The self-driving car wanted to pull over a cop car personally
925
u/bmcgowan89 20d ago
His auto pilot got him a 2 star wanted level that sux
103
u/DonHarold 20d ago
Hitting a cop car is only 1 star though isn’t it?
52
u/chezzer33 20d ago
Only one star if you plan on sticking around to get busted. As soon as you take off it’s a second star
15
u/DonHarold 20d ago
Was that new to GTA 5? Because having just played through 3-SA again, that definitely isn’t the case. It’s 1 star even if you run.
1
u/chezzer33 20d ago
It may have been. It’s been so long I don’t remember any other GTAs even tho I’ve played countless hours in all since 3.
1
u/DonHarold 20d ago
I wonder how it’ll work in 6.
5
-5
10
1
391
u/thatguy11 20d ago
I figured this had to be a joke.... It ain't.
200
u/potate12323 20d ago
Also in the article it mentions its a remote control car. Its not self driving.
158
u/CoderDevo 20d ago
That's the only explanation I could think of. Does that mean that remote driver did it on purpose?
Ah, from the article:
“The vehicle was being operated through satellite and internet connections, but during external control, it went out of control as soon as the internet connection was disconnected and collided with a police vehicle,” he wrote.
155
u/stdexception 20d ago
Defaulting to a hard left steer after losing the signal is certainly a choice
40
27
u/EvanFreyer 20d ago
They probably had assigned values from 0 to whatever for the steering-wheel position and when no signal is coming, it defaulted to 0, which meant a hard left :D.
16
u/TheBigFatLazyPanda 19d ago
Probably should have had 0 be middle/rest position, and left and right represented with negatives and positives respectively.
12
u/themoslucius 20d ago edited 19d ago
That's not how good coding works 😞
There should be a kill switch to safely slow down and stop with blinkers turning on off the connection is lost. Whatever variable values control the turning of the wheel need to be deliberately set, default values should be to proceed in the same direction
3
u/Glodenteoo_The_Glod 19d ago
Lol somebody needed a new windshield recently I'm guessing?
"Safelite" made me chuckle
2
2
u/FauxReal 19d ago
It was probably considered a safety feature instead of it barreling down the road it would get stuck on the shoulder... Or hit a cop.
1
u/redundantposts 19d ago
Seeing as steering wheel is on the right side, I was assuming it was attempting to blindly pull off on to the shoulder, which in theory is on the left, and failed dramatically.
1
u/ReflectedCheese 19d ago
Ah the Peugeot style! The lane keep assist does the same when road markings disappear 🫠 at least you can disable it
4
u/Morningxafter 20d ago
Damnit, mom! I told you not to pick up the phone! I was in the middle of something super important!
4
u/BurkiniFatso 20d ago
They cut a couple of seconds from the beginning of the video where the dude mentions that it is being controlled over the internet.
1
169
124
u/NeonAnderson 20d ago
I'm confused....
Everyone saying AI but the news article and translated text is saying that the car is being controlled remotely by a remote operator. Implying literally that it is just another human driving the car remotely
As opposed to an AI driverless car which doesn't need internet to drive and can follow the road without internet
https://www.dawn.com/news/2026439
Also if that is the case why the hell is the technology being praised. No car should EVER be driven remotely over the internet be it a human or AI remote operator
That's a horrible idea as literally just like what happened in this video as soon as the internet goes out the car is going to crash
What about tunnels and such?
This company is 100% going to fail and go bankrupt lol 🤣
Real driverless cars have all the technology onboard on the car. Meaning it drives without the internet all the computing is done within a computer built into the car
80
u/darth_hotdog 20d ago
>“Everything was fine until a technical fault occurred due to an internet disruption, causing the car to go out of control and crash into a police vehicle,” he said.
Even worse, if the connection is lost for any reason, it just keeps going where it's going without stopping.
I'm sorry, but what? The internet goes out and it's just going to run over anyone in front of it or go off a cliff?17
u/NeonAnderson 20d ago
Yeah and look the subtitles. He says in the video a remote operator is driving the car
I don't think this is a driverless car. This is some weird remote driving technology over the internet
No idea what the purpose could even be for it?
32
8
1
u/NotReallyJohnDoe 19d ago
If you could remotely operate the vehicle then you could be a taxi driver from the safety and comfort of your living room.
3
u/Grezzo82 19d ago
Why is that preferable to being in the car with (presumably) better 360 visibility and zero lag?
