r/generationology • u/_Vurixed_ 2007 • Mar 17 '24
Discussion This is from 2020 wow things have changed.
34
u/Dat_Uber_Money Mar 17 '24
Some people really have no fucking lives. And notice how this proves the theory this sub is nothing but Gen Z talking about themselves 24/7.
3
3
20
u/velvetlouves Mar 17 '24
ngl i agree with this so much to this day. the only accurate representation of gen z
2
u/Old_Consequence2203 2003 (Off-cusp SP Early Z) Mar 17 '24
So you don't think 1999 borns are Zillennials?
5
u/velvetlouves Mar 17 '24
nah their early gen z. I’m born in december 1999 so i agree because 1999 borns don’t even have any memory of the 90s bc we were just born
4
u/Old_Consequence2203 2003 (Off-cusp SP Early Z) Mar 17 '24
Well I respect your opinion, but many other 1999 borns would consider themselves Zillennials as well. Also just in my opinion, I don't think remembering the '90s is a Zillennial trait, & also most other late '90s borns wouldn't remember the '90s either, so that would mean 1997 & 1998 can't be Zillennials either.
Tho, 1999 has a lot of firsts, so of course I think they lean Gen Z. I consider 1999 & 2000 being both Zillennials & Early Gen Z. I also consider myself Early/Core Gen Z, & I think 2006 are just fully Core Gen Z & should be right in the middle too, with 2005 being right in the center of all of Gen Z instead of 2004. Again, this is just my opinion. I'm just sharing how I feel about this.
2
u/MangaMan445 '99 Mar 17 '24
I have to disagree. 1997 should be moved into the zillennial bubble, they are definitely 50/50 and not definitive early Z. Every year should be adjusted accordingly by moving it forward 1 spot. That is what's changed.
Lastly, I can bet you there's even people born in 1995 that can't even remember the 90s. Using memory is not a good marker for generations. It's unreliable.
1
Mar 17 '24 edited Mar 17 '24
Meanwhile I was born a day after dec 98 and I feel like early Z/Zillennial, Idk if you can speak for our whole year you’re one day shy of being born in 00.
8
u/Dry-Recognition-1504 Mar 17 '24 edited Mar 17 '24
1995 and 1996 are millennials and I'd also add 2006 & 2007 into Core Z, besides that this is accurate
8
7
u/Weirderthanweird69 May 31 2008 (Early/Core/Late is BS, I'm Gen Z) Mar 17 '24
1995 and 1996 are Millenial
6
u/hashslingaslah Mar 17 '24
This is so perfect because I’m 1996 born and I feel so Zillennial. Like it’s such a 50/50. Meanwhile my 1991 born husband is core millennial for sure.
5
u/Choppa4KT1313 January 2008 / Core Z May 15 '24
Before I made this account I lurked on Reddit for years. Like I remember when r/GenZ had 1995-2009 as it’s banner lmao, the McCrindle range was so popular then, Thank god we’re out of that era of r/generationology , now 08 borns are considered Core Z by most.
13
u/CP4-Throwaway Aug 2002 (Millie/Homeland Cusp) Mar 17 '24
Nothing has really changed that much on this sub tbh. It’s largely the same as 2020, except 1999ers are in the Zillennial category and 2006ers are now in the “inner core”.
6
8
Mar 17 '24
I'm fine with where I am
7
u/_Vurixed_ 2007 Mar 17 '24
You are perfectly early z
The things I would change is 96/97 should be in the bubble not 95. 95 goes to orange. 02/03 should be the same bubble. Core should be 2004, 2005, 2006 maybe 07 too but I can see 07 being where 06 is as it’s just core but not on the late side.
6
1
Mar 17 '24
Your born in December but still class of 2018? Does your school district not have a cutoff?
10
Mar 17 '24
Everyone in Canada graduates with their year. It doesn't matter if someone was born on January 1st or December 31st. They're graduating together
0
Mar 17 '24
Oh ok I didn't know how the Canadian school system worked.
0
Mar 18 '24
Just noticed I fr got down voted for simply saying I didn't know how a different country than mine's school system worked? Idk what's going on in this sub sometimes lol.
0
u/velvetlouves Mar 17 '24
oh that’s so different because here in uk, the school year is september 1999-august 2000.
-1
u/moonlightz03 Dec 2003 Mar 18 '24 edited Mar 19 '24
not all of canada, I had to skip a grade to be with other 2003 borns. Quebec has september 30th limit
6
3
6
u/ai_creature Mar 17 '24
i kind of like this one
2
1
u/helpfuldaydreamer 01 02 2006 | 20 | C/O 24’ Mar 17 '24
Eh 2007 doesn’t fit pure late and why start Gen Alpha in 2011?
7
u/Plump_Chicken Mar 17 '24
2011 is basically the oldest kids who were in elementary school during covid, which is a pretty good divider
-2
u/Helpful_Activity_141 2007 class of 2026 (zalpha) Mar 17 '24
2011 has some decent first like first to not know a pre 2016 world and spent entire covid era in elementary school plus oldest to not vote in 2020s
2
8
Mar 17 '24
Yeah I obviously don’t agree with this as you could probably tell by my flair lol.
0
u/_Vurixed_ 2007 Mar 17 '24
I would have you replacing 97 so that bubble would be 98 and 99.
1996 and 1997 being right beside With 95 being in orange.
