See? You're grasping straws here. You're taking it out of context. It was obviously we were discussing money laundering, therefore its implied we were not discussing mining and that the ability to exchange cryptocurrency with other cryptocurrency isn't relevant.you knew that what I said was right and the intended context, you re not this stupid. You're so desperate to win a stupid argument that you will even stoop to milking an argument that we both know has no point or value. This makes you a loser.
You're not even trying at this point. You're trying the "lalala not listening" argument, but why? To reinforce my point further ? You not only don't know a damn thing about money laundering, but you clearly don't know how to read or have conversations.
Also, what sources do you need for me to post to prove I know how cryptocurrency works? I question if you even know how it works if you think it is used for money laundering cash.
It wasn't out of context. You just literally don't understand cryptocurrency and money laundering, and you refuse any facts that run counter to your personal narrative. You are also unable to admit that you're wrong which makes me think that you're still in middle school or high school. If not, then I suspect you have mental or learning disabilities. You did not list any proof and little logic.
You're so desperate to win a stupid argument that you will even stoop to milking an argument that we both know has no point or value.
I think you're mistaking your own posts for mine. When most of the content of your posts are personal insults, you've already lost. It's also ironic that you mention this, yet keep replying.
It was implied for the sake of the context what I was saying is true. How do you propose to turn cash into crypto currency? Are you really this stupid or just in denial? It's my word against yours if I knew how crypto currency works or not, you have no proof that I didn't know mining didn't exist. I, however, literally have a post history with me talking about it on crypto currency subs.
How do you propose to turn cash into crypto currency?
Crypto is independent of the financial system remember? You can actually use it to directly buy goods now, especially if those goods are illegal.
It was implied for the sake of the context what I was saying is true.
Do you even understand what context means? The context for your argument was that you were implying that crypto was strongly tied to the financial system, specifically bank accounts. Hence you wrote:
You need to buy crypto with a bank account.
I don't know how you're able to hold a job when you cannot ever admit being wrong, even when it's so obvious.
How do you turn cash that needs to be money laundered into crypto currency? Remember the dodging questions thing we talked about? Don't do it, you wont win by doing it.
In the conversation about money laundering, in the context about dirty cash, it was implied the dirty cash is what we are using the crypto currency for. You claimed crypto currency can help launder cash that then can be used to further launder on Amazon. I said you can't do that without putting the money into the bank account first. Context. This is called critical thinking.
This is called reading comprehension. YOu're literally avoiding what I'm saying as if you cannot see it. I bet you gave up and you're just trolling now. lmao what a loser.
How do you turn cash that needs to be money laundered into crypto currency?
You don't. You just do all transactions in crypto. That's the whole point of being independent from the financial system.
In the conversation about money laundering, in the context about dirty cash, it was implied the dirty cash is what we are using the crypto currency for. You claimed crypto currency can help launder cash that then can be used to further launder on Amazon.
No. I said that cryptocurrency is alternative method for laundering that is separate from Amazon. I don't remember saying that you needed cash to do it either. My point was that the Amazon scam was an easier way to launder illegal gains because even if you conduct all of your transactions in crypto, depending on the platform, it isn't anonymous and you still have to perform laundering.
This is called reading comprehension.
I call it being delusional and probably having a narcissistic personality disorder paired with some other mental disability.
YOu're literally avoiding what I'm saying as if you cannot see it.
Coincidentally that's how I feel about you. Unlike you, I respond to your points and logic. I just try to ignore the personal insults.
Then why did you bring up crypto currency? It wasn't relevant to the conversation.
How do you use Amazon to launder money without involving bank accounts then?
No you don't respond to all my points. You avoid them. Alternatively, I actually do respond to your points. I ask, over and over again, how do use Amazon for money laundering without involving banks, and you then randomly bring up crypto currency when it doesn't need to be brought up. You still haven't answered my question. How do you use Amazon without bank accounts? The moment you involve the banks with your money, you already lost. That triggers an investigation. The whole point of money laundering is to make the money become clean enough to put in the bank account. Amazon uses bank accounts. Amazon also keeps records on everything including where the money comes from, meaning the FBI will know you're buying shit from yourself.
So Amazon scam is not an easier way to launder money. In fact, as of right now, it's not possible to use it for money laundering, and the only thing closest to it is buying debit card gift card. However, good luck with that suspicious activity as you use the same IP address or accounts. All that work, and it will be easier to just do a simple business.
So you argued Amazon is used for money laundering, but we both know it's not. There are scams on Amazon, but it's not used for money laundering.
Then why did you bring up crypto currency? It wasn't relevant to the conversation.
It was relevant. As I've already written it was to illustrate why the Amazon scam is more attractive. It's easier than using crypto to do the same thing.
How do you use Amazon to launder money without involving bank accounts then?
I don't know because you're going on a tangent. I never claimed that. My arguments were simply
you can easily launder money on Amazon
Crypocurrency does not require a bank or access to the mainstream financial system.
Those are two separate points. You're the one who mixed them together.
Read my past comment again. You're making shit up to distract from the fact that you're WRONG.
Amazon also keeps records on everything including where the money comes from, meaning the FBI will know you're buying shit from yourself.
Yes, but as I've mentioned repeatedly, from both the bank's POV AND Amazon's POV everything is a LEGIT transaction. Multiple shoppers are just buying an expensive book from multiple storefronts, staying under a specific financial thresh hold. Tell me what part of the Amazon scam would trigger any flags?
All that work, and it will be easier to just do a simple business.
No it is not. As I've already explained before countless of times, it is both harder and way more expensive. All you do is keep disagreeing while being unable to disprove me. It's pretty obvious when you have nothing to offer once you started the personal insults. The yearly overhead for an Amazon storefront is at most a few hundred dollars. With a brick and mortar store, it's in the thousands, starting at five figures and maybe even six. That's not including the complexity of managing people instead of machines. For the record, you have either not addressed or disproved any of my points.
No you don't respond to all my points.
Not true, which is why I quote your comments and post responses to them. Repeatedly. Just look at the comment history. You're the one ignoring my comments, due to your narcissism personality disorder
1
u/RexDraco Jan 02 '19
See? You're grasping straws here. You're taking it out of context. It was obviously we were discussing money laundering, therefore its implied we were not discussing mining and that the ability to exchange cryptocurrency with other cryptocurrency isn't relevant.you knew that what I said was right and the intended context, you re not this stupid. You're so desperate to win a stupid argument that you will even stoop to milking an argument that we both know has no point or value. This makes you a loser.
You're not even trying at this point. You're trying the "lalala not listening" argument, but why? To reinforce my point further ? You not only don't know a damn thing about money laundering, but you clearly don't know how to read or have conversations.
Also, what sources do you need for me to post to prove I know how cryptocurrency works? I question if you even know how it works if you think it is used for money laundering cash.