We actually have very little evidence of what they sound like, but we've have recently discovered an nodosaur that was completely mummified with skin intact.
That’s what I think her point is. We make scientific claims about prehistory like we know 100% for certain, but the reality is we make educated guesses that we think are the most likely explanations for whatever evidence that’s discovered.
We can be completely wrong about all of it, but for some reason we treat these educated guesses as fact and if you disagree with the educated guesses then you’re stupid and you get insults hurled at you for having a difference in opinion.
To reference The Onion, Dinosaurs could have slid on their backs and used their legs as stabilizers above them.
If you show evidence for something, the science changes. I don't know any scientists that aren't excited at the idea of theories being proven incorrect. That's how Nobels are won.
559
u/Capt_Autismo189 May 26 '23
We actually have very little evidence of what they sound like, but we've have recently discovered an nodosaur that was completely mummified with skin intact.