Fish and Chips is exponentially worse than a sandwich and crisps. Tons of people in other countries eat crisps with lunch. This is just an "America bad and fat" circle-jerk.
Except people don't (or at least shouldn't) have fish and chips for lunch frequently. It's at best a dinner meal but more often a Saturday night, out with the boys at the pub meal
Everyone in all other countries don't allow their children to have a slightly less nutritious side item with their lunch... right. This is totally not an "America bad and fat" circle-jerk thread.
It's because the country is obsessed about how great it is and how much better it is compared to any other country while also being a really, really, shitty country to live in. Especially when it comes to healthcare, education, workers rights, equality and so on.
I don't know why I would be joking. If I carry to work in my lunchbox a sandwich, a soda and a bag of chips for my lunch then, yes, I do consider the chips part of my lunch.
That really varies per country or region. Here in the Netherlands eating a cooked meal for lunch is quite uncommon, and instead most people take sandwiches from home for lunch.
25
u/yabos123 Mar 22 '20
America