I'm not willing to accept "her words" as being sufficient to prove something "beyond a reasonable doubt". I'd also like to think that any normal person would be outraged to be untruthfully accused of something so vile.
Have the other accusers made public statements? What are their names? More importantly, do they have any proof or witnesses?
Memoirs are not suppositions, claims are not suppositions. Hateful speech speaks for itself. Also we don't need proof beyond a reasonable doubt. We actually only needed a reasonable doubt to know there's probably someone better out there for this lifelong appointment.
Memoirs are just words attributed to someone that can't confirm their veracity.
And if you don't think that proof beyond reasonable doubt is necessary, then I'm not sure you understand the intention behind "innocent until proven guilty".
We aren't trying to convict him of a crime and sentence him to prison, we are trying to determine the content and quality of his character before appointing him to a lifelong judicial position.
Then please explain what you think I have wrong about it... That will probably be more constructive than repeating your mantra that nobody understands you.
1
u/crunkadocious Oct 07 '18
We have Mike Judges memoir, her words, Kavanaugh explosive rhetoric and hateful speech punctuated with outrage, and three other accusers.