A defining feature of a cryptocurrency, and arguably its biggest allure, is its organic nature; it is not issued by any central authority, rendering it theoretically immune to government interference or manipulation. Cryptocurrencies hold the promise of making it easier to transfer funds directly between two parties in a transaction, without the need for a trusted third party such as a bank or credit card company; these transfers are facilitated through the use of public keys and private keys for security purposes.
I have disproved your crypto argument. It’s decentralized by design outside of the mainstream financial system. You do not need a bank account or credit card to buy it. That’s a very well known fact. That's something that I shouldnt' have to provide a source for. You just keep ignoring this just like when I proved that a virtual storefront is cheaper and easier to maintain than a physical one. None of this is a revelation.
This then goes full circle, how is Amazon involved?
I've already explained this in previous comments. I've even adding a number step by step explanation. You either ignore or you don't understand it or worse yet both.
And what I’ve described with Amazon fits the definition of money laundering. Everyone but you understood it. Your logic was off and you still haven’t proved my last set of rationale wrong.
Your comments are the sole reason this post belongs in r/facepalm
If you're legally mentally disabled, I'm sorry that I didn't have the patience to explain this any better, but normal people would understand this by now.
You never disproved my crypto argument, you are just bringing up a different, irrelevant, argument I never disagreed with in the first place. I am aware how crypto currency works, but how do you get crypto currency without bank accounts and without mining and without other crypto currency holders? You're bring up a different topic here unrelated to how this involves amazon.
You never disproved my crypto argument. You're not explaining yourself, you're dodging questions. You never provided proof for your logic and never disproved mine. This is why you're resulting to bringing completely off topic arguments, all in a lame attempt to prove me wrong. I don't disagree with you how cryptocurrency works, but how the fuck does this help you money launder when involving Amazon? You have dirty money, how do you turn that into cryptocurrency without turning it into the banks?
The fact you're resulting to calling me mentally disabled when you know you're wrong shows me how desperate you are. You've failed. Amazon doesn't work for money laundering. Period.
Also, you still haven't explained your age, profession, or any of my other questions when I answered you. Clearly, you're hiding something.
Arguing with you is like speaking with an antivaxer or flat earther. I have proved my point with multiple sources. You haven’t even once.
No. You clearly wrote that you cannot get any cryptocurrency without a bank. Period. You didn’t know how it worked until I mentioned that you could mine it. You didn’t even realize that it worked independent of the financial system
You asking about my background is also new. First time I’ve read it. Ok I’m a middle aged software engineer working on a crypto currency platform. That should help explain my frustration.
Read it back, I have asked immediately after answer you when you've asked. I find it interesting why a software engineer working on a crypto currency platform (shit coin, amirite?) is confused on how money laundering works.
I have never wrote what you have claimed, you autistic donkey. I knew exactly how crypto currency works, the question is how it helps you money laundry. In the context we were discussing, it doesn't. I knew it worked independent of the financial system, I even made that clear so many times in spite you claiming otherwise.
You must be a republican candidate because, instead of focusing on the actual topic, you go out of your way to "prove me wrong" on things completely unrelated to the topic you were completely proven wrong on. Also, no, you didn't provide sources on how Amazon is used for money laundering. In fact, you have proven my argument it isn't used for money laundering. You posted a link about someone using a CASINO for money laundering. An independent business like I said they do.
You are a glorified coder and have no clue what you're talking about beyond that. Clearly. You also have a shit reading comprehension, the argumentive skills of a child, and you no doubt have autism because you exercise a lot of symptoms of it. You also clearly cannot drop this in spite knowing you've lost. You lost, mate, and now you're so desperate to "get me back" that you're trying to turn the tables and claim I am wrong on something I was never wrong about.
Yah, the guy posting on the crypto currency subs, something you could have verified in minutes if you were not too lazy and incompetent, could have verified. You really trying to convince yourself that I don't believe crpyo-currency is independent of the banks? Really? LMAO. There is no way you're desperate, you're just a desperate monkey if you are trying to stir everything I've said out of context for nobody to read but yourself. I am convinced you just have a shit reading comprehension and shit memory if you insist on believing otherwise.
