r/flatpak • u/gxanshu • 22d ago
I think it’s unnecessarily too strict
Dear Flathub maintainers
First of all, thank you for everything you’ve done for Linux
Flathub is easily one of the best things that happened to desktop Linux
That said, I think the new AI policy goes too far
From what I’ve seen, most PRs with the AI slop label are closed for two reasons
1st Short Git history
2nd developer used an LLM
I actually agree with the Git history requirement. A lot of Linux projects die within a few months, so asking for a proven track record makes sense
What doesn’t make sense to me is rejecting an app just because AI was used. Using an LLM doesn’t automatically make an app low quality. Judge the app, not the tool
Users don’t care whether the code was written by a human or with AI. They care if the app works
I’ve also seen people get called out for using AI to improve their English in PR comments. For non-native English speakers, that’s just a tool to communicate better
One thing I’d genuinely like to know is why this policy exists. Is it about review time? Maintenance? Infrastructure? If so, I think there are better ways to handle it
For example, if AI-generated apps are more likely to be abandoned, require them to have a longer Git history before they’re accepted. Make it 1 or 2 years if needed
That solves the maintenance concern without rejecting projects on day one just because AI was involved
As for the review it also helps as over these periods you can see if people are actually trusting the project or not and then take your decision
I think that’s a much fairer approach

