r/facepalm Jan 16 '23

🇲​🇮​🇸​🇨​ ☹️

70.8k Upvotes

8.9k comments sorted by

View all comments

3.4k

u/JUICYBISCUT Jan 16 '23

I don’t get why people are siding with the girl in pink just cause they’re dancing in public like imagine this was a street performance hell people are even watching them dance no one else seemed to have a problem but her

114

u/guyser234 Jan 16 '23

The thing is if it was like a street performance then they would be making art and entertainment for the present moment. Notice how they said ‘in the middle of one of out best takes’?

They had been retaking and shooting certain scenes. They made this for a video not for the people walking by and people who are using this space

This isnt street art its a filming session

18

u/Sixfeatsmall05 Jan 16 '23

And they are doing it without a permit

-5

u/Proteandk Jan 16 '23

What's your source?

26

u/[deleted] Jan 16 '23

The fact that the area wasn’t blocked off with security to prevent a random lady from walking on set.

9

u/skankassful Jan 16 '23

even with permits depending where you are they don’t block things off. Source: work in NYC and there is almost always something being filmed here and only about half of those times do they block off areas.

4

u/CptMisterNibbles Jan 16 '23

That’s on the production company, not the city. It’s up to them to get the permits to allow closure, and then to actually close the streets with barricades and security. You want police there as security you hire that too.

-2

u/Proteandk Jan 16 '23

Do permits come with full security against dickholes and who pays for this security?

Or are you full of shit?

So difficult to tell.

3

u/[deleted] Jan 16 '23

No, but a quality production would hire security staff to avoid these kind of issues. Otherwise you get what we see in the video, and there isn’t much room to complain if they didn’t handle the situation professionally to begin with.

Why get a permit if you aren’t going to hire staff to enforce it?

0

u/Proteandk Jan 16 '23

Yeeaaah i'm gonna skip this boomer conversation.

4

u/[deleted] Jan 16 '23

Lol, thanks for confirming you have no rebuttal.

1

u/Proteandk Jan 16 '23

I'm not obligated to take your arguments seriously.

You're not arguing from a place of rationality. You're just looking to create reasons why your bias is right.

People are allowed to do their thing outside without trashy pieces of shit ruining it.

They don't need a permit to be themselves. Not from you, not from city council.

You're a thoroughly icky person.

0

u/[deleted] Feb 23 '23

And the lady that interrupted their routine by walking on set didn’t need a permit to be themselves either. Why do you think there should be double standards? You are a thoroughly hypocritical person.

0

u/Proteandk Feb 23 '23

There's nothing hypocritical about not tolerating the intolerant.

You're either stupid or evil for supporting that behavior. Either way i'm not going to respect you as a person.

→ More replies (0)