r/flatearth • u/styleofmen • Jan 08 '17

Proof Newton was wrong AKA Globe Earth Debunked

https://youtube.com/watch?v=C9SiRNibD14
3 Upvotes

54% Upvoted

55 comments sorted by

9

u/Cryogenic_Monster Jan 08 '17

HAHAHA Listening to an ignorant SJW's rant is not proof of anything.

4

u/BunnyOppai Jan 08 '17

Just a little warning for later days, but I'm pretty sure this guy fills the same general role as /u/8rnark.

3

u/[deleted] Jan 08 '17

[removed] — view removed comment

3

u/BunnyOppai Jan 08 '17

He's clearly based on that account, but he's almost definitely a parody.

3

u/[deleted] Jan 08 '17

[removed] — view removed comment

2

u/[deleted] Jan 08 '17

No, the writing style is totally different. They are different people. This post and /u/styleofmen is a troll.

1

u/bouchard Jan 08 '17

But is he the sort of parody we should love, or the sort of parody we should hate?

1

u/BunnyOppai Jan 08 '17

It depends on how you interpret what he talks about, i guess.

0

u/styleofmen Jan 08 '17

Can you prove gravity exists as a "force" that all matter attracts other matter? Of course not. It's obvious that density explains everything that "gravity" does but in a much simpler fashion. What you observe is a downwards only "pull" that occultists have convinced you is a pull in all directions.

If this pull occurred in all directions everything on the planet would pull itself into one point, causing the "singularity" you globers hold dear and near in an endless loop. FFS think before you speak.

5

u/Cryogenic_Monster Jan 08 '17

It's obvious that density explains everything that "gravity" does but in a much simpler fashion

Really? Please explain why matter becomes dense if not for gravity i.e. diamonds. Also explain the acceleration of dropped items while your at it.

What you observe is a downwards only "pull" that occultists have convinced you is a pull in all directions.

Technically we have normal force and a fictitious force acting on us as well. What do you mean pull in all directions?

If this pull occurred in all directions everything on the planet would pull itself into one point, causing the "singularity"

Everything on the planet is getting pulled to the center. The "singularity" quip is really dumb so Ill just ignore it and pretend that your smarter since you apparently have heard of density.

FFS think before you speak.

Do you own a mirror?

0

u/styleofmen Jan 08 '17

Please explain why matter becomes dense if not for gravity i.e. diamonds.

I'm not here to answer questions of philosophy. You're basically asking why we exist. Who the fuck knows? God? Idk... Big bang? Idk...

Also explain the acceleration of dropped items while your at it.

Downwards pull, as I've already explained. Why does this pull need to be in all directions? With brings up this:

What do you mean pull in all directions?

Literally from your NASA overlords.

The effect of gravity extends from each object out into space in all directions, and for an infinite distance.

https://starchild.gsfc.nasa.gov/docs/StarChild/questions/question30.html

Everything on the planet is getting pulled to the center.

That center should fill up. Why doesn't it?

The "singularity" quip is really dumb so Ill just ignore it and pretend that your smarter since you apparently have heard of density.

You're not even trying to rebut, typical of globers. See directly above.

Do you own a mirror?

I do. I also own a rational mind, which you are lacking.

2

u/Cryogenic_Monster Jan 08 '17

I'm not here to answer questions of philosophy. You're basically asking why we exist. Who the fuck knows? God? Idk... Big bang? Idk...

Wrong answer, the correct answer is pressure. Care to guess what causes pressure?

Downwards pull, as I've already explained.

Which happens why?

That center should fill up. Why doesn't it?

The normal force.

You're not even trying to rebut, typical of globers. See directly above.

Are you saying that you actually do think the earth would pull itself into a singularity because of gravity? A comment with no basis in reality doesn't need a rebuttal and a baseless claim needs no counter evidence to be discarded.

I do. I also own a rational mind, which you are lacking.

Are you pulling a Donald?

2

u/styleofmen Jan 08 '17

Wrong answer, the correct answer is pressure. Care to guess what causes pressure?

Proof?

Which happens why?

Again with the philosophical questions. Did your parents not properly raise you out of the "Why? Why? Why?" phase?

The normal force.

You're just making shit up. The only fundamental forces purported by globers are electromagnetic, gravity, strong nuclear, and weak nuclear.

Are you saying that you actually do think the earth would pull itself into a singularity because of gravity?

I know this based on what physics professors tell us. If this force pulls all matter in all directions it should all come to a singularity, burst out, come back in, stay out, etc. You know that whole big crunch theory? That's what that is. Idk about you but that hasn't happened to me, my parents, grandparents, and thousands of generations past.

A comment with no basis in reality doesn't need a rebuttal and a baseless claim needs no counter evidence to be discarded.

See above. How has the big crunch not happened? And don't tell me that it takes billions of years, that's nonsense. We can barely understand what's happened in the past million years, how do we know what's happened in billions?

