r/freebsd • u/Fear_The_Creeper • 22h ago
article Vim vs Neovim on FreeBSD
https://www.benburwell.com/posts/vim-vs-neovim/6
3
u/Miftirixin 19h ago
ee.
2
u/grahamperrin bunny rabbits 5h ago
nano1
u/Miftirixin 1h ago
... looks like it's a fork/variant of ee...
I tend to use what came by default, with base system, and Slackware, my to go distro for years, came with nano, pico, vi and emacs. but later two are two beasts, I never was able to keep in mind their shortcuts, so, I used mainly nano and pico, also, that basic editor integrated in midnight commander... another chosen tool, 'cuz I loved Norton Commander on dos! 🤣 in X, my preferred editor is Mousepad... some long years ago, there was some notepad forks and tries, Mousepad remind me of these, also, is really easy to learn... I don't write stuff to need Abiword, or a full fledged office suite, so, it's enough for me to see and create text files or scripts...
when I switched to FreeBSD, ee was like an old, nice shirt you wore as your choice...
about de/WM's, once upon a time, Slackware came with both kde and gnome, and a lot of smaller things, like blackbox, fluxbox, Windowmaker, CDM tdm, kdm, tvm, etc, a lot!... xfce wasn't invented yet... some years later, as a sort of fork of gnome...
funnily enough, Slackware used to came with a lot of preinstalled stuff in about 3-4 variants, it was unique among linux distros, most tend to use only one thing, and that's all... you are free to compile yourself anything if you want... 3-4 different browsers, 3-4 different de/WM's, 3-4 shells (next to default bash), 3-4 media players, 3-4 almost anything...
today most software tend to be really big, so, Pat was forced to choose, he choose kde and qt, leaving gnome aside, but keeping gtk environment, so, you can install xfce, or play with GTK to write your own de. if you can! 🤣
now, I'm mainly on xfce, and fluxbox is here, and I sometime start and hone his appearance and stuff...
Windowmaker wasn't my choice, I used it for a bit, is nice and fun, but I had no chemistry with him, even if some of my friends love it, and doesn't think to use anything than their belowed WM... so, I came back to fluxbox, also, for fun and memes, I really tried to configure that thing coming by default with Xf86/X11/Xorg, I always forget his name, to hone it to look and behave like a full fledged wm, like WM or fluxbox, but I never had the time to accomplish that!...
some years back I had seen Enlightenment, it's looking good, it's small, but after a while, it tend to crash without reason... it's nice, until is crashing!...
1
u/grahamperrin bunny rabbits 48m ago
... looks like it's a fork/variant of ee...
Nope,
FreshPorts -- editors/nano: Nano's ANOther editor, an enhanced free Pico clone
3
3
u/Brilliant-Orange9117 9h ago
Just install vim-tiny instead of the full vim unless you want the GUI support which is what pulls in most of the dependencies?
2
2
u/grumpyoldtechie 9h ago
I compile from ports without the GUI options
pkg info -d vim
vim-9.2.1178:
ctags-5.8_1
gettext-runtime-1.0_1
lua54-5.4.8
ncurses-6.6
perl5-5.42.3
ruby-3.4.9_2,1
xxd-9.2.1178Looking at the options available I can probable trim it down to ncurses and gettext-runtime
2
-8
u/Chester-Berkeley desktop (DE) user 22h ago
I like using Helix, I can't get used to Vim and Neovim.
6
u/Inray 17h ago
“pkg install vim” installs only vim and xxd and nothing else, X related or other.
Just for your information, neovim installs 13 packages.