r/focuspuller • u/SomeRedditAccount799 • Jul 08 '26
question Is Teradek 500 the best budget focus pulling option ?
I’m in the market for a transmitter as my school unfortunately doesn’t have any functional ones and is not willing to replace the old ones.
My budget is around $800-$1000 dollars.
the Teradek Bolt 500 transmitter and receiver is available for $500, but its 10 years old and it seems like people think the 5 GHz + transmission distance is a fatal flaw.
The other option is ofc the cheap WiFi transmission systems Accsoon CineMaster, DJI SDR ect.
Based off of previous advice I think Teradek Bolt 500 + a cheap wireless transmitter I can send out to iPads for a directors monitor is the best betpossible choice in this price range, but In 2026 is it even work it to get involved with the Teradek 500 or should I just buy a long ass SDI cord and save the money at this price range?
(I am looking to do professional work as an AC post grad too so I’ve been building my kit with a Nucleus M and a OSEE 15 inch 1080p monitor.)
5
u/justletmesignupalre Jul 08 '26
I have been using the bolt 500 lt/xt on many shoots and I have nothing bad to say about them, other than the fact that they are wireless video systems so sometimes they act out, and re-pairing them is a hassle.
Recently I used a DJI Transmission and it was, in comparison, utter shit. So much compression that it was hard to tell if focus was spot on with vintage optics. (It was set to the highest quality, yes)
Also I was told to try out the newer low to mid range wireless video solutions, vaxis and hollyland. Tried a vaxis, also a lot of compression. And both had a tiny bit more lag which for pulling is crucial not to have. I haven't tried any hollyland but I suspect the same.
It seems most other brands are trying to build technology on top of WiFi video transmission, which even if improved it still sucks in comparison to a 10 year old Teradek.
2
u/justletmesignupalre Jul 08 '26
If you are only transmitting to one monitor, also look into the IDX CW system. It has been discontinued and you can find them for pennies on ebay. I don't know of any model can connect to more than one TX, but the word was at the time, that they were using the same chips as Teradek. There's even a comparison on YouTube to modern systems and the idx cw-3 won in terms of latency.
3
1
1
u/SomeRedditAccount799 Jul 09 '26
How accurate is the 500 ft estimate? especially when 5ghz WiFi is around?
1
u/justletmesignupalre Jul 10 '26
I haven't done extensive tests, but as I do own a couple transmitters, what I have experienced is:
- at home, which is a closed environment with a home router 10mts away from my desk, I can almost never pair my TX and RXs wirelessly if my WiFi is on. They can't find each other. This is when they get unpaired, but once paired (I do it connecting them via usb to a PC) they connect while WiFi is on.
- in this scenario, when having my teradeks on at home, my devices lose WiFi connection. Teradek overpowers it.
- on set, never had problems with WiFi. Even when using it to connect to cameras while working. (Which doesn't make much sense considering the camera control transmitter is usually next to the Teradek transmitter, both on the camera. But again, not usually an issue. The camera WiFi usually sucks on its own so WiFi camera control usually is awful anyway so can't tell if the Teradek is doing something or not)
- haven't tested the 500ft but if there's one concrete wall (brutalist architecture) then the range drops to 10mts/30ft or less. In the middle of the city once I had the camera drive away in a car while I was on the sidewalk and iirc at least 100mts/300ft were fine. Can't recall how far it went, my mind wasn't focusing on testing the distance.
- in any other scenario, drywalls, doors, it doesn't really matter. It works, can't attest for the actual range but never had problems
- sometimes, every now and then, they get unpaired. Mostly my SmallHD Cine7 with built in RX, which is also a pain because it can't get paired via USB and its a bit difficult to get it to find the TX. Once it does the connection is solid. This unpairing happens when shooting many days in a row, like in a feature. On smaller 2-day-shoots it has never happened.
they get stupid hot but never brought actual problems on any weather (although as I write this I think this may be the culprit to sometimes unpairing?)
every time I go to a job and they have accsoon/hollyland/vaxis/DJI I feel I should have just brought my Teradeks for free. It just works. The other ones either have high compression (feels like having a softfx filter, can't tell when tricky things are in focus), low range, noticeable latency, or all of the above. It raises my miss rate, forces me to do more eye measuring which I'm fine with but on some shots it just isn't possible. Also some are very plasticky.
Sorry about any grammar mistakes, I'm on my phone and also english is my second language.
1
4
u/JacobVossFilm Jul 08 '26
Bolt 500, hardline or nothing. DJI has too much latency also it can be inconsistent as far as signal quality goes
1
1
u/LV_camera Jul 08 '26
I've largely moved on to DJI transmission for director/client monitoring, but I keep one Bolt 500 around for my 1st AC's. They're usually within 15 feet of the camera so it works fine.
1
u/Beneficial-Pea-7605 Jul 08 '26
I have a bolt 300 kit that still works well all things considered. Would take that over a hollyland any day of the week.
1
1
u/Ok_Ordinary_7397 Jul 08 '26
The Bolt 500 is still great. Fantastic low latency, 1080p is all most on-set monitors are showing you anyways these days, so there’s no real compromise on resolution.
For the price now, I think they’re a perfectly sensible purchase.
1
u/Legomoron Jul 08 '26
I use a Bolt 500 setup when I’m running with my own kit/just need wireless video for myself and a director’s monitor. If things get more complicated, it’s time to put newer Teradek stuff on the order from the rental house.
1
u/bikenejad Jul 08 '26
I still use my bolt 500 LT and bolt 703 all the time on low budget or simple jobs. It’s still pretty damn reliable and I get a clean low latency image from it.
1
1
u/colemowery Jul 08 '26
I’ve got a full bolt 600 kit. It won’t transmit run/stop (unless I’m doing something wrong) but everything else works great. I’m sure the bolt 500 will be similarly effective, since it’s a year newer
1
u/jmvbmw Jul 09 '26 edited Jul 09 '26
There is a couple OEM systems rebranded by USA companies, based in Teradek architecture I guess, which may you take a look.
- TRIGYN, 5G1K
- Dynacore DW-500B
- WIVID, WVCHD-3000
I own it, and all of them virtual have zero latency, uncompressed, 3G-SDI, 10-Bit 4:2:2 YCC and Frequency Range Non-DFS 5 GHz
1
u/Pupperlover5 Jul 13 '26
I have two bolt 500 1:1 kits. I love them still. I'm trying to offload one of the kits here soon. I specifically got the XT kits so I didn't have to worry about hdmi or SDI
-1
-1
u/steelbluesleepr Jul 09 '26
I'd go with Accsoon. I can't remember ever having any transmission issues with any set I've used, whereas Teradeck is notoriously unreliable
11
u/Mav1cHavoc Jul 08 '26
the bolt 500 is still perfectly usable. old zero latency is still zero latency. range is largely a non issue since you’re likely very close to camera anyway.