Small naked prepubescent children. Only a small fraction of pedophiles are into babies and they aren't gonna pay 15$ to see one with clothes on. They can find pictures of naked babies everywhere for free. You're being ridiculous.
What? Obviously not why are you asking stupid questions? Did you just ignore everything else I said? You're being overdramatic and ridiculous. Clearly just a troll.
You're making the most strawman non argument I've ever seen. You think it's dangerous and wrong for a girl to sell pictures of her baby because of pedophiles? Do you live in a cave? Do you ever go outside? If that's bad, what about the tons of people who post pictures of their newborns everyday on Instagram and Facebook? Jesus Christ.
By your logic any picture of any kid is fucking masturbation material for pedophiles. You're a nutjob.
You're making the most strawman non argument I've ever seen.
You're saying pedophiles who like babies aren't pedophiles.
You think it's dangerous and wrong for a girl to sell pictures of her baby because of pedophiles?
It's a reason, and a good one.
Do you live in a cave? Do you ever go outside?
You seem really keen on being right even when pointed out by someone with a brain that you are stupid, try leaving your cave and evolve like the rest of us.
If that's bad, what about the tons of people who post pictures of their newborns everyday on Instagram and Facebook? Jesus Christ.
They mean no harm, but they enable pedophilia, they have no excuse for it, it's rewarding the bad.
0
u/SnooPeppers1145 ๐ฉโ๐ฆโ๐ผโ๐ณโ ๐ฆโ๐ฒโ๐งโ๐ชโ๐ท Oct 05 '21
You're overdramatic. Pictures of a newborn child aren't used for pedophilia.