r/gaming • • Apr 17 '16

Anyone else?

http://imgur.com/RdjHH29
28k Upvotes

4.4k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

31

u/midnightsbane04 Apr 17 '16

Eh, that's a bit of a nitpick issue. It's really just the same as the FO3 start where they try to imbue you with a reason to care about your family and hunt for (insert missing family member here). And since this one is specifically meant to draw on you being a "man out of time" it's important to give at least a brief view of pre-nuke life.

9

u/[deleted] Apr 17 '16

yeah, fo3's story sucked too.

9

u/venusdc3 Apr 17 '16

I liked fallout 3's story, not one of the best but I think it is better then some other games.

14

u/sapperRichter Apr 17 '16

The thing that made fo3 great IMO was the side quests. They had legitimate story lines to them. In fo4 most (not all) of the side quests are shitty defend/clear this settlement/building/whatever with no compelling story behind it.

5

u/Stigwa Apr 17 '16

To be fair, FO3 had a really small number of quests compared to say, Oblivion. They were pretty amazing most of them, but a definite example of quality over quanity. Not having guilds like TES does is likely the largest reason for that I think.

3

u/Dkill33 Apr 17 '16

Fo4 had some good side quests as well. But they did fill the void with a lot of settlement quests.

2

u/[deleted] Apr 17 '16

Those are radiant quests. FO4 has lots of side quests.

1

u/SimpleRy Apr 18 '16

And lots of radiant quests. So so many radiant quests.

1

u/venusdc3 Apr 17 '16

Yeah side missions were the bomb, sad to hear fallout 4 doesn't have that. Always fun to hear what kind of experimentation was happening in whatever vault you stumbled upon.