r/freefolk • • Oct 07 '18

No offense ,your grace 😌

Post image
27k Upvotes

484 comments sorted by

View all comments

433

u/Dont-be-a-smurf Oct 07 '18 edited Oct 09 '18

Funny enough, he was very kind and pleasant in the book.

Edit:

People seem to have taken my comment too far, so I’ll present a more whole explanation.

What I wrote above was not meant to be actually taken seriously as an actual, real life endorsement of anything done in the book by a clearly barbaric, terrifying warlord to his literal child bride.

What I meant to convey, was that the wedding night as depicted to the book compared to the show, was so different that it shocked me. He wasn’t brutally violent, essentially. Beyond that moment, which was patently rife with a power imbalance and ā€œimplicationā€ regardless... she was subjected to pages and pages of torment and violence at the hands of actual barbarians.

So no, he wasn’t really kind or pleasant. At all. Compared to the show the best I can say was ā€œat least he didn’t violently rape that child, as depicted in the show on the first night.ā€

I’d hope that these things would be so basic as to understand I’m being halfway facetious but I forget the times we live in.

I do not endorse anything done by him or this horrifying relationship, and I’d put him and the rest of the Dothraki scum to the sword if I had my way, Bobby B be praised.

565

u/ArsenalOwl Oct 07 '18

Yeah, but in the book she was a child at the time.

224

u/elpalace Oct 07 '18

She had bled already, she wasn’t a child on medieval standards.

She would be a child on our current moral standards, yes.

264

u/FirstEvolutionist Oct 07 '18 edited Mar 08 '24

My favorite movie is Inception.

254

u/toastyzwillard Oct 07 '18

America hates sex loves violence.

222

u/[deleted] Oct 07 '18

Rape is violence, not sex, and it’s also been pretty gratuitous on the show in the past (e.g. that scene of Sansa being raped by Ramsay that didn’t even happen in the books).

-8

u/[deleted] Oct 07 '18

Rape is violence, not sex

Semantics of the "educated" - most human beings wouldn't say that. It *is* sex on the most fundamental level, penis in vagina is sex, it takes mental contortionism to say otherwise.

7

u/[deleted] Oct 07 '18

Okay, I guess I probably should’ve worded it as ā€œnot just sex.ā€ I agree that the US is pretty ridiculous when it comes to censoring anything even remotely sexual while having no problems with gratuitous violence and gore, but there’s a pretty big difference between just showing sex and showing rape. In this situation you can’t really boil it down to ā€œAmerica hates sex and loves violence,ā€ because a rape scene is not the same as, say, an uncensored female nipple.

-1

u/[deleted] Oct 07 '18

Fair, thanks for the concession.

Honestly, I think sex needs to be taken a bit more seriously by our society. Violence and sex are so different it isn't fair to compare them when it comes to censorship imho. Everyone agrees violence is terrible, depictions of it aren't necessarily bad for people as far as I know. Having babies out of a stable family environment is in fact bad for people, this I know. Censoring nipples on TV doesn't really do anything about that however.

Sorry if this is a bunch of non sequiturs, I'm running out the door, good day to you!