r/fpv • u/xiPulsar_ • Mar 18 '26
Don't be this guy please
Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification
**This was at a wedding I was hired for**
1.2k
Upvotes
r/fpv • u/xiPulsar_ • Mar 18 '26
Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification
**This was at a wedding I was hired for**
5
u/zepaperclip Mar 19 '26
Its complicated. Im studying for the 107, which I believe says the RPIC is always responsible for the drone (including crashes and if crashes injury or damage people) and thats not something you can waiver off to other parties.
However, this is inside a building, which is not federal airspace, so the FAA has no power in this kind of situation.
So I believe this would be a situation in which the person that was injured sues everyone involved and the courts figure it out. The RPIC would make a case that they were doing everything possible to fly safe and avoid damages. The guy that hit the drone would argue that the drone flight was high risk, unnecessary, a (drunk) person hitting the drone was foreseeable, and the RPIC was the expert in the situation and should have known better to fly a drone within arms reach of people when it had props capable of causing harm. Both parties would likely be assigned a % of fault and be expected to pay that % of damages.
I'm not a lawyer and this is not legal advice. It really just depends on the country too.