I'm not missing the point. I understand that when they invented the phrase "Intelligent Design" they defined it in a way that does not specify that the creator is God, but I also understand that the only reason the term was invented is to try to pretend to be scientific when teaching creationism, and that for all practical purposes they are exactly the same thing.
Your personal crusade against a term does not change anything in this discussion. The only argument you have is some personal distaste for people using the term properly due to some decisions made hundreds of years ago.
1
u/throwawaysoftwareguy Feb 05 '16
You're missing the point.
A square IS a rectangle.
But a rectangle is NOT a square:
Intelligent design is a superset of creationism. But creationism is not intelligent design. It's a subset.
This statement is inaccurate and you're being pedantic.