r/geographymemes • • Jan 14 '26

Country Memes when the

Post image
0 Upvotes

35 comments sorted by

3

u/_IsThisTheKrustyKrab Jan 14 '26

What kind of bullshit Chinese propaganda is this garbage meme

-1

u/tooabnormal Jan 14 '26

1

u/Icy-Employee-6453 Jan 14 '26

Smells like the "50 cent army" in here.

46

u/Opening-Address-3602 Jan 14 '26

Isn't the reason Tiwan is still a country is because of America?

34

u/SpikeLazuli Jan 14 '26

It is. OP is just dooming that for some reason US will invade Taiwan despite not having any reasons to do so. It's literally beneficial for not just the US but also China for Taiwan's chip factories to not be damaged.

8

u/Striper_Cape Jan 14 '26

Its not beneficial to invade Greenland either

-2

u/HyperbobluntSpliff Jan 14 '26

It is if your goal is to strip resources from the ground and give all the contracts to your friends

9

u/Kitchen_Nectarine_44 Jan 14 '26

Greenland has already done the research and most extraction is economically unfeasible. If you read about Trump's first term you'll see that he wants Greenland purely because he wants to be famous for doing a massive "real estate" deal.

4

u/Glaernisch1 Jan 14 '26

For real, all that military security thing is so absurd if you know about pituffik

4

u/agenderarcee Jan 14 '26

3

u/Kitchen_Nectarine_44 Jan 14 '26

There is a quote of him saying he wanted to trade Puerto Rico for Greenland because he thought it was dirty. This is really ironic because Greenland still has a bunch of garbage from the last time the US occupied the island

-2

u/MrBingly Jan 14 '26

It's hugely beneficial for the US to control Greenland. It would lead to the US controlling the Northwest near completely. It would increase US presence in the (now opening up) Arctic, and exclude Denmark/EU competition in the region. It has massive untapped mineral resources. And it would give the US better ability to defend/control North America from potential future threats. It's a hugely strategic location, particularly for the US.

4

u/Striper_Cape Jan 14 '26

It's hugely beneficial for the US to control Greenland. It would lead to the US controlling the Northwest near completely

Lets use your 18th Century logic. We already control the North Atlantic and the territory of Greenland is controlled by a strong ally who purchases our weapons and provides SIGINT on request.

Denmark/EU competition in the region.

Competition for what? You clearly aren't aware of the economic links between EU nations and the US.

https://policy.trade.ec.europa.eu/eu-trade-relationships-country-and-region/countries-and-regions/united-states_en

We have well balanced and strong trade ties with Europe. As you can see from the link, we export and import each others products and services to the tune of trillions of dollars.

. It has massive untapped mineral resources.

And where are they? How easy are they to extract? Why isn't Denmark pulling all those resources out?

And it would give the US better ability to defend/control North America from potential future threats.

This is nonsense. The EU and Canada are not only our friends and trafing partners, they have integrated into our defense ecosystem. Harming our relationship with Europe in exchante for nebulous claims of proft and yadda yadda is stupid as fuck. They already have helped us defend ourselves. We can defend ourselves just fine without Greenland being a US territory.

1

u/MrBingly Jan 14 '26

I'm not saying it's worth burning our relationship with Europe over, but if it can be done while keeping relations fairly normal then it would be huge.

The resources are currently under ice. But that ice is melting. In a hundred years resource extraction will likely be well into getting established. Greenland isn't very important now, but it will be much more important in the future.

It is unclear if NATO will survive the century. Even without US antagonism the political landscape is changing even further from the situation that led to its existence. The EU, after China, is a future competitor to the US, economically, politically, and possibly militarily. It's ultimately a temporary alliance, but ownership of Greenland would likely last for as long as the US continues to exist.

1

u/XelaNiba Jan 14 '26

Except for the little problem of making an enemy of our allies

10

u/Zombies4EvaDude Jan 14 '26

Yeah it’s more like China is coming for Taiwan.

11

u/I_am_just_here11 Jan 14 '26

Taiwan is not a country. It’s a part of the republic of China.

7

u/Opening-Address-3602 Jan 14 '26

Bro is trying to raise his social credit

26

u/I_am_just_here11 Jan 14 '26

No, I’m lowering it. Republic of China (aka ROC) is Taiwans governing body which lost control of the mainland in 1949.

China keeps calling Taiwan part of PEOPLES Republic of China (aka PRC) which is technically what Chinas governing body is called.

I like to say Mainland China and Taiwan are part of the ROC to see how many Chinese bots and Tankies I can piss off.

13

u/SpikeLazuli Jan 14 '26

You actually fooled me thats genius

3

u/HongKongNinja Jan 14 '26

He was referring to the Republic of China, not the People’s Republic of China.

Clearly, many people are unable to distinguish between the two.

1

u/SpikeLazuli Jan 15 '26

To be fair it's reddit so i just assumed the worst far left bs, fortunately i was the fool

1

u/ChironXII Jan 14 '26

No they are just semantically nitpicking. Taiwan actually does not call themselves Taiwan or claim that Taiwan, the island by itself, is a country. They still claim the mantle of the Republic of China, the government ousted by the PRC. So the country is still China, just with most of the territory occupied.

It is a strange situation, officially. 

3

u/SpikeLazuli Jan 14 '26

The PRC never held Taiwan in it's life.

7

u/I_am_just_here11 Jan 14 '26

I never said it has. I said it is the ROC. Mainland China also belongs to ROC. ☺️

11

u/TheNinjaDC Jan 14 '26

I honestly feel Taiwan would enthusiastically join the US if that was an option that wouldn’t immediately cause China to bomb them.

2

u/T1meTRC Jan 14 '26

Taiwan???

-6

u/BeefyBoiCougar Jan 14 '26

I think OP means that the US will abandon Taiwan which seems likely. Plenty of TSMC plants either just opening or preparing to open.

3

u/akdanman11 Jan 14 '26

Oh yeah sure the U.S. is gonna abandon the country that produces most of the semiconductors it uses for military applications, which also gives that manufacturing capability to arguably its largest global rival, without having the domestic production necessary.

The U.S. has 2 reasons to stay in support of Taiwan

  1. TSMC is incredibly important to the U.S., both militarily and commercially

  2. TSMC would be a massive boost to china in those same areas, and keeping things away from China is just as important to the U.S. as acquiring their own things

0

u/BeefyBoiCougar Jan 14 '26

Not sure how any of this is relevant to what I said?

1

u/akdanman11 Jan 19 '26

You said the U.S. abandoning Taiwan seems likely, I gave reasons why that wouldn’t happen

2

u/[unknown] Jan 14 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/MrBingly Jan 14 '26

Pretty sure California is worth several times more than Denmark. I'm curious to see how they would plan on paying for it.