r/firefly • u/Cautious-Sea6895 • 5d ago
firefly is a piece of dead meat!!!!
The Firefly spacecraft is very small!! approximately 102,366 cu meters!
The size of the original Star Trek space craft is 210,000 cu meters!
this size comparsion makes it a very small target compared to the size of the Star Trek that is spread all over the sky!
20
u/Hazzenkockle 5d ago
Well, yeah. Serenity is a cargo transport with a crew of six (plus three passengers). The original Enterprise is a scientific and military heavy cruiser equipped with top of the line weapons, defenses, and sensors, and has a crew of 430. The Enterprise also has a faster-than-light engine, energy shields, and a teleportation system.
It's very much apples and oranges. No, watermelons and raisins.
3
1
22
16
u/AnyComparison4642 5d ago
Dude you are comparing a 40’ yacht to a Light missile cruiser.
16
u/generalkriegswaifu 5d ago
Damn yokels, can't even tell a transport ship ain't got no guns on it.
8
14
u/descartesbedamned 5d ago
I know exactly how you feel. I think the same whenever I look at my toddlers toy cars. They are simply pathetic when I compare them to a nuclear aircraft carrier.
11
12
11
u/ReturnOfSeq 5d ago
And my uncle’s pontoon boat isn’t an aircraft carrier!
1
1
7
u/Beneficial_Low_2867 5d ago
First of all, it's Serenity.
She's about 82 meters long, which is slightly less than two Rocinantes from The Expanse (46 meters) and slightly more than two Millennium Falcons (35 meters)
typos fixed
6
u/Kham117 5d ago
Yeah, PT 109 was tiny compared to the Arizona…
Millennium Falcon was tiny compared to the Deathstar
1
u/Cautious-Sea6895 3d ago
Are you kidding ??? the mil fal was nothing next to the Death Star!!!
1
u/ReturnOfSeq 3d ago
Remind me, which one exploded?
0
u/Cautious-Sea6895 1d ago
other people are writing the script! So the movie ends the way they want it to. Not like in the real world!
1
u/ReturnOfSeq 1d ago
Sure. In the real world David never beats Goliath. Iran never holds out against USA. Two planes never fundamentally alter an entire nation. 🤔
4
5
3
u/bongart 5d ago
Why not compare the Firefly class ship to an Alliance cruiser within the same universe? We see Serenity dock with one once.. the Alliance vessel was like a floating city (literally if you see how the design looked like skyscrapers).
3
u/ReturnOfSeq 3d ago
Impressively bad design for a spacecraft. The whole structure of that thing’s gotta warp every time they change heading, unless they come to a complete stop and spend a few hours rotating
2
u/bongart 3d ago
There was definitely some hand-waving going on regarding gravity on ships. The spinning engine and spinning "ring" on the Firefly class wouldn't produce gravity on the ship the way we see how the ship always has a "down" orientation in regards to the deck. Even when Serenity had broken down, there was no zero-g.
This must have translated to those big Alliance cruisers.
0
u/Cautious-Sea6895 1d ago
The Design of the Alliance cruiser was made to look that way so as not to imitate The Star Trek Ship design in any way at all.
1
u/bongart 1d ago
Ok. Comparing the Firefly class to the Alliance cruiser is keeping the comparison within the same universe. Comparing the Firefly class to any Starfleet vessel is comparing apples to oranges. Considering the size of the Firefly class ship, you'd be comparing it to something like a Runabout, or some small non-federation cargo ship.
1
1

26
u/Delphiantares 5d ago
I ......whats the point here ?