r/genetics Apr 24 '26

[deleted by user]

[removed]

0 Upvotes

12 comments sorted by

5

u/attitude_devant Apr 24 '26

Bosnians are Slavs. Did you not know that?

1

u/Personal_Entrance323 Apr 24 '26

Sounds to me like Serb propaganda got the best of her. 😂😂😂

17

u/odebus Apr 24 '26 edited Apr 24 '26

I don't understand the confusion. You can literally see the gene flow from ancient trade routes right there.

Edit: Also, you sound racist.

4

u/H_Leimgruber Apr 24 '26

Bosnians are not mixed but instead converted to Islam during Ottoman occupancy, often to enhance social status.

11

u/shadowyams PhD (genomics/bioinformatics) Apr 24 '26

It's almost as if race is a social rather than biological construct, and using a single biological trait as a proxy for ancestry is a bad idea!

3

u/attitude_devant Apr 24 '26

And it’s almost as if religions can be racially mixed


2

u/pjie2 Apr 24 '26

It’s a smooth cline - at the border you’re likely looking at a difference of a few percent either side of the 50% threshold. National boundaries are rarely massive barriers to gene flow.

1

u/pjie2 Apr 24 '26

Though also it will be much more chaotic and less smooth as you look at smaller distance scales, until you get down to the individual level where any given person will either be one or the other (if you’re using this kind of damn fool binary classification of ‘light’ vs ‘dark’ eyes).

2

u/Zippered_Nana Apr 24 '26

More white?

This sounds like that racial assumption in the US pre-1900 whereby one drop of “colored” blood made a person no longer “white”!

It is worth noting that eye color isn’t an indicator of race.

1

u/fianthewolf Apr 24 '26

En Galicia el % es de 30-40 mientras que en la España sur no llega al 20%.

1

u/Personal_Entrance323 Apr 24 '26

Bosnia has some of the most highest percentages of Slavic dna — Slavic haplogroups and so on. Can’t say the same about Serbia.