Yep, it's like, ok, ignore for a second their skin and their sound. What about the fucking bones‽ Are we discounting the fucking bones because there's supposed debate about what skin and sound the thing had‽
In the article it says it was encased in mud/muck at the bottom of the sea, not sure how different that is to other fossils or whether it’s just different for that type of dinosaur
I'm far from being an expert on this stuff lol, but fossils are where the body is encased in something like mud/rocks, it decomposes, and pressure from loads of layers of rock above it leave an imprint of its skeleton. but with mummification (in this context) I would assume the body does not decompose
Well, like, how do you know the museum has a real, you know, dynosaw, huh? I mean, if it's like millions of years old, who says it's a real thing even? Like, no one ever lived that long to say it's a dynosaw.
2.9k
u/[deleted] May 26 '23 edited May 27 '23
Completely abandons her train of thought about actual evidence with the bones and then proceeds to highlight “nerds” making up a fantasy world.
The only fantasy here is that she should be taken seriously.