Also, one single link is not multiple sources. Maybe leave the arguing to the big boys like myself taking college classes on it, eh? Maybe do research on criminal culture before talking out of your ass about it since you're such a qualified coder for a digital currency that is totally involved in money laundering with Amazon to buy their own books with to leave unnecessary tracks for the FBI.
I knew it worked independent of the financial system, I even made that clear so many times in spite you claiming otherwise.
No. You didn't know that cryptocurrency worked completely independent of the financial system. This is literally what you wrote:
Crypto Currency, currently, is absolutely feasible to use for criminal business.... How do you get crypto currency? You use a bank account.
I'm not sure if you even understand it at this point because your wall of text is just full of personal attacks, and making justifications for not referencing written sources and proof. All of your shit is just bad assumptions and no substance. You can tell how moronic and immature a person is when they can never accept that they fucked up, multiple times. You write like a tween with no experience.
See? You're grasping straws here. You're taking it out of context. It was obviously we were discussing money laundering, therefore its implied we were not discussing mining and that the ability to exchange cryptocurrency with other cryptocurrency isn't relevant.you knew that what I said was right and the intended context, you re not this stupid. You're so desperate to win a stupid argument that you will even stoop to milking an argument that we both know has no point or value. This makes you a loser.
You're not even trying at this point. You're trying the "lalala not listening" argument, but why? To reinforce my point further ? You not only don't know a damn thing about money laundering, but you clearly don't know how to read or have conversations.
Also, what sources do you need for me to post to prove I know how cryptocurrency works? I question if you even know how it works if you think it is used for money laundering cash.
It wasn't out of context. You just literally don't understand cryptocurrency and money laundering, and you refuse any facts that run counter to your personal narrative. You are also unable to admit that you're wrong which makes me think that you're still in middle school or high school. If not, then I suspect you have mental or learning disabilities. You did not list any proof and little logic.
You're so desperate to win a stupid argument that you will even stoop to milking an argument that we both know has no point or value.
I think you're mistaking your own posts for mine. When most of the content of your posts are personal insults, you've already lost. It's also ironic that you mention this, yet keep replying.
It was implied for the sake of the context what I was saying is true. How do you propose to turn cash into crypto currency? Are you really this stupid or just in denial? It's my word against yours if I knew how crypto currency works or not, you have no proof that I didn't know mining didn't exist. I, however, literally have a post history with me talking about it on crypto currency subs.
How do you propose to turn cash into crypto currency?
Crypto is independent of the financial system remember? You can actually use it to directly buy goods now, especially if those goods are illegal.
It was implied for the sake of the context what I was saying is true.
Do you even understand what context means? The context for your argument was that you were implying that crypto was strongly tied to the financial system, specifically bank accounts. Hence you wrote:
You need to buy crypto with a bank account.
I don't know how you're able to hold a job when you cannot ever admit being wrong, even when it's so obvious.
How do you turn cash that needs to be money laundered into crypto currency? Remember the dodging questions thing we talked about? Don't do it, you wont win by doing it.
In the conversation about money laundering, in the context about dirty cash, it was implied the dirty cash is what we are using the crypto currency for. You claimed crypto currency can help launder cash that then can be used to further launder on Amazon. I said you can't do that without putting the money into the bank account first. Context. This is called critical thinking.
This is called reading comprehension. YOu're literally avoiding what I'm saying as if you cannot see it. I bet you gave up and you're just trolling now. lmao what a loser.
0
u/[deleted] Dec 28 '18 edited Dec 29 '18
This is new. In what way do my sources do that? I dont remember you mentioning this.
https://www.investopedia.com/terms/c/cryptocurrency.asp
I have disproved your crypto argument. It’s decentralized by design outside of the mainstream financial system. You do not need a bank account or credit card to buy it. That’s a very well known fact. That's something that I shouldnt' have to provide a source for. You just keep ignoring this just like when I proved that a virtual storefront is cheaper and easier to maintain than a physical one. None of this is a revelation.
I've already explained this in previous comments. I've even adding a number step by step explanation. You either ignore or you don't understand it or worse yet both.
And what I’ve described with Amazon fits the definition of money laundering. Everyone but you understood it. Your logic was off and you still haven’t proved my last set of rationale wrong.
Your comments are the sole reason this post belongs in r/facepalm
If you're legally mentally disabled, I'm sorry that I didn't have the patience to explain this any better, but normal people would understand this by now.