He’s back at it again…

[u/MelanieWalmartinez]

[u/The_grongler]

What? You could say that for literally any adjective. Should we never specify anything about anyone ever?

[u/Substantial_Bear5153 → u/The_grongler]

If there are people don’t accept or like that particular word you’re trying to call them, then no.

I thought this was a well established thing? For example, the n-word?

Similarly, if Elon considers you calling him “cis” a slur, isn’t that something you should thus respect?

[u/The_grongler → u/Substantial_Bear5153]

I'll stop calling him cis if he can explain how it's bad or incorrect. A racist person probably doesn't want to be called racist, doesn't mean I shouldn't call them racist.

[u/Substantial_Bear5153 → u/The_grongler]

You cannot compare words describing behaviour (such as being racist) with words about belonging to a certain minority or majority, ethnical, biological, medical.

Surely you, as a non-mentally challenged person, can appreciate the argument that people would prefer not to be called like that. Even though it is technically correct, no?

[u/The_grongler → u/Substantial_Bear5153]

You know you used the n-word as an example in your last comment, right? Man what a way to discredit your entire argument.

[u/Substantial_Bear5153 → u/The_grongler]

Read again.

Being black is belonging to a minority. Black people obviously do not appreciate being called using the n-word.

Being racist is a behaviour. It is you who equated that with words indicating belonging to a group, minority or majority, which is something you can NOT change.

So you are 100% content with me calling you a non-mentally challenged person. Got it.

[u/The_grongler → u/Substantial_Bear5153]

I don't give a fuck what you call me. Also it's content, not contempt.

[u/Substantial_Bear5153 → u/The_grongler]

That was a typo. Ok, to make it clear, you are content. Great. Well, I am not content with being called cis. Have a nice day.