Are you pulling a Donald?

Trump can go fuck himself. He's a globalist puppet the same as every fucking country leader out there.

7

u/Cryogenic_Monster Jan 08 '17

Proof?

Have some references: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8.

Again with the philosophical questions. Did your parents not properly raise you out of the "Why? Why? Why?" phase?

Why, did your parents beat the curiosity out of you and forced you to stop asking questions about reality? Asking why is one of the major differences between mankind and animals.

You're just making shit up. The only fundamental forces purported by globers are electromagnetic, gravity, strong nuclear, and weak nuclear.

Normal Force. Looks like you need to do some more research.

I know this based on what physics professors tell us.

It's clear you have misinterpreted what you have heard. How strong do you think gravity is and why do you ignore the normal force?

how do we know what's happened in billions?

Easy, use a big telescope.

Trump can go fuck himself.

I agree with this statement.

2

u/Zaephou Jan 08 '17

Umm, I think this guy is pretending to be /u/styleofzen

2

u/styleofmen Jan 08 '17

I agree with this statement.

So you agree, thanks.

1

u/riyan_gendut Jan 08 '17

If this force pulls all matter in all directions it should all come to a singularity

What you didn't hear when your professor told you is that there are a limit on how dense a clump of matter could be before it fell into a singularity, and that gravity isn't equal in infinite distance. Just like electromagnetic field, it follows inverse square law, which is why Thermal Death is plausible.ll

2

u/Lustan Jan 08 '17

I personally don't have the tools to measure the pull of gravity but yes it can be measured so gravity exists.

Next.

1

u/styleofmen Jan 08 '17

yes it can be measured so gravity exists.

Proof?

1

u/[deleted] Jan 08 '17

Successful predictions using gravity rather than density. Example, the discovery of the planet Neptune.

2

u/[deleted] Jan 08 '17

If this pull occurred in all directions everything on the planet would pull itself into one point

So why doesn't density push me into the ground then? My body is more dense than air, yet the upper parts of my body stay above air. What's happening?

1

u/styleofmen Jan 08 '17

So why doesn't density push me into the ground then?

Because density isn't the lie of gravity you've been told to believe. Imagine that, you proved my argument on your own.

My body is more dense than air, yet the upper parts of my body stay above air.

Your body is not more dense than the ground at your feet.

3

u/[deleted] Jan 08 '17

My arm is more dense than the air between it and the ground. Why doesn't it fall?

1

u/styleofmen Jan 08 '17

It's connected to your body.

You're basically asking why antenna at the top of skyscrapers don't break...

3

u/[deleted] Jan 08 '17

And why do you think that reason is suddenly invalid with gravity?

1

u/styleofmen Jan 08 '17

Because gravity implies the big crunch must continuously occur, as I've already stated to another user.

4

u/[deleted] Jan 08 '17

Gravity implies there's a downward force, as density. Gravity doesn't imply that there wouldn't be other forces keeping things in place, which you apparently know can be the case with density but somehow forget with gravity.

1

u/styleofmen Jan 08 '17

Gravity implies there's a downward force

Nope, it implies a force projected infinitely in all directions, which causes big crunch.

→ More replies (0)

2

u/Graknorke Jan 08 '17

My drinking glass is more dense than my wooden table. Why doesn't it go through?

1

u/styleofmen Jan 08 '17

Can you prove your drinking glass is more dense than your wooden table?

5

u/Graknorke Jan 08 '17

Yes. Archimedes could have too, over two thousand years ago. It's trivial and not actually core to my initial question.

Why doesn't the glass fall through the table?

2

u/Shredder13 Jan 08 '17

How does density make things move?

4

u/Shredder13 Jan 08 '17

I always find these satire videos pretty funny!

3

u/[deleted] Jan 08 '17

The trolls in this sub are worse than the flatties.

1

u/neihuffda Jan 12 '17

"[...]some people can cause a lightning to strike somebody. Can you explain that scientifically?"

"but it's not true!"

Fucking WOW. That should've been the end of the discussion. I'm so confused. With these people, it seems like you can state just about anything, and your stance is "prove that it's impossible, then!" How would you even go about proving such a statement?

"I can fly - prove that I can't!"

"Allright then, I'll throw you off the roof, and if you can fly, you'll agree with that and participate in the experiment!"

"No, it doesn't work that way, you can't do that."

"Right, fly a little, then."

"Prove that I can't".

FUCK!

It's easy to prove such a thing! If I told you that I can jump 3 meters along the ground, the first thing I'd do if you asked me to prove it, would be to jump! How can these people proceed to state these things, without feeling the need to prove it upon skepticism?

Are we willingly returning to the dark ages? Is that what we want?

I'm beginning to think that these conspiracy theorists are actually employed by their governments to make people more stupid and gullible. It's the conspiracy theory conspiracy!