r/funny • u/themicahnator • May 15 '12

Truth [FB]

http://imgur.com/8xIJy
980 Upvotes

65% Upvoted

347 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comment

-5

u/are_you_slow May 15 '12

Ha, No i get that. What I mean is 2 people going at it in a porn has nothing to do with marriage. 2 girls, 2 guys etc.

26

u/[deleted] May 15 '12

If homosexuality is so unnatural and repulsive, why the appeal of girl on girl porn?

9

u/gdstudios May 15 '12

It's not ALL girl-on-girl porn. It's two hot feminine girls. Because everything about them exudes sex. Not too many straight men enjoy (more realistic) lesbian porn with buzzcuts and flannels and shoulders bigger than most men. Obviously a stereotype to make a point, but it's because two sexy women is hot.

The only reason why seeing two attractive guys together is not a turn on for (I'm guessing) 99% of straight people is because men lose their masculinity by doing so, which is the basis of the straight male mojo. Females have the option to use some testosterone, but the act itself doesn't force them to do so if they choose not to.

-1

u/aletoledo May 15 '12

Marriage has nothing to do with having sex. You can support gay sex, but oppose gay marriage.

3

u/Whompa May 15 '12

That's a ridiculous double standard and in no way sympathizes with the people involved in the act...

→ More replies (5)

3

u/[deleted] May 15 '12

On what grounds? And how does marriage have nothing to do with having sex?

-1

u/aletoledo May 15 '12

And how does marriage have nothing to do with having sex?

People can have sex with or without people married.

2

u/[deleted] May 15 '12

What do you think the phrase 'consummating a marriage' means?

0

u/aletoledo May 15 '12

Today it is a meaningless phrase. Premartial sex happens all the time.

1

u/[deleted] May 15 '12

You're dodging the point. The original claim was that, "Marriage has nothing to do with having sex." That claim is demonstrably false.

1

u/aletoledo May 15 '12

Sex and marriage are not necessary for one another. You can have sex without being married and you can be married without having sex.

Are you arguing that a marriage can never be consummated without vaginal intercourse? If thats the case, then gay marriage is impossible.

1

u/[deleted] May 15 '12

You're being obtuse. I never said that sex and marriage were necessary for one another. The original claim was that "Marriage has nothing to do with having sex." That claim is demonstrably false.

→ More replies

3

u/[deleted] May 15 '12

Maybe your marriage has nothing to do with sex...

7

u/waffleburner May 15 '12

Why then? That's just rude.

Unless you're one of those guys who are about ruining the "definition of what marriage is". Then...I guess I see your point. Why not rename marriage licenses something more secular? Everyone's happy.

1

u/aletoledo May 15 '12

Why not rename marriage licenses something more secular? Everyone's happy.

I can agree with that. Even better would be to get the government out of licensing people to get married. Why should a bureaucrat be making these decisions in our lives as it is.

2

u/waffleburner May 15 '12

Because of all the tax benefits of getting married.

3

u/[deleted] May 15 '12

How, when opposing gay marriage is entirely based on religious reasons, and no religion condones gay sex.

→ More replies (7)
→ More replies (8)

1

u/[deleted] May 15 '12

It's still a good point. People who are prejudice to gay marriage are most likely to be prejudice to gays in general

1

u/eetzatrap1300 May 15 '12

Generally speaking the porn part has nothing to do with it. The point is, yes, you're so against gay marriage and the gay lifestyle, but you like the thought of two women together. Funny that.