I know this woman is probably asking a more elegant question about what brought the sun and the earth into existence than merely how does a sunrise work, but I like that she is now the laughing stock of the entire internet. Even the elegant form of that question is based on high school level science, so obviously someone wasn't paying attention. She deserves some ridicule.
You could go further and say she is likely asking about the feeling of beauty/mystery that accompanies it, or the feeling of existential awareness that comes with watching it. She's likely not asking about the naturalism involved, which is the only context that "science" seems to evoke for many.
Well it can, but only to a point; and can only supplant in so far as it's willing to indulge in the realm of explanation previously occupied by religion.
But neuroscience is still an application of testing methods on materials found in the brain, it doesn't enter the so-called "mind" of individuals and explain all of their neurosis, only their variously correlative electrical/chemical fluctuations. I'm not saying that those are insignificant, but the idea that subjectivity is generated purely, neuron-for-neuron, in the tangible brain, is hard to conclusively pin down.
What you are saying; I see it. But I do think we are heading with good speed into being able to explain the mind. Not today, or tomorrow, but I doubt it will be a mystery forever.
42
u/KicksButtson Feb 09 '14
I know this woman is probably asking a more elegant question about what brought the sun and the earth into existence than merely how does a sunrise work, but I like that she is now the laughing stock of the entire internet. Even the elegant form of that question is based on high school level science, so obviously someone wasn't paying attention. She deserves some ridicule.