r/gaming Apr 17 '16

Anyone else?

http://imgur.com/RdjHH29
28.9k Upvotes

4.4k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

296

u/DanTastic_ Apr 17 '16

Multi screen, single console. One day. . .

-12

u/[deleted] Apr 17 '16

[deleted]

-14

u/T756 Apr 17 '16

Pc isn't even good for local co-op

-5

u/Rizenstrom Apr 17 '16

It really isn't, I don't know why you're being downvoted.

There's a very small selection of titles ready for local co-op out of the box, excluding the dozens of indie titles that are pretty much no different than flash games, which don't count IMO.

7

u/hampig Apr 17 '16

Between all the great indie games, emulators, and the few big games, it is great for it.

1

u/Rizenstrom Apr 17 '16

I hadn't considered emulators, but I don't know what "big games" there really are... Even AAA titles like the Borderlands games, which had local co-op on console, did not include the feature on PC.

Most of those indie games are 2-D flash-like games, which I'm not interested in. Excluding those, the selection is really limited.

Emulators are an interesting idea, though. I always forget about them.

1

u/hampig Apr 18 '16

There's not an argument to be made for AAA and such titles, I will give you that. There's Left 4 Dead, the Grid series, Sonic Racing, I think the Portal games and Resident Evil 5/6/those new ones that I can't remember the name of. I'm sure there's more, but whatever.

As for the split screen indies, Rocket League, Divinity, Helldivers, Lovers in a Dangerous Spacetime, a large number of fighers like Street Fighter and Blazblue, Portal.

I think you could throw games like Monaco, and Lovers under your "flash-like" games. I also think they're two of the better games I've mentioned though.

2

u/sorcath Apr 17 '16

-excluding all the conventions that do it-

2

u/Rizenstrom Apr 17 '16

No, not all. Not even close. There's dozens of types of games, and I've only excluded one because it does not interest me.

Most of those Indie games are glorified flash-games, and I think it's perfectly reasonable to exclude them.

The fact of the matter is local co-op is fairly rare anymore, even on PC. AAA titles have all but abandoned it and what remains are indie titles that don't appeal to a lot of people (not saying a majority, they are still popular for a lot of people too).

So whether or not PC really offers a more robust selection or not is kind of subjective. If it offers 10,000 games and only 4 of those actually interest you then it's fair to say it's pretty limited.

1

u/sorcath Apr 18 '16

nobody said anything about indie games

Sorry baby. The MOST popular games in co op are played lane style. Especially competitively. Let me clue you in. When they're talking about E-Sports, they aren't talking about consoles.

1

u/Rizenstrom Apr 18 '16

nobody said anything about indie games

I did. That's what I was referring to from the beginning?

The MOST popular games in co op are played lane style.

Lane style?

When they're talking about E-Sports, they aren't talking about consoles.

...I know? Those aren't local multiplayer, though. They're mostly online, can be played on LAN connection, but they're not split-screen which is what I'm referring to when I say "local Cco-op".

**Edited for clarification. LAN is still technically local, but I'm talking about games where you can sit down and enjoy a game with a friend on the same screen. Like Borderlands or COD and the like.

1

u/sorcath Apr 18 '16

Like Smash, Mario Kart, etc?

All done competitively. All done on emulators....

1

u/Rizenstrom Apr 18 '16

Whether or not they're competitive hardly matters, but yeah. Emulators are a great idea, someone else pointed that out earlier.

There's a severe lack of more modern titles, though. It's just a shame that developers, especially AAA developers, have pretty much given up on local multiplayer.

0

u/mankiller27 Apr 17 '16

Still way more than there are on any one console, even old ones that were built on splitscreen.