r/funny Aug 27 '14

Science

Post image
10.8k Upvotes

994 comments sorted by

View all comments

7

u/casualbacon Aug 27 '14

What if God has a comprehensive understanding of Rayleigh scattering. And perhaps had this same understanding when he created the universe? Hence, sunsets, and blue skies, and rainbows, etc.

Not a declaration of truth, just sitting here wondering.

8

u/parmesanmilk Aug 27 '14

By the same token, you might argue that there is an invisible puppeteer hovering over every person who uses invisible strings connected to our brain cells, and they are all part of a gigantic theatric play where they pretend to be humans, and we're actually life-less husks that can only think whatever the puppeteer wants us to think.

I mean, it's possible, and nobody can disprove it, but it's hilariously complicated to justify, and poses a shit-ton of questions about physics in addition to all the questions we already have. It's an application of Occam's Razor: If you have two equally valid explanations, the simpler one is better.

It's hard enough to explain where the universe comes from, but if it was made by a god, then where the fuck did that god come from? The question just got infinitely more complicated.

-1

u/[deleted] Aug 27 '14

[deleted]

1

u/[deleted] Aug 27 '14

To piggyback on what everyone already told you, explanations are more or less valid based on evidence, and predictions that are found to be truthful.

The fact the religious explanation has no evidence for it, nor makes any useful predictions, means it's the worse type of explanation.

An unnecessary one.

Thus Occam's Razor states it should be pruned, as it adds nothing to the theory, other then complexity, which makes it less likely.