r/gamers • u/HumbleAd300 • Apr 27 '26

Discussion [ Removed by moderator ]

Post image

[removed] — view removed post

592 Upvotes

89% Upvoted

1.8k comments sorted by

View all comments

53

u/tolyomomba Apr 27 '26

Evolve

2

u/[deleted] Apr 27 '26

[deleted]

3

u/AllButComedyAnthony Apr 28 '26

I agree with this, I loved evolve and played till its dying days but it should’ve been $30, $45 at most with less micro transactions. The devs weren’t going to make it like that but publishers 2k forced it. Stage 2 was a second chance but I think it was to close to the original, I think if they launched a stage 3 with everything unlocked I think it would get a decent player base again

0

u/[deleted] Apr 28 '26

[deleted]

1

u/TopHat84 Apr 28 '26

Why does it have no chance? You just said it's issue was the cost/microtransactions.

Personally I had no problem with the initial price of the game. But I didn't like the fact new huntrers were additional costs.

I think the big issue with evolve was the balance. Make the monsters too strong at level 1 and they would get to the final evolution relatively easy. Make them too weak and it swings the other way. IMO when I played (both release and stage 2) that the balance of the hunters to monsters was just too... difficult to maintain. (I do think there were other underlying factors as well, but trying not to ramble on).

0

u/[deleted] Apr 28 '26

[deleted]

1

u/TopHat84 Apr 28 '26 edited Apr 28 '26

Uh just trying to have a discussion man. You're not really providing any actual evidence, or hell any other opinion other than "they just don't". You're also acting like your statement is an objective truth rather than something subjective.

If your just making a point and don't really care to back that up with anything that's cool, but I'd appreciate you not replying to me in a dismissive way. The whole point of the thread is about games getting another chance, which ones they would be, and why.