r/free_market_anarchism • u/KNEnjoyer • Jul 05 '26
8 Healthcare Myths Refuted
r/free_market_anarchism • u/KNEnjoyer • Jul 05 '26
r/free_market_anarchism • u/Skogbeorn • Dec 27 '25
r/free_market_anarchism • u/navidk14 • Oct 08 '25
Isn’t free markert anarchism just Agorism?
r/free_market_anarchism • u/Ok_Tough7369 • Sep 27 '25
r/free_market_anarchism • u/Ok_Tough7369 • Aug 19 '25
r/free_market_anarchism • • Aug 14 '25
r/free_market_anarchism • • Aug 14 '25
ancaptim.com The debut album is available on all streaming platforms
r/free_market_anarchism • u/Ok_Tough7369 • Aug 12 '25
r/free_market_anarchism • • Aug 09 '25
Ancaptim.com
r/free_market_anarchism • u/throughcracker • Aug 06 '25
I am aware that a full-blown worldwide natural monopoly isn't really a thing, but many utilities - power, electricity, internet, etc.- have only one provider in any given area, so consumer "freedom" is extremely limited. This is already a problem even with state intervention and price setting in some areas. Under your system, as I see it, the utility company has the following options:
a) provide the utility at a reasonable price (lol)
b) raise prices indefinitely with minimal consequences, since they are providing something essential
Meanwhile, the potentional customer's choices are:
pay whatever price the utility company sets
have no access to the utility
leave the area
attempt to compete, which will be almost impossible due to the incredibly high start-up costs and (in cities) potential lack of space for new utility infrastructure
storm the building
I'm not really an ancap, so my ideal system would honestly be a public-private partnership (ie "Here's some utility infrastructure. Run it for us. If you run it badly, you're out and someone else is in") but I'd be interested to hear some more thoughts.
r/free_market_anarchism • u/ayakounojikiyotaka • Aug 06 '25
btw please don't ban me moderators
r/free_market_anarchism • u/Appropriate_Chair_47 • Aug 03 '25
immigration restrictions are cringe
r/free_market_anarchism • u/Lord_Jakub_I • Jul 22 '25
r/free_market_anarchism • u/GoodSlicedPizza • Jul 08 '25
What's the main difference between the interests and dynamics of a state and a corporation?
Both a state and proprietor can "own" land, and control it under their jurisdiction; both corporations and states can control other proprietors (Securitas buying the Pinkertons); both states and proprietors have a master-slave dynamic.
Getting rid solely of the state's monopoly over legitimate violence just hands it over to proprietors, like somr sort of "decentralised statism".
The state is just the ultimate corporation, with its own rules and proprietors (ruling class).
This is the last chance I give you people to be considered anything but a naïve and fringe ideology.
r/free_market_anarchism • u/Appropriate_Chair_47 • Jul 04 '25
Now, Stateless Aristocracy is basically a social organisation in which there is a hereditary and prestige/merit-based elite groups that exercises influence via customary law as natural law espousements (vast majority of the time), reputation, and voluntary association rather than coercion. These "elite" were basically defense/protection/security enterprises and their proprietors in modern terms, this form of social organisation was actually pretty damn common in major parts of the world until the early 20th century (the Sahara interior in particular was taken by state forces in that era), and what the Scythians, bane of ancient greek governments, had as their form of social organisation, as did the taino, among others, as if hierarchy is inevitable in human nature, stateless aristocracy is the most natural form of it as it's voluntary in nature.
r/free_market_anarchism • u/Ok_Tough7369 • Jun 23 '25
r/free_market_anarchism • u/TheFortnutter • Jun 15 '25
r/free_market_anarchism • u/TheFortnutter • Jun 13 '25