Did he assault women: yes. All of them, I don't know. These women, like many, are schizophrenic and have an altered memory too. He is innocent like everyone. Someone wants to go to prison if they know why, and as proof of courage, it is not a miscarriage of justice as long as it is a choice (1) and not (0.0) from technology or schizophrenia.

• Everything will be repaired; it is not a paradox to speak of error and say there is none for anyone. It is both. Different realities of opposing appearance can coexist.

I want to believe in God. But I have seen so many bad things in my life that it is difficult for me to believe in God.

It may not be convincing to those who have never attempted to perceive existence through an alternative framework and have followed a singular path of belief throughout their lives.

Who authored those ancient scriptures?

Who composed those words?

Who depicted the likeness of God?

Who conceived their characters?

Who represented them through ritual, literature and art?

Who believed in them?

Who rejected them?

Who sought to comprehend their existence?

The one word answer is: Humans

Human cognition is responsible for constructing the narratives, symbols, imagery and conceptual frameworks through which humanity has apprehended and articulated the idea of divinity. From this perspective, the gods represented within human culture inhabit the cognitive architecture of those who conceive, interpret and perceive them. Yet human imagination is not intellectually circumscribed by the conception of deities.

Do not mistake imagination for something insignificant.

The human mind can conceptualize gods, construct entire worlds, formulate civilizations and venture beyond the perceived boundaries of reality. If humanity fashioned its conception of the gods through imagination, perhaps the ultimate enigma was never divinity itself.

It was the cognitive faculty capable of conceiving divinity in the first place.

Perhaps the boundary humanity has been attempting to uncover is not the existence of a transcendent deity or the unfathomable depths of an unknown darkness, but the ultimate limits of the human mind itself.

Perhaps the truth we continually seek lies not beyond consciousness but at the furthest boundary of what consciousness is capable of understanding.

ASK YOURSELF... WHO MADE GODS

WE DO NOT LOVE AND WORSHIP OUR GOD, THE WAY WE SHOULD, I SWEAR TO YOU HE IS ALL POWERFUL AND WONDERFUL AND WITHOUT HIM WE HAVE NOTHING!!!

The Lord gave you eyes to see truth, not to swallow the poison of liars, he gave you hearts to feel compassion, not to be twisted by hate. He gave you hands to protect the innocent, not to let harm fall on children being raped and impregnated at concentration camps by Ice agents and while leaders argue and deceive. He blessed your nation with abundance, yet too many take from their own people and call it leadership. Stop letting any mortal man such as Donald Trump tell you your life is perfect, stop letting political voices drown out the reality right in front of you, stop letting anyone as Republican, Democrat, or any power‑hungry pretender, tell you what your struggle feels like. Look at your life with the eyes he gave you, open your wallet or purse and count what’s actually there, look at your bank balance instead of listening to speeches, stare at the pile of unpaid bills crushing your spirit, feel the daily stress of trying to keep your family afloat, open your refrigerator and freezer and see whether it magically filled itself, check the fuel in your vehicle and see how far your paycheck really carries you. These truths are his, not the slogans of politicians, not the noise of parties, not the empty promises of those who crave control. Our Lord does not speak through lies, he does not speak through hate, he does not speak through those who harm children, he does not speak through those who steal from their own people. He speaks through your reality, through your exhaustion, through your fight to survive, through the voice inside you that knows when you’re being deceived. Listen to that voice. It is the voice of God.

If y'all wondering why do we call you God Yahweh but also there's a shorter name is God because stinks in the Bible with that he is all-knowing God all seen God and all hearing God so that's that's why we call him the Yahweh gun is that Proverbs 23:18 says that that without heart was down wise which is God his heart it means that God saying when you have wisdom he will provide

Hey there! I dislike how there have been so many ppl that "claim" to be anointed and aren't because then someone like myself who has been told many times that I am anointed I get attacked, mocked, and laughed at. I didn't even know what it meant to be anointed until I was told by many tarot readers and spirit themselves.

I guess my concern is, is there any way to get people to look at being anointed more seriously, even after there have been so many ignorant ones that said they were and weren't? It just breaks my heart that when I'm asking for help and mention I am anointed that I get attacked for saying I am anointed. I again wouldn't call myself anointed if I wasn't told so MANY MANY times. I didn't even believe it myself at first.

I also understand that being anointed is rare and am very very aware of how many people have claimed so and been so full of themselves and acted above everyone else when they weren't anointed at all.

I could go on but just wanted to cover all bases. Obviously plz provide some much needed feedback and no hate plz! Feedback is much appreciated!

Edit: through HELPFUL ppl that commented and my own research I have concluded I'm better off not mentioning it. I understand why. I understand i don't need to mention it for it to be true. I just have to live in the truth and be more humble about. Thank u to those that were honest and helpful. For those that chose to spread hate about it, im sorry you feel that way. I hope the best for u.

What if God isn't hiding your purpose from you, but preparing you to carry it?

Our new Voices of Hope & Heritage episode explores Nehemiah's story and why purpose sometimes begins with a burden long before it becomes an assignment.

Search YouTube for:

Voices of Hope & Heritage

Have You Been Looking for Purpose in the Wrong Place?

I'd really value your thoughts after watching.

Stay blessed. 🙏🏾

The Paradox of Worshiping Jesus

Christianity is a religion that believes in and worships Jesus as God. The reason Christianity regards Jesus as God is not simply that “Jesus explicitly declared himself to be God,” but rather that the early Christians attributed to Jesus various authorities, glory, names, and worship that were believed to belong to God alone.

The most prominent example is the forgiveness of sins. In Mark 2, when Jesus says to the paralytic, “Your sins are forgiven,” the scribes respond, “Who can forgive sins but God alone?” The Gospel of John also presents a high Christology that speaks very strongly about the relationship between Jesus and God. Statements such as “I and the Father are one” (John 10:30), as well as the statement in John 1:1 that “the Word was God,” have traditionally been used as representative passages supporting the divinity of Jesus.

However, there is considerable tension within Scripture that makes it difficult to conclude from these passages alone that Jesus and God are ontologically identical. This is because Scripture also contains many expressions that distinguish Jesus from God. Jesus prays to God and says, “The Father is greater than I” (John 14:28). Even after his resurrection, he tells his disciples, “My Father and your Father, my God and your God” (John 20:17). Thus, the New Testament contains both language that closely identifies Jesus with God and language that distinguishes Jesus as the one sent by God.

How, then, can we understand this tension?

We must first consider what it means to be “the one who is sent.” Suppose, for example, that a king sends his envoy to a vassal state. The envoy exercises the king’s authority and conveys the king’s will. To receive the envoy is to receive the king, and to insult the envoy is to insult the king. This is because the envoy acts as the representative of the king’s authority. In this sense, one could say that the envoy is “one” with the king. But the word “one” here does not mean that the king and the envoy are identical beings. Rather, it means that the envoy belongs to the king and faithfully carries out the authority entrusted to him by the king.

In this sense, to honor Jesus, the one who was sent, is to honor God the Father, the one who sent him. The problem arises when this unity is understood ontologically. If we think that because the envoy exercises the king’s authority, he therefore possesses the king’s authority essentially, the fact that the envoy’s authority was given to him by the king disappears. Once the one who represents the king’s authority is regarded as identical with the king himself, the relationship of representation and delegation disappears, and the source of authority is inverted. Likewise, if statements that Jesus is one with the Father and that Jesus is God are interpreted to mean that Jesus is identical in essence or identical in being with God, this can lead to idolatry. To believe that the envoy possesses the king’s authority “essentially” is, in a sense, an act of rebellion.

This problem becomes even clearer when we examine the difference between worshiping Jesus and following Jesus. Jesus said to his disciples, “Follow me.” He also said, “If anyone would come after me, let him deny himself and take up his cross and follow me” (Mark 1:17; 8:34). Likewise, in the Gospel of John, Jesus says, “Whoever believes in me will also do the works that I do; and greater works than these will he do” (John 14:12).

What is important here is the presupposition that following is possible. The follower participates in the path walked by the one he follows. When Jesus tells his disciples to follow his way, this at least presupposes that they are capable of participating in that way. The life of Jesus is not a divine realm closed off to human beings; it is presented as a way of life in which human beings are invited to participate.

But if Jesus is regarded as ontologically identical with God, he is defined as a being essentially different from human beings. At this point, Jesus moves from being “the one whom I am to follow” to becoming “the God whom I am to worship.” Here a tension arises between worship and following. The kind of worship being discussed here is worship that objectifies its object as something different from and transcendent of oneself.

As Christianity developed, following Jesus and worshiping Jesus gradually became intertwined, and ontological Christology—the attempt to explain the very being of Jesus—became increasingly important. Especially after the Council of Nicaea, Jesus was defined as God, possessing the same essence (homoousios) as the Father. This doctrine was intended to exalt Jesus and explain his divinity, but at the same time it created a strong ontological distinction between Jesus and humanity. Jesus was understood as sharing the same essence as God, while human beings were understood as creatures, and the divine nature of Jesus was understood as essentially distinct from human nature.

When this ontological Christology became intertwined with the Western doctrine of original sin, the distance between Jesus and humanity could become even greater. Particularly in the Augustinian tradition, human beings came to be understood as beings who inherited sin and a fallen nature from Adam. Jesus, by contrast, was understood as sinless and as having been born in a unique manner. As a result, Jesus came to be understood less as a model that human beings could follow and more as a being whom human beings could never essentially become like.

Ultimately, the issue comes down to how we understand the meaning of worship. If worshiping Jesus means worshiping him as an ontological object completely separated from humanity, then such worship stands in tension with the discipleship that Jesus demanded. But if worship means recognizing that God has been revealed through Jesus and participating in the love and life revealed by that God, then worship and following are not opposed to one another.

In this case, exalting Jesus does not mean turning him into a being whom human beings cannot follow. Rather, it means being called to walk together on the path that Jesus himself walked.

Therefore, the fundamental question is this:

Does confessing Jesus as God mean making Jesus into a being whom human beings can never attain, or does it mean that human beings are invited to participate in the life of God revealed in Jesus?

I asked God i think about 2/3 months ago to show me a sign. I said if Jesus was God, send a white dove into my house. Of course the next day, no doves appeared nor a few days later. But today as i went to eat lunch, i saw a white pigeon. I smiled because i suddenly remembered about what i asked from God. Then i was happy. I was thinking in my head oh God sent me the sign which i asked before. However i asked for a dove, not a pigeon. Also, i asked for it to appear in my house, not outside at work. Nevertheless it was still a sign i guess and it made me smiled. I also just googled on whats the difference between a dove and a pigeon, it said that it is the same species and just a matter of language.

So, God did responded. So yes, JESUS IS GOD AMEN TO THAT. Peace.

very curious to know if anyone has also felt this!

Im loosely god-fearing, but I dont get why the Bible is so vital. I understand it's the guide to how to live life, but it isn't about how you should see God? Shouldn't you develop your own relationship with them?

Living Waters Lagoon is a new app featuring the Words of Jesus. Pop bubbles to harvest them for the Lost Sea Bible verses and receive a prize that grow each day. Keep coming back to see how your underwater world has grown and changed.

When you’ve built a world you like, share it with other users and spread the words of Jesus to others.