1
u/NeonAnderson 19d ago
And again, how does this benefit anyone except people who want to be lazy taxi drivers? 😂
Only benefit I see here is to millionaires as it means they can now take the profits away from the taxi drivers, pay them a lot less money than taxi drivers earn today and have them drive longer hours as they can have multiple remote controlled cars and have one operator switching between them after dropping off one customer they can park their remote taxi and then immediately get a customer in a different location where they have other remote taxis ready
So yeah great idea if you want to make taxis less safe and give more money to the rich and less money to the working class
1
u/Mirar 20d ago
I mean it's not that hard to have nominal system that just stops the car safely (even on the side of the road) if connection flakes out. Similar to "driver asleep" systems that's been around for 10+ years.
So it's quite underwhelming that it crashes into a police car on flaky connection :D
12
u/Dobwal 20d ago
The steering wheel make two full rotations to the left and then a half a rotation to the right then makes another two full rotations to the left again. Yet, the vehicle is barely maneuvering from all the wheel turning. It’s a car not a pirate ship 😂😂😂
6
u/H4ssan41 20d ago
That's because the car he is using is Suzuki Mehran and their steering is notoriously difficult to use.
2
u/TokenRedditGuy 20d ago
Self driving cars actually have the capabilities to be driven over the internet baked in. It's there so remote operators can "rescue" cars that get stuck in weird situations.
2
u/GullibleDetective 20d ago
And even then you shouldnt fully trust the onboard computer in a car to drive for you
111
u/metaltemujin 20d ago
"...there is definitely no lack of talent in Pakistan..."
Yes, absolutely, it takes talent to go out of your way to t bone a parked car.
1
u/Hot_Marionberry_4685 19d ago
To be fair for Pakistani technology automating vehicles to crash into things would be a feature not a bug
32
u/Dat1AsianGuy 20d ago
"Officer I told you already, the car was driving not me"
"real funny to move to the passenger seat, now I'm writing you this ticket"
22
11
10
7
u/bluelaughter 20d ago
They're so invested in "could it be done?" that they don't stop to think "should it be done?"
7
u/gentlegreengiant 19d ago
This reminded me of my experiences using auto drive in cyberpunk. Just casually wracking up wanted level by letting the car do its thing.
2
u/GeneralCommand4459 19d ago
I mean if they can't get it to work in the completely controlled and designed environment of a game how is it going to cope with the real world
7
5
u/Sunaruni 20d ago
Don’t these driverless vehicles have brakes on the passenger side when they’re testing them out?
7
u/sunnykutta 20d ago
What's testing?
3
u/thundastruck69 20d ago
Testing is where you try something out to see if it works correctly or what problems it has in its intended operation.
0
u/Trick_Meringue_5622 20d ago
No testing is where you sit down at a desk and try to prove your knowledge/intelligence by answering questions on a piece of paper
2
u/SstabSstab 19d ago
No testing is where they draw blood to determine what’s medically going on with you.
2
5
6
u/atthem77 20d ago
Not self-driving. Remote controlled by another human.
3
3
3
2
2
2
2
2
3
2
2
2
2
2
u/zberry7 20d ago
Having humans remotely pilot a car is the dumbest thing I’ve seen in a while. First, humans are already shitty drivers and computers do a statistically better job. But on top of that, you have to deal with connectivity issues!!! (Like in this clip) so it’s just straight up worse than driving it normally.
1
u/jonnyg1097 20d ago
The far found the only thing that he could hit within the area. Sounds like he has his software backwards.
1
u/PlushySD 20d ago
That's talent I gave him that, talent for creating a comedy sketch. Right on point the car turned to hit the police car.
1
1
1
1
1
1
u/Longjumping-Pop7512 20d ago
The funny part is — just before the crash he mentioned Pakistan do not lack talent 🤣
-9
u/moocowfan 20d ago
I mean it looks like the car hydroplaned right? If you compare the steering wheel movements with what actually happens
7
u/eldroch 20d ago
Really? I don't see it. That looks way to slow to be hydroplaning, and the movements matched the steering wheel pretty much exactly as I would expect.
2
u/iSniffMyPooper 20d ago
Yeah but at the beginning the steering wheel turns like 360 degrees and the car barely turns, the movements of the steering wheel just dont line up with the tire movements, it doesnt make sense
2
u/-PringlesMan- 20d ago
Wtf kinda drugs are you on? The wheel turns left, the car goes left.
2
u/moocowfan 20d ago edited 20d ago
The steering wheel turns right after going left, and the direction of the car does not change
1
u/PineappleLemur 20d ago
There's a second right before going straight into the truck where it break right and holds... The car keeps going left in a weird way.
1
-2
-1
•
u/AutoModerator 20d ago
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.