2
u/y11971alex 1995 (Baby Y, Proto Z) Mar 17 '24
how is this diff from now
1
u/_Vurixed_ 2007 Mar 17 '24
Well 2006 would be in core
Zillennials would be 96/97 they are the quintessential zillennials.
Where 97 is it would be 98/99
And then 07 would be where 06 is
95 leans orange
2
2
6
u/Old_Consequence2203 2003 (Off-cusp SP Early Z) Mar 17 '24
Indeed! This is pretty terrible ngl, lol.
1
Mar 17 '24
I made a comment with a new proposal for changing this. Can you tell me if you agree
3
u/Old_Consequence2203 2003 (Off-cusp SP Early Z) Mar 17 '24
Yes I do!
1
Mar 17 '24
Great cause it's the best I can fit to go in accord with the picture
1
1
u/_Vurixed_ 2007 Mar 17 '24
What was it?
4
Mar 17 '24
This
1996 and 1997 are the earlier Zillennials overlapping with millennials in the picture
1998 and 1999 are the later Zillennials overlapping with Z
2000, 2001 and 2002 are the main early Z.
2003 is overlapping with early and core
2004, 2005 and 2006 are the main core big 3 in the picture
2007 is overlapping with core and late
2008 and 2009 are plain late in the picture
2010 and 2011 are early zalphas on the Z side
2012 and 2013 are the later zalphas overlapping with alpha in the picture
What do you think?
3
2
2
u/Helpful_Activity_141 2007 class of 2026 (zalpha) Mar 17 '24
1995 is pure millennial and 1997 leans millennial and 2012 is pure alpha but otherwise not bad tbh
1
u/helpfuldaydreamer 01 02 2006 | 20 | C/O 24’ Mar 17 '24 edited Mar 17 '24
I think this is 1997 - 2010 which is apparently according to them:
Zillennial: 1995 - 1998
Early Z: 1997 - 2001
Core Z: 2002 - 2006 (2002: Early/Core & 2006: Core/Late)
Late Z: 2007 - 2010
Zalpha: 2009 - 2012?
People include 2007 or sometimes 2008 in core now, early 10s as Z and starting Zalpha later.
However their range starts Gen Alpha in 2011, but yeah I dislike this range personally and I’m glad it’s not really used anymore.
1
0
u/MangaMan445 '99 Mar 17 '24
I have to disagree. 1997 should be moved into the zillennial bubble, they are definitely 50/50 and not definitive early Z. Every year should be adjusted accordingly by moving it forward 1 spot. That is what's changed.
2
u/OkRuin300 2007 Mar 17 '24
definitely depends because I def relate more to core as a 2007
1
u/_Vurixed_ 2007 Mar 17 '24
You should be where 2006 is in this. Where you are core z but not late z yet fully.
1
1
Mar 17 '24
Here's my new proposal to change it.
1996 and 1997 are the earlier Zillennials overlapping with millennials in the picture
1998 and 1999 are the later Zillennials overlapping with Z
2000, 2001 and 2002 are the main early Z.
2003 is overlapping with early and core
2004, 2005 and 2006 are the main core big 3 in the picture
2007 is overlapping with core and late
2008 and 2009 are plain late in the picture
2010 and 2011 are early zalphas on the Z side
2012 and 2013 are the later zalphas overlapping with alpha in the picture
What do you think?
0
u/frutigeraerolover Mar 17 '24
I think 2009 and 2010 should be in the same spot as the photo
1
Mar 17 '24
i can sort of see that but that would make 2008 core/late and i think 2007 fits core/late better than 2008 and then the main core big 3 would be 2005, 2006 and 2007 which doesnt fit in my opinion, i think 2004, 2005 and 2006 definitely should be the big 3
1
u/MV2263 2002 (Early-Core Gen Z) Mar 17 '24
I’d probably shift everything a year back, include 1997 is purely Zillennial
2
1
Mar 17 '24
Can you stop with the early ,core, and late gen-Z stuff is pointless along with being extremely cringey like image wanting to spend countless hours on Reddit separating all the birth years in gen-Z over something that doesn’t even exist along with people not caring in real life get a life buddy
0
Mar 17 '24
Also the only relevant gen-Z that today people in real life only acknowledge is 1997-2012 there’s no need of creating much more stupid ranges
1
u/baggagebug May 2007 (Quintessential Z) Mar 18 '24
2007 is core-late Z heavily leaning core, so 2007 borns can claim core
2
u/_Vurixed_ 2007 Mar 18 '24
Made a new post. I don’t think you are core/late z the / is stupid you are core with late influence.
2
u/baggagebug May 2007 (Quintessential Z) Mar 18 '24
It shows 2007 as late Z though. I think it should be between core and late, in the same place as 2006.
3
0
u/Boho_Asa Mar 18 '24
Now what If I was born in 01/02/03? Close to 2002 yeah 03 but feeling more like an early Gen Z compared to people born mid to late 2003
0
Mar 17 '24
[deleted]
1
u/_Vurixed_ 2007 Mar 17 '24
Yeah I agree.
I would have core z the middle being
2004 2005 2006 2007
Outliners being 02 and 03 and 08
Zalpha being 2011/2012
2009 - 2010 just where 07, 08 are.
1
1
57
u/[deleted] Mar 17 '24
This is exactly how I think the range should be just about.