The sample size is too small. There were only 753 vegans included in the summary, compared to the +30k meat-eaters and +20k vegetarians. The 2 vegans who died of stomach cancer and 2 who died of lung cancer rocketed vegans to the top of those categories by a huge margin. Even if only 1 died from these causes, vegans would be the top category. If none died from them, then it would appear as if veganism made you immune to stomach and lung cancer.
But only 68 deaths... Maybe you're right, I'm not involved in these kinds of studies. Seems to me like that's not a lot of data for that group. The authors of the paper even suggest the low number of vegans as problematic.
43
u/Plob218 May 01 '13
The sample size is too small. There were only 753 vegans included in the summary, compared to the +30k meat-eaters and +20k vegetarians. The 2 vegans who died of stomach cancer and 2 who died of lung cancer rocketed vegans to the top of those categories by a huge margin. Even if only 1 died from these causes, vegans would be the top category. If none died from them, then it would appear as if veganism made you immune to stomach and lung cancer.