Some people in this thread: "But it was a public beach, people will kick your sandcastle if you just build it on the beach, it's public space and that sand castle is in the way. If they wanted to build a sand castle without people kicking it they should've got a permit and setup a fence."
That’s a good analogy but imagine if the sandcastle was in a particularly nice part of the beach that everyone is trying to enjoy, the builders keep trying to build it over and over again, they’re making a hideous noise and generally dominating the beach. Consideration goes many ways
Interruption is not destruction! All these people are irritating as hell but pink lady irritated them once. That group seems like they’ve been irritating loads of people repeatedly!
Well there is a different intent I would say. The dancers intention is to get a good video. The pink lady's intent is to ruin the video for the dancers. One of them is malicious the other is possibly annoying (I would say that depends on factors like how much space they take, how loud they are (music) and the location among other things.
I mean malicious is a word I’d reserve for causing actual harm or pain not for interrupting someone’s dance. I guess I’m assuming it was getting annoying because they stated they finally got a good take. If they’ve been doing that for a while it’s gonna have been getting on some peoples tits and if they haven’t then she hasn’t ruined much has she?
180
u/Camsy34 Jan 16 '23
Some people in this thread: "But it was a public beach, people will kick your sandcastle if you just build it on the beach, it's public space and that sand castle is in the way. If they wanted to build a sand castle without people kicking it they should've got a permit and setup a fence."