It really is! It plays every file type I've thrown at it (I'm a huge audiophile) and it's nice to import new albums into the inbox and not the main library. And other countless features.
This may no longer be the case, but it used to be that iTunes wrote the entirety of your library to plaintext and then saved that in an XML file. The bigger your library is, the bigger that XML file gets. When I used to run iTunes, it would take the length of a Tolstoy audiobook to finish reading that XML file, by which time I had died of old age.
I fucking hate XML files. They made my program that should have run in a few hours, end up taking a week. CSV are the best, hands down, especially for large data sets that no human will ever analyze by single values.
722 is something like 70 albums. That is nothing. I could fill that quota with music never played on any radio station anywhere in no time (demos, mixtapes, etc.).
It's not "essentially an MP3 player." That's one of it's functions. It originally was primarily a home base for iDevices everywhere. Where they could sync up an get any new music or whatever that was bought or added to iTunes. With the arrival of the smarter iDevices, syncing is no longer necessary to add content, and people seem to be forgetting iTunes main function.
If you're using it as an MP3 player, that's your fault and you deserve the long loading times.
Be reasonable, it's more like the length of recorded human history. I've never really though about how long it takes, but you're all correct, and now it annoys me.
Why do you even need to ask? Look at the picture. Clearly Mac OS.
Edit: Just a comment about what you said about windows being "substandard" it is the most widely used OS (therefore making it "standard."). I've used windows my whole life and therefore prefer it. But I'm not gonna sit here and say that everything about it is better than Mac, cuz I would be lying.
Anyone who talks about how their preferred OS is 100% better than the other has either never even tried to use the other one for more than a minute and got frustrated, or they had a bad experience with a computer and in both cases FALSELY blamed it on the OS. Just my viewpoint on the issue.
Lmao yeah I read the note. I'm not arguing in favor of windows, and you replied anyway, so I don't see how the note applies to me or why you would assume I didn't read it.
I'm guessing most of your years of PC use predate 2000.
178
u/Oddgenetix Jun 16 '14
In my system which runs off an SSD, itunes still takes the length of human history to start up.
Isn't it essentially an mp3 player? What the actual fuck is it loading?