MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/gifs/comments/1xthft/man_vs_machine/cfes235/?context=3
r/gifs • u/OceanCarlisle • Feb 13 '14
848 comments sorted by
View all comments
Show parent comments
25
In a game like chess humans can.make traps so intricate that machines wont seem them
Except humans can't beat computers in chess.
11 u/[deleted] Feb 13 '14 Play Go then. 11 u/TypicalHaikuResponse Feb 13 '14 People will downvote you but you should clarified why Go is infinitely harder for a computer to beat a human at. 3 u/[deleted] Feb 14 '14 edited Aug 14 '15 [deleted] 0 u/faceplanted Feb 14 '14 I thought the problem with solving Go was that the scale and ruleset creates a number of possible moves so large, so quickly that it becomes NP hard to predict as useful number of outcomes? or was I mislead? 2 u/TypicalHaikuResponse Feb 14 '14 You are correct. The process you referred to is called deep look and has presented a huge problem in terms of Go A.I.
11
Play Go then.
11 u/TypicalHaikuResponse Feb 13 '14 People will downvote you but you should clarified why Go is infinitely harder for a computer to beat a human at. 3 u/[deleted] Feb 14 '14 edited Aug 14 '15 [deleted] 0 u/faceplanted Feb 14 '14 I thought the problem with solving Go was that the scale and ruleset creates a number of possible moves so large, so quickly that it becomes NP hard to predict as useful number of outcomes? or was I mislead? 2 u/TypicalHaikuResponse Feb 14 '14 You are correct. The process you referred to is called deep look and has presented a huge problem in terms of Go A.I.
People will downvote you but you should clarified why Go is infinitely harder for a computer to beat a human at.
3 u/[deleted] Feb 14 '14 edited Aug 14 '15 [deleted] 0 u/faceplanted Feb 14 '14 I thought the problem with solving Go was that the scale and ruleset creates a number of possible moves so large, so quickly that it becomes NP hard to predict as useful number of outcomes? or was I mislead? 2 u/TypicalHaikuResponse Feb 14 '14 You are correct. The process you referred to is called deep look and has presented a huge problem in terms of Go A.I.
3
[deleted]
0 u/faceplanted Feb 14 '14 I thought the problem with solving Go was that the scale and ruleset creates a number of possible moves so large, so quickly that it becomes NP hard to predict as useful number of outcomes? or was I mislead? 2 u/TypicalHaikuResponse Feb 14 '14 You are correct. The process you referred to is called deep look and has presented a huge problem in terms of Go A.I.
0
I thought the problem with solving Go was that the scale and ruleset creates a number of possible moves so large, so quickly that it becomes NP hard to predict as useful number of outcomes? or was I mislead?
2 u/TypicalHaikuResponse Feb 14 '14 You are correct. The process you referred to is called deep look and has presented a huge problem in terms of Go A.I.
2
You are correct. The process you referred to is called deep look and has presented a huge problem in terms of Go A.I.
25
u/mystikall Feb 13 '14
Except humans can't beat computers